The nonce who would be King

The Daily Chimpanzee

 

I see that the utterly vile cunt Jonathan King is being given print space in the Chimp to air his controversial views.

On this occasion, he is saying that Jimmy Savile is innocent, although he is trying to be clever with his words and the meaning of innocent in law.

Course, Savile was about as innocent as what that cunt was when he was jailed in 2001 for 7 years – although he still protests his innocence to anyone mad enough to listen.

The vile nonce even says that if he was on trial today he would have got a not guilty verdict:

If I’d been tried now, instead of 14 years ago, when the ages of consent had only just been equalised thanks to the EU and to the fury of homophobes, I would certainly have been found innocent.’

What the cunt seems to forget is that he was up in court on six counts of CSA  – one buggery, one attempted buggery, and four indecent assaults – all committed on boys aged 14 and 15.

Course, a fair number of people find it strange that King hasn’t been dragged in and questioned about his activities by operation yewtree defectives.

I don’t.

You see, personally, I think that King is pretty much untouchable.

Why?

Because I believe that whilst he was in the nick for shagging underage boys, King aimed veiled threats via the MSM in Prince Buggerlugs direction.

Below is a Sunday Express article from 2003 which is self explanatory. See if you come to the same conclusion as me after reading it.

That article is followed by the Chimp article giving voice to nonce King and his warped ideas about Savile .

Oh, and knowing what we do about Buggerlugs, make sure when reading the Express article that you read between the lines … Just sayin’.

 

 

Charles’s fury over Palace note to pop’s evil child molester

SUNDAY EXPRESS December 28,2003

Jailed Jonathan claims he has Prince’s support after ‘stock reply’ from aide

PERVERT  Jonathan  King  has infuriated  Prince  Charles  by conning his staff into writing to

him in jail.

The  Prince  has  ordered  an inquiry  into  how  his  office  sent  a letter to the disgraced former music mogul and TV presenter which King is now attempting to use as bizarre ammunition in his campaign to have his child sex conviction overturned.

Jailed  King  is  showing  off  the letter, complete with its royal crest, to fellow inmates and claiming he has the support of the highest quarters of the land.

Last  night,  a  royal  source  said  it  was  the  SECOND  time  the  sex  offender  has  tried  to  fool Prince  Charles’  staff  into supporting him and insisted he  should  never  have received a reply.

A royal aide said: “Prince Charles is very upset that he could be used like this, especially when it was known this person  King  had  tried  it before.

“It’s horrifying to think that this evil man is waving Prince Charles’  royal  notepaper around the jail claiming he has royal backing for his cause.”

The one-time pop singer, 58, serving seven years for offences against schoolboys  lured  by  his  celebrity status,  wrote  to  the  Prince  from Maidstone Prison, in Kent.

On an Internet website he runs from prison, he boasted: “Re: Letter to Prince Charles, I have received a very nice and supportive letter from Prince Charles in response to this post,  which  must  remain  personal as  you  can  understand  but  which was much appreciated. JK.”

In his letter, King refers to former valet George Smith, who claimed to have  been  raped  by  a  member  of  Prince  Charles’s  staff,  and  warns Charles: “Three or four false allegations  of  rape…you  could  be ruined and the monarchy destroyed.

“It  will  never  happen,  hopefully, because the police would be on your side but, when they are not, when the quest for raised conviction rates overwhelms  the  desire  for  justice, men  and  women  are  wrongfully convicted.”

King has never shown regret for his crimes and failed to mention in his letter that he was being targeted by inmates sickened because he is a “nonce”, notorious prison slang for paedophile.

Many jailed paedophiles in King’s position  apply  for  solitary  confinement  in  order  to  escape  attacks from disgusted fellow inmates.

The  governor  at  Maidstone Prison has ordered his own inquiry into King’s use of the Internet after

a crisis meeting.

Last  night,  a  St  James’  Palace source said: “The Prince of Wales’s office  received  a  letter  from

Jonathan King and he, in turn, was sent  a  standard  two-line  reply acknowledging receipt of the correspondence.

“It  basically  contained  the message: ‘Thank you very much for writing,  yours  sincerely.’  He  didn’t get a letter from the Prince himself and the Prince was not even aware of the letter being sent.“

King  is  now  trying  to  use  this acknowledgement  of  correspondence  to  claim  he  has  Prince Charles’  support,  which  is  simply ludicrous.”

King has taken his fight against sex abuse convictions to Strasbourg and the European Court of Human Rights.

He was found guilty in September 2001  of  four  indecent  assaults against  boys  aged  14  to  15  in  the 1980s.

King, the self-styled King of Hits, has  always  maintained  his  innocence and complained about the justice system.

In January, he failed in a bid to have his conviction overturned at the Court of Appeal in London. He  has  also  asked  the Criminal  Cases  Review Commission  to  examine  his case.

King  had  his  first  hit  with Everyone’s Gone To The Moon in 1965 and was involved with discovering  new  talent  for Decca Records in the 1960s. He also produced records for Genesis, played  a  big  role  in  promoting supergroup  10cc  and  is  credited with a similar function for the Bay City Rollers.

He  was  fronting  the  TV  show Entertainment USA and running his UK Records label at the time of his offences.

At his trial, the Old Bailey heard how  the  Cambridge-educated impresario  lured  the  boys  to  his fashionable  mews  home  at Queensborough  Studios  in Bayswater,  central  London,  and showed  them  pornography  before assaulting them.

A  second  trial  based  on  allegations that he committed serious sexual offences against two boys in the seventies collapsed.

 

 

 

 

Paedophile Jonathan King claims Jimmy Savile was INNOCENT and his victims were his ‘accusers’

  • Jonathan King was jailed for seven years in 2001 for sexually abusing five teenage boys – he continues to protest his innocence
  • The 69-year-old pervert said predatory rapist Savile was an ‘innocent man’
  • Appalling outburst came today in King’s monthly column for Inside Time
  • He said Savile’s victims should be referred to as ‘accusers’ because the pervert DJ never appeared in court
  • He wrote: ‘The crimes never happened. At least miscarriages of justice in cases of murder have bodies to show that crimes did take place’

By LIZZIE PARRY

PUBLISHED: 17:20, 5 March 2014 | UPDATED: 19:04, 5 March 2014

 

Disgraced pervert Jonathan King today said serial predatory rapist Jimmy Savile was innocent.

The 69-year-old former music mogul branded the dead DJ’s victims his ‘accusers’, in an outburst that will appall those abused Savile.

King, who was jailed for seven years in 2001 for sexually assaulting five teenage boys, made the shocking statement in his column for the prison newspaper Inside Time.

He still refuses to admit to his crimes, but was released from prison in 2005.

Pervert Jonathan King has claimed Jimmy Savile is innocent

+4

Disgraced pervert Jimmy Saville

+4

Appalling outburst: Disgraced pervert Jonathan King (left) today said serial predatory rapist Jimmy Savile (right) is innocent. Writing in his Inside Time column, the 69-year-old said: ‘He was an innocent man’

 

The pervert, who still protests his innocence, said Savile is an ‘innocent man’ in the eyes of the law.

King, who discovered the band Genesis and fronted the BPI Awards – now the BRITS – in 1987, said Savile was not a ‘serial rapist’, despite around 1,000 children claiming they were abused by the presenter.

 

Writing his monthly column, King lambasted the media for calling Savile a rapist, adding: ‘He (Savile) wasn’t.

‘He was an innocent man unless, of course, (newspapers) agree with the current legal premise that an accused person is guilty until or unless he or she can prove themselves innocent.

‘That applies dead or alive, doesn’t it, unless we must believe the media always carries the truth.’

Guilty: King, 69, was jailed in 2001 for seven years after being found guilty of sexually abusing five teenage boys. He protests his innocence in his monthly column while claiming that those abused by Savile should be referred to as 'accusers' rather than his victims because the pervert DJ never appeared in court

+4

Guilty: King, 69, was jailed in 2001 for seven years after being found guilty of sexually abusing five teenage boys. He protests his innocence in his monthly column while claiming that those abused by Savile should be referred to as ‘accusers’ rather than his victims because the pervert DJ never appeared in court

 

He claimed Savile’s hundreds of victims should be referred to as ‘accusers’, due to the fact Savile never appeared in court.

Addressing his own crimes, the 69-year-old, said he has been provoked by the recent aquittal of celebrities including Coronation Street actors Michael Le Vell and Bill Roache.

He said juries in those cases did not believe the crimes had taken place, and were ‘at worst fiction, at best exaggeration’.

King claims the jury in his case should have come to the same conclusion.

He adds: ‘The crimes never happened. At least miscarriages of justice in cases of murder have bodies to show that crimes did take place. If I’d been tried now, instead of 14 years ago, when the ages of consent had only just been equalised thanks to the EU and to the fury of homophobes, I would certainly have been found innocent.’

Report: Dame Janet Smith, a former court appeal judge, is compiling a report on the Savile scandal. It is expected to claim he abused up to 1,000 children and that the BBC 'turned a blind eye' to the former DJ¿s offending, allowing him to rape and sexually assault hundreds of victims over five decades

+4

Report: Dame Janet Smith, a former court appeal judge, is compiling a report on the Savile scandal. It is expected to claim he abused up to 1,000 children and that the BBC ‘turned a blind eye’ to the former DJ¿s offending, allowing him to rape and sexually assault hundreds of victims over five decades

 

King became known to millions of TV viewers after fronting BBC2’s Entertainment USA show in the 1980s

A report being compiled by Dame Janet Smith, a former court of appeal judge, into the Savile scandal will claim that he abused up to 1,000 children on BBC premises.

The report is expected to find how the BBC ‘turned a blind eye’ to the former DJ’s offending, allowing him to rape and sexually assault hundreds of victims over five decades.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2573938/Paedophile-Jonathan-King-claims-Jimmy-Savile-INNOCENT-victims-accusers.html#ixzz2v9pSbfNF
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook