UNBELIEVABLE

image_pdfimage_print

Chris Spivey

It is truly a sad day for journalism. For the past month or so, my gag reflex has been working overtime as I read the many stories in the newspapers, trying to persuade the Nation that the Royal Family still have a valid role to play in the country… They haven’t.

However, this sycophantic Royal bullshit, such as poor Kate, the Duck crying Crocodile tears, Big Ears unburdening himself and Bizzy Lizzy becoming an Eco-warrior, has fuck all on a story in today’s Daily Mail.

It is in fact, fair to say that over the past year, the government campaign to vilify the unemployed has been gathering momentum at an ever increasing pace. Today however, The Daily Mail has sunk to a new low with what has to be one of the worst bits of journalism that I have ever read.

The article in question is nothing more than a catalogue of bare faced lies designed to turn the unemployed into hated social pariahs.

The worst thing about this government orchestrated witch hunt is that it’s working. Unfortunately, that really doesn’t say much for the populations IQ levels.

Not when they applaud the likes of Iain Dickhead Smith who brags about getting 100,000 people off benefits. That would indeed be worthy of applause if he had fixed the hundred thousand people up with decent jobs, that paid a decent wage.

However, what the obnoxious cunt doesn’t tell you is that a lot of these people have been forced off benefits for refusing to become slave labour and work for free. Working for free is what people who are being punished for committing a crime do. Other’s have had their benefits stopped because the poorly trained, brainwashed zombies who masquerade as staff at the job centre’s, deem them as not doing enough to look for work. I find that extremely worrying when a member of public can decide if another member of the public gets to eat that week or not.

Those people should know better than anyone else should, that there are no fucking jobs for these people. Well, not unless they want to go and mow the Cunt in a Crown’s lawn for £300 PW, which, as I proved last week was well below the rate of benefits http://www.chrisspivey.co.uk/?p=7609 

So, what are these people going to do with no money coming in? They are going to turn to crime of course. Well thought out plan Smith, you fucking plank.

Then there are the disabled who have been forced off ESA benefit. To qualify for ESA nowadays you have to be clinically dead. Never mind that More than a thousand ­sickness benefit claimants died last year after being told to get a job. Source: http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/investigations/2012/04/32-die-a-week-after-failing-in.html

And let’s not forget that many of the unemployed have paid their national insurance stamp for years on end. You see, you pay national insurance in case you find yourself unemployed… It’s not fucking Rocket Science people. Wake up. You are directing your anger and hatred towards the wrong people. Divide and conquer wins every time, and the majority of you idiots, fortunate enough to be in gainful employment fall for it time and time again.

You naively applaud Giddyant Osborne – one of the most obnoxious, smarmy, self satisfied cretins, that I have ever come across – because he is capping and cutting benefits. Think people, for fucks sake. The time to cut benefits is when work is plentiful. Not when there isn’t any work. That is when people need benefits most. Surely, you are not too brain dead to realise that the time to cut benefits and weed out the so called ‘scroungers’ is when jobs which pay a living wage are easy to come by. Give me fucking strength. http://www.chrisspivey.co.uk/?p=6381 

You really have to wake up. The unemployed are not the enemy. It’s the very people who are controlling your minds that are. Think about it. They expect us to pay their mortgages, their decorating bills, their gardens to be done, their furniture, their TV licences, even for their fucking porn, for crying out loud. Yet the poorest, most vulnerable people in society have to pay for their own… That’s If they are lucky enough to have a fucking home.

After all, thanks to the capping of housing benefit, hundreds of thousands of families are losing their homes. Never the less, the fat deviant cunts who are orchestrating this misery still expect those people living on the breadline, who slog their guts out for a pittance, to contribute to the cost of their posh second homes. Yet you still perceive the unfortunate as being the villains! Are you all fucking mad?

If that corrupt, deviant,  Thatcher hadn’t sold all the Council houses off in the 1980’s there wouldn’t be such a severe housing shortage. Likewise, if the present government penalised the Housing Associations for not building their quota of new houses per year, instead of letting them get away with it, the shortage wouldn’t be so severe.

Yet to read the old bollocks in the newspapers, you would believe that anyone claiming benefits is on the fiddle. Once again, the powers that be have you falling for their lies. I’ll tell you who’s really on the fiddle. Those in government and high paid high powered jobs. Every last one of them.

And then, when the criminal, paedophile’s get caught fiddling, what happens? Fuck all. They pay back a few hundred quid and say sorry. And you lot, who think you are superior to the unemployed scratch ya fucking arses, bleat about it for a bit over lunch, and then let the cunts carry on doing it.

And make no mistake; they are still doing it. That makes them repeat offenders for fucks sake. The arrogant thieving fuckers, even tried to pass a law which would prevent them having to reveal how much they steal from us every year . That is tantamount to them robbing your money and closing the door so as you can’t see how much they are stealing off you. Helloooo.  http://www.chrisspivey.co.uk/?p=6556

If a person who has no money coming in to feed his family is nicked for shop lifting food, he’s a scrounging waste of space who should be thrown in prison. Meanwhile, those vile cunts in parliament are committing barely concealed large scale fraud, day in day out and no one bats a fucking eyelid. And the thieving cunts don’t even need the fucking money. Any normal person would be sacked on the spot and be up before the beak on a fraud charge. But you lot, you just let them get away with it.

It is that, “I’m alright Jack, fuck anyone else” mentality that allows the piss taking wankers to get away with it. So, to look down on someone – who no doubt doesn’t feel great about their self anyway – makes you the fucking mugs. If you seriously believe the poor are the problem, then you ain’t got the fucking brains you were born with. Talk about being manipulated.

Every day, I see moronic post’s on FaceBook by uninformed gullible mugs who are under the impression that they are paying for the “lazy bastard scroungers” … You’re not… Not much anyway. The bulk of your tax money goes to paying the interest on the national debt. A debt needlessly run up by the cunts you lot applaud for enslaving you, and which doesn’t in reality even fucking exist. You fall for that blatant shit, yet you have the fucking cheek to look down on people.

Do you really think that you would pay less tax if all those eligible for work stopped claiming? Do me a favour.

The majority of you are that fucking mind controlled that the Main Stream Media even write articles, telling you that the Main Stream Media are purposely turning you against the unemployed. The following is from a copy of last month’s Guardian Newspaper:

Hundreds of thousands of poor people say they have been put off applying for or collecting benefits because of the perceived stigma generated by false media depictions of “scroungers” – leading many to forgo essentials such as food and fuel, a new report claims.

Analysis by researchers, led by the University of Kent’s social policy team, said polls and focus groups had revealed a quarter of claimants had “delayed or avoided asking for” vital welfare payments because of “misleading news coverage driven by [government] policy”.

This “climate of fear” means 1.8 million people have potentially been too scared to seek help they are entitled to from the state. Such is the scale of successive governments’ disinformation that the report calls for ministers to abandon briefing journalists ahead of their speeches and asks Whitehall departments to seek corrections “for predictable and repeated media misinterpretations”.

There you fucking have it, in Black and White. No fly’s on you is there lightning?

So, let’s have a look at this blatant tissue of lies and bullshit in today’s Daily Bollocks, specifically designed to make mugs of you people who perceive yourselves socially adept while ignorantly ridiculing the poor.

The headline reads:

 Unemployed single mother on benefits who spends £2,000 on Christmas with 20 presents for each of her children

 

  • Leanna Broderick plans to give children designer outfits, iPads and jewellery
  • The 20-year-old has never worked and claims nearly £15,500 a year 
  • Claims she is better off on benefits and last year saved £2,500
  • Said there was ‘no point’ getting minimum wage job and paying for childcare

 

Reading that, those lucky enough to have a half decent job would be justified in being outraged. Even more so when you see the accompanying photo of an impeccably turned out, affluent looking, young lady and her two equally well turned out children.

I would like to think that the fact that she is coloured is a coincidence. However, since The Daily Mail appears to be going all out with this hate campaign, I have a feeling that the colour of her skin is deliberate. Even more so when they quote Leanna as arrogantly stating:  “This way, taxpayers know I’m raising two well-brought-up kids.”

The article starts off by saying:

While many families are worrying about how to afford Christmas this year, one jobless single mother has revealed she receives so much in benefits she has £2,000 to spend on designer gifts, clothes and partying.

Mother-of-two Leanna Broderick plans to buy 20 presents for each of her children, including Burberry and Ralph Lauren outfits, iPads and gold jewellery’.

Those opening two sentences are guaranteed to cause Bob the Builder’s jaw to drop. However,that is just the start. The newspaper then goes on to say:

She claims she is better off on benefits and would not get a job unless she could continue her luxury lifestyle, which includes designer outfits, holidays abroad, clubbing, lunches out and expensive gifts for her daughters Zelekah, two, and Zakirah, one.

Last year, I saved £2,500 and my kids had 50 presents each, including Burberry and Ralph Lauren clothes and dolls, DVDs and CDs. 

This year, I’ve saved £2,000 and they’ll get 20 presents each, including iPads and a new Disney-themed bedroom to share, with designer wall art and bed linen,’ she said.

She is also buying gold earrings for Zelekah, who has pierced ears, and keeping £300 for the sales and £150 for a New Year’s Eve outing.

Now, it has to be said that the two children certainly look a lot older than your average 1 and 2yr olds. Fortunately, I wouldn’t dream of challenging the Newspaper about their integrity, although I do question what a 1 and 2 yr old will use their iPad’s for.

However, just in case anyone does doubt the newspapers integrity, the article has made sure to include a list of the benefits and amounts that Leanna receives.

Now, it would be silly of me to say that, everyone is going to be taken in by this old bollocks, but you can bet your life that the vast majority of readers will be. You see, the problem is that people are so mind controlled that they can no longer think for themselves.

The Mail’s Repeater, Rosie Taylor – for she certainly is no Journalist – states as fact, that Leanna receives £1290 per month in benefits. This, quite correctly totals £15,480 per annum. This money is made up of the following:

  •  £444 monthly Housing Benefit
  • £80 monthly Council Tax Benefit
  • £430 monthly Child Tax Credits
  • £132 monthly Child Benefit
  • £180 monthly Single Parent Benefit
  • £24 monthly Milk and Fruit Allowance.

Ok, straight away Leanna will not see her Housing or Council Tax Benefits. This now takes her monthly income down to £766. We will be fair and assume the Mail is using a 4 week month. That means Leanna has an income of £191 PW if the children really are less than 4 yrs old.

Lianna also says that she enjoys a luxury lifestyle. Ok, let’s check it out. Her weekly water, gas, electric must come to at least £35PW. That leaves her £156 to play with.

Phone, internet, and TV Licence £15 PW fair? Fuck it, let’s make it £16 PW so we can round it up. Lianna is now left £140.

Food? Despite Lianna’s claim of a luxury life style lets be frugal and say £80PW all in. Lianna now has £60 PW left. I am assuming that she doesn’t have a car but she must have travel costs. Shall we again be frugal and say £15 PW? Lianna now has £45 left.

We are also lead to believe that Lianna and her Daughters wear designer clothes. I did a quick survey amongst those with young children who are on my face book. Expenditure on children’s clothes seems to vary wildly with some spending up to £400 a month on their kids, while others spent a modest £50. Let’s for arguments sake forget the designer clothes and down grade to Primark. So, if we say £20 PW for all three of them, that is more than fair, yes?

Lianna now has £25 PW left and we have been very, very frugal. We haven’t allowed for going out, treats for the kids. New DVD player, Toaster or one of the many other appliances that constantly need replacing. Then there’s the Hairdresser, Nail’s, Make Up, Shoes. Household Insurance. Catalogue payments. Birthdays etc, etc etc. The list is endless.

But forget about all those extras. After all, Lianna is a saver. We know this because the Daily Mail told us, therefore it must be true. So, lets assume that the extravagant spend thrift Lianna saves that spare £25 PW come rain or shine. I make that a total of £100 per month… Hang on! The daily Mail categorically states that Leanna saves £250 a month. So where is the £150 per month shortfall coming from? Even if we took back our weekly £20 PW clothing allowance she still has a £70  per month shortfall. And that is without the lunches out, luxury holiday’s and night’s out clubbing.

However, in case I have been too generous in my allowances, let’s cross reference with the experts. The following was a report that appeared in the Guardian, from September of this year:

Parents of toddlers are likely to find themselves significantly out of pocket too, as between the ages of one and four a child costs around £13,014 per year. New parents also face a £9,152 bill during the first twelve months of their new baby’s life, taking into account expenditure on equipment such as buggies, cots and prams etc.

The costs are based on calculations carried out by the Centre for Economics and Business Research for LV=, and on research using a sample of 3,953 adults.

Oh! So forgetting the extra £9,152 bill for a new born, Lianna’s two children should be costing her £26,028 per annum just to maintain a ‘normal’ life style. And that is without taking herself into account. Yet we are told that Lianna and her kids have a luxury life on £15,480, which is in reality £9,192.

Therefore, we can conclude one of two things. Either Lianna has a substantial extra income, in which case she is a benefit cheat or The Daily Mail is printing lies on behalf of the government. Either way, the article is bullshit. Did our intrepid newshound,Rosie Taylor, in her quest to report the truth not think to do a quick calculation?

If Lianna is committing Benefit Fraud, then she should be reported and the Daily Mail should issue a grovelling apology to those people who are starving on benefits. On the other hand, if the Daily Mail deliberately misleads its readers, for no other reasons than to cause resentment towards the unemployed and to help the government inflict more misery upon those who can least afford it; then the paper should, at the very least face a substantial fine. There is however, no difference between manipulating people to resent the unemployed and inciting racial hatred.

As for those smug cunts in parliament? How much more are you people going to take? Let’s go to war.

Until the next time,

Much love,

Chris.

 

 

 Unemployed single mother on benefits who spends £2,000 on Christmas with 20 presents for each of her children

 

While many families are worrying about how to afford Christmas this year, one jobless single mother has revealed she receives so much in benefits she has £2,000 to spend on designer gifts, clothes and partying.

Mother-of-two Leanna Broderick plans to buy 20 presents for each of her children, including Burberry and Ralph Lauren outfits, iPads and gold jewellery.

The 20-year-old, who has never worked, claims nearly £15,500 a year in state handouts.

Want for nothing: Leanna Broderick (pictured centre with Zelekah, left, and Zakirah) has revealed she receives so much in benefits she has £2,000 to spend on ChristmasWant for nothing: Leanna Broderick (pictured centre with Zelekah, left, and Zakirah) has revealed she receives so much in benefits she has £2,000 to spend on Christmas
Leanna Broderick is planning on buying her children iPads
She is also buying some gold earrings for her two-year-old daughter

Expensive: Miss Broderick is planning on buying iPads and gold earrings among other gifts for her daughters

How the cash adds up

She claims she is better off on benefits and would not get a job unless she could continue her luxury lifestyle, which includes designer outfits, holidays abroad, clubbing, lunches out and expensive gifts for her daughters Zelekah, two, and Zakirah, one.

‘Last year, I saved £2,500 and my kids had 50 presents each, including Burberry and Ralph Lauren clothes and dolls, DVDs and CDs.

‘This year, I’ve saved £2,000 and they’ll get 20 presents each, including iPads and a new Disney-themed bedroom to share, with designer wall art and bed linen,’ she said.

She is also buying gold earrings for Zelekah, who has pierced ears, and keeping £300 for the sales and £150 for a New Year’s Eve outing.

Miss Broderick, who left school at 16 with no GCSEs, said: ‘I don’t care if people get annoyed. I don’t take advantage, I just choose to save – it’s smart.’

 

She said there was ‘no point’ earning less in a minimum wage job and having to pay for childcare on top.

After becoming pregnant at 17 with her on-off 23-year-old boyfriend, Miss Broderick was allocated a temporary three-bed council house.

Leanna Broderick's interview appears in the Christmas issue of CloserLeanna Broderick’s interview appears in the Christmas issue of Closer

When Zelekah was eight months old she considered working in care, but then became pregnant again by the same man.

Now split from the girls’ father, she has a new two-bedroom council flat in Croydon, South London, with a garden, which is paid for by her £111 weekly housing benefit – part of £1,290 a month total claim.

She said: ‘I didn’t want to miss out on my kids’ childhoods or have someone else raise them. I’m not one of those girls who gets pregnant for the benefits.’

The money for Christmas comes from the £250 she saves each month, which she said shows she is ‘really responsible’.

She adds: ‘Anyone who thinks people on benefits don’t deserve nice things is talking rubbish. I work 24/7 as a mother. 

‘This way, taxpayers know I’m raising two well-brought-up kids.’

But she admits Christmas might not be so lavish next year because of the Government’s benefit cuts.

‘I’m not against the cuts, but only if the Government helps me find a job,’ she said.

‘In the meantime, I’ll stay on benefits and get as much as I can out of it.’

The full feature appears in Closer Christmas issue, on sale now or go to www.closeronline.co.uk

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2246104/Unemployed-single-mother-benefits-spends-2-000-Christmas-20-presents-children.html#ixzz2EiTBb7du
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook