The Grand Old Duke Of York – Its not about how many men he had.

image_pdfimage_print

Chris Spivey

 

With the outrage being caused by the news that Princess Andrew was shagging an under-age girl whilst hanging out with his paedo-playmate, Jeff ‘the nonce’ Epstein, I thought that I might as well re-release the following article that I wrote in September 2013.

Why?

Well because if nothing else it proves that the MSM are extremely slow in the “gerrin there son” department.

Now you just mark my words, next they will be reporting that Jeffrey Nonce-Cunt also ‘lent’ Sarah Ferguson Fifteen Grand and that when he was arrested Jeff the Kiddie-fiddler had 10… Count them TEN… Different phone numbers for Peter ‘Hamster in my pocket bum’ Mandelson.

And of course, Mandelson likes to be near children for obvious reasons, hence his connection to the NSPCC.

However, from what I can see, the NSPCC – that children’s charity of whom the Queen is patron and which likes to employ murdering South African Terrorists as Social Workers, – has of late been trying to distance themselves from the murdering child rapist.

That is to say that Mandelson is a murdering child rapist if that list of Satanic Paedophiles that I posted on here last year is correct and to be believed… Which I should think that given the source it is 100% spot on.

You can find that list by clicking HERE  but the page concerning Pete the Pervert is republished below.

9

And of course, the Queen honoured Manky Mandelson with a knighthood despite him twice having been drummed out of politics for wrongdoing.

I will also remind you that donating your money to the NSPCC is in fact helping fund child abuse which I have in the past written about in detail – and all of which can be found on this site.

For a couple of examples, click HERE and HERE

That fact in turn would explain why the “charity” are so fucking useless. 

But anyway, the NSPCC are now saying that all Mandelson did for them was front their “Full Stop” campaign, which is of course, bollocks… Princess Andrew fronted that for them… Just sayin’.

It really does get all to easy.

But anyway, here is that article from 2013…

 

Friends of Princess Andrew and Fergie Pork say it is only a matter of time before the couple remarry… Who gives a fuck?

Me actually. I find these evil parasites fucking fascinating in a car crash sort of way.

Below my take on the situation are two Daily Mail articles about the comedy duo.

The first one  is in regard to the Gruesome Twosome rekindling their ‘love’ for each other. The second is about how The Duck will object to any remarriage.

Unsurprisingly, neither article so much as hints at paedophilia or other ‘juicy’ sordid shenanigans.

Instead, what we get is tales of Porky Pig’s debt which saw her sink to rock bottom after being covertly filmed by the News of the World –  offering access to her ex hubby, Princess Andrew for a cool half a million quid.

Quite why anyone would pay that amount of money to meet the perverted nonce is beyond me.

However, I find it a stretch too far to believe that Princess Andrew wasn’t in on his ex-wifes lucrative money making deals.

Yet, apart from a further, brief mention of Princess Andrews disastrous spell as a trade ambassador, that is more or less it as far as the Daily Mails idea of balanced reporting goes.

The rest of the propaganda rags two articles are littered with sycophantic bullshit such as: “With the monarchy still basking in a warm glow of public approval generated principally by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and, now, their son, Prince George”… More a case of wishful thinking than accurate reporting in my opinion.

So, its a good job that I am on hand to add some proper balance.

For instance, the two articles put forward three reasons as to why the Pork Chops split up in the first place.

Princess Andrews version is that:

He has always felt guilty for his part in the marriage break-up, his negligence in being less attentive than he might have been to a new wife and mother struggling to cope with her royal life, as he devoted himself to his naval career”.

Or at least it is according to the Daily Mail.

Likewise, Porky Pigs version is that:  

‘There was no reason for Andrew and I to get divorced; there wasn’t another person in our lives to go to. ‘We got divorced because I had to go out to work, and Andrew and I believed that it wasn’t right for me to be commercial while I was still in the Royal Family’.

Or at least it is according to the Daily Mail.

Mind you, The Daily Mails version is that:

“Married for little more than five years when they split up over the Duchess’s adulterous liaisons, the couple have remained extraordinarily close”.  

Or at least it is according to the errr… Daily mail

Course, it wasn’t so much Porky Yorky’s affairs that were to blame for the marriage break-up.

After all, Princess Andrew’s taste in sexual partners lay elsewhere.

But having your wife appear on the front page of every newspaper in the world, with her tits out and her foot stuck in the mouth of a bald headed playboy, doesn’t go down well when you are the Queens son… Not that he hasn’t been caught on camera in rather compromising photos himself, don’t cha know.

 

The Mail – rather laughably – makes mention of the fact that ‘some of those people close to the couple were surprised that Fergie turned to Princess Andrew for help‘ after she got into a financial mess.

Quite why they are surprised is a mystery.

Not withstanding the fact that Princess Andrew was probably in on his wife’s ‘cash for queersons’ money making scam, who better than to blackmail other than your Paedophile Prince ex husband?

The conversation probably went along the lines of the following:

Sarah Ferguson (SF): I’m skint, a mess and bleedin’ homeless, Andy Pansy.

Princess Andrew (PA): Not my problem Ginge… Fuck me, I’m having enough bliddy trouble getting Eugenics and Meaty Beattie Big and Bouncy orn the Gravy Train. Mumsy  will never agree to you being added too… You eat to bliddy much.

SF: I don’t want to go orn the civil list Fairy Cakes. I want you to pay orf my debts – 2 million pineds will do it… Oh, and if you could buy me a bliddy great big mansion too. That would be fab, what, what snort. 

PA: Do one Duchess.

SF: Okay yah, I’ll just go sell the story of you and Jeffrey Epstein to the Sun newspaper… The real story, Mind. Not the watered dine version printed in your Mummy’s newspaper (Read More)

PA: Bothered! Four words lard arse: Daddy Duck and Diana.

SF (coming over all cockney): Are you avin a laff me old cock sparra? After that fuck up in Paris old Quacker Nutz wouldn’t dare. But you do what you gotta do Sunshine. And I’ll do what I gotta do… See ya, wouldn’t like to be ya.

PA: Hold on Freckle… One was only pulling ones trotter… Two million Pineds wasn’t it. And you can move into Sunny Hice with me.

And the rest, is history… Almost.

After all, how could that be all with the Royal Beggars involved?

Especially so when you consider that Porky Yorky has no morals, shame or dignity.

You see, despite telling the Evening Standard; “I abhor paedophilia and any sexual abuse of children” in March 2011 – She hadn’t had any qualms about borrowing £15,000 from Epstein. Neither did she say when or if she was going to pay back the ‘loan’. SOURCE

Now, the afore mentioned Jeffrey Epstein – Princess Andrews, bezzy mate –  is an American who describes himself as a financier and science and education philanthropist.

I on the other hand, would describe him as a dirty nonce cunt who wants tightly stringing up by the bollocks, 30 ft in the air until they turn black, become detached and the rest of him crashes to the ground… filthy sick piece of worm infested dog shit.

Course, there is no question that Princess Andrew knew only too well that his bum chum was a warped nonce.

In fact, such was their closeness, the royal retard refused to sever his ties with the kiddie fiddler when their friendship first became common knowledge.

Then again, that isn’t unusual for our Royal Ponce Cunts who see nothing wrong with associating themselves with sex cases I.E Big Ears and Savile, Savile and Louie Mountbatten, Louie Mountbatten and the Duck, the Duck and Savile and round again.

Then there was the convicted sex pest Harbinder Singh Rana, who turned up on the Royal Barge to help the Royal no-marks celebrate 60 years of ripping the country off.

The following is from the Daily Mail:

A sex offender who posed as a doctor to prey on women was a guest of the Queen on the Royal Barge.

Harbinder Singh Rana, 52, was jailed in the 1980s for a series of attacks on women, who believed he was a doctor, in which he performed internal examinations and administered injections.

Rana served four years for his crimes, but has since reinvented himself as a pillar of the community.

The former management consultant was invited to join the exclusive celebrations by Prince Charles in his capacity as community leader.  

He is understood to have met the prince through his charity work for the Anglo-Sikh heritage trail, a group that promotes Sikh culture in Britain.

But palace sources last night said the prince was completely unaware of the charity director’s shameful past-and would never have invited him had he known.

Approached yesterday Rana said that he did not know if he had been vetted and had not been asked about his sex crimes before the event. Source

Alright, alright, stop fucking laughing.

How do you know that Big Ears isn’t telling the truth when he says that he wasn’t aware of the perverts past.

After all, The moronic buffoon and his Dad the Duck were friends with the Satanic paedophile, necrophiliac rapist, Sir Jimmy Savile – knighted by Bizzy Lizzie – and they had no idea he was a Monster… Apparently.

And maybe… Just maybe…  Singh Asong, or whatever the warped cunts name is wasn’t vetted before hand… Savile apparently wasn’t.

I mean, why else would the big eared fuck up be so annoyed- having only allegedly found out about Singh Asongs sikh & sordid past after the event?… Sikh & sordid past… Ha, ha, ha… I like that.. Sikh & sordid past… Go me.

The following is from the Telegraph:

Harbinder Singh Rana, 52, was invited as a guest of the Prince of Wales through his work for the Anglo-Sikh Heritage Trail, which promotes the Sikh community in Britain.

But it later emerged that he was jailed for four years after he was found guilty of assaulting women in their homes while posing as a doctor

The prince is said to be angry that security staff failed on five occasions to alert him about the charity worker’s criminal convictions – including five counts of indecent assault, 11 counts of assault and one of attempted assault, the Daily Mirror revealed.

A Palace source told the newspaper: “Charles is livid at not being warned.”

Rana was banished from all future royal events. Source

Do me a fucking favour.

 

Of course the fucking pathetic Royal twat knew about the perverted Singh & Savile’s activities.

Just like he knew about the perverted paedophile cunt the Reverend Peter Ball.

And, in the very same way that both Singh & Savile were vetted by the Security Services… You would have to be a Goldfish to believe otherwise.

Now, you can either choose to believe the MSM with their absolutely ridiculous claims that the Royals were taken in by these perverse sex cases, having been let down by their ultra strict vetting service… At least you can if you want to be a brain dead, mugged off robot.

Or you can face the fucking truth and realize that you have been waving a stupid little plastic flag at a family of thieving, inbred paedophiles… The fucking lot of them are, both Male & Female… Sick, sick, sick fucking monsters who should be removed from the face of the earth and their redistributed wealth used for the good of humanity such as putting an end to the poverty and injustice brought about in no small way by the obnoxious cunts greed.

“A divine right to rule” ?

Yeah right!

Fuck them, and fuck anyone who supports them in anyway.

And that includes the Paedophile protecting sick fuck The Cunt Cameron. Source

Why is this vile, useless, pervert masquerading as the British Prime Minister still in power?

He is a fucking criminal, not a fucking leader. Corrupt beyond belief.

He should be sat awaiting trial in some dark, dank dungeon… He too is a sick, sick, sick Monster. Are you all fucking mad?The evidence to support the facts are plain to see. Read More

Fuck me, the Gate Keeper to the Paedophiles Political Paradise even came out in public support for Princess Andrew following the Epstein story breaking.

The following is once again taken from the Daily Mail:

Prince Andrew today received the full backing of David Cameron after Downing Street said he was doing an ‘important job’ as a UK trade envoy.

The Prime Minister’s spokesman issued the backing following a series of allegations against the Duke of York centred on his relationship with billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

The Prince today visited an east London school and the headquarters of Crossrail where he appeared unaffected by the row in which he is embroiled.

Asked whether David Cameron had full confidence in Prince Andrew as a trade envoy, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman replied: ‘Yes.’ Source

Now, the fact that our Prime Minister gave Princess Andrew his backing  is fucked up beyond belief when you consider the facts listed on the Daily Mails photo below.

from one disaster to another.jpg

But, the Cunt Cameron’s backing really shows the kind of stinking cesspit our Prime Ministers morals are born out of, when you take into account Princess Andrews close friendship with Jeff Epstein.

In March 2005, Palm Beach police, were contacted by a woman concerned that her 14 year old daughter had been taken to Epstein’s mansion and paid $300 after stripping and massaging him.

Supposedly, the girl had told Epstein that she was 18 years old.

However, by 2011 at least 40 girls – mostly under age –  had come forward with similar stories, some saying Epstein sexually assaulted them during the massage. In fact, three 12-year-old French girls had been delivered to him for his twisted pleasure as a birthday present.

Epstein had even purchased a “Balkan sex slave” from her family when she was just 14… This is Princess Andrews best friend remember. The best friend that Andy Pansy used tax payers money to charter helicopters with just so as he could go and play golf with the perverted nonce. (Sourced from Wikipedia & the Slog)

The American judiciary – being every bit as corrupt as ours –  knew all about the above when Epstein was sentenced.

The Slog Blog continues on the same subject (no I’m not one to bear a grudge just because John Ward launched a totally unprovoked and unfounded attack on my person… I’m nice):

In the US, sex crimes of this nature typically carry a term of 10 to 20 years in prison.  Indeed, the very fact of serious FBI involvement makes clear that the crimes were considered to be extremely serious, organised, and professionally rewarded.

Yet Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced to just 13 months in jail.

The Beast also described how ‘Fear and intimidation experienced by victims during pre-trial proceedings, combined with a ferocious, protracted campaign to undermine the prosecution, culminated in a set of charges that became a virtual slap on the wrist.’

Tina Brown is married to the London Times legend Harry Evans, an editor whose Insight investigations were the envy of the world. For her to print an accusation so blatantly means she knew it to be fact. And I’d imagine that Evans encouraged her to go with it. The combined experience of the couple is awesome.

Treading on toxic ground, the Daily Mail later got one of Epstein’s victims to go public, and describe her years as “a teenage sex toy”. The woman concerned, Virginia Roberts, produced a photograph of herself with Prince Andrew.

It dated from 2001 – when she was 15 – and the ‘toy’ alleged that Epstein had paid her $15,000 to ‘meet’ the prince. The general tone of the piece was to suggest that Epstein had been pimping her around his circle over several years – before the age of 15 – while at the same time regularly abusing the girl.

Yet Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced to just 13 months in jail.

In 2005, a young girl first brought sex-crime allegations against Jeffrey Epstein to the Palm Beach Police Department, which sought felony charges against Epstein.

Subsequently, however, the State Attorney agreed to charge him “only with one count of aggravated assault with no intent to commit a felony”.

The difference between the US and Britain, however, is that when faced with an obvious perversion of justice, law officers don’t always look the other way. The attorney concerned, R. Alexander Acosta, brought in the State and then the FBI, who in turn alerted the Attorney General’s office in Washington. But it was 2010 before Epstein started his prison sentence.

And Jeffrey Epstein was sentenced to just 13 months in jail.

With that kind of influence, you won’t be surprised to know that Mr Epstein had an address book that was to say the least eclectic. In fact, so sure had Epstein been of his immunity, he had placed it online.

The names in the book – and here again we are in Readsay territory, because nobody involved disputes these facts – go beyond the dynamite scale:

* The convicted paedophile’s addresses included ten entries for Lord Mandelson and his partner Reinaldo da Silva. They are both ‘gay’: why on earth would they be in the little black book of a paedopimp?

* The book had no fewer than 16 numbers for Prince Andrew, including thehome numbers for politicians Lord Heseltine and former Northern Ireland Secretary Shaun Woodward. The Prince admitted Epstein was a close friend, and refused to disown him even when the guy was found guilty.

* An office address for Tony Blair and a personal number for Bill Clinton were also among the virtual names on record.

Victim Virginia Roberts then confirmed that Mandelson was a regular visitor to Epstein’s New York town house. ‘I remember him being at the house in New York, and I was introduced to him at a dinner party. He and Jeffrey talked business together,” she testified.

Now, imagine you are teacher Wayne Bedfellow, and three kids at your school have complained about inapproriate physical approaches. So the local Plod rings the Met and asks about the names in an address book owned by that West End pimp Reggie Richardson, who just went down for a ten-stretch on charges of pimping minors .

In there are five entries for Solihull teacher Wayne Bedfellow. Don’t you think the West Midlands boys in blue would at least get Wayne in for questioning?

Shaun Woodward refused to comment on his otherwise unexplained entry in Epstein’s online book. Peter Mandelson refused to answer when asked about why convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein had ten entries for him and his partner Reinaldo da Silva…including fax and email numbers for the latter.

The peer just toughed it out. When contacted by the Mail, Lord Heseltine said he had “no memory” of meeting Jeffrey Epstein.

The Duke of York stayed at the townhouse, just off Central Park, for four days one Christmas. Epstein lent his former wife Sarah Ferguson £15,000 when she got into financial difficulties. Both the Prince and Mandelson know Kazakh socialite and businesswoman Goga Ashkenazi: she is alleged to have introduced Andrew to Timur Kulibayev, the man who bought Prince Andrew’s former marital home, Sunninghill, at £3million above the asking price. That’s fifteen million Pounds. Ashkenazi too has multiple entries in the contact file of paedophile pimp Jeffrey Epstein.

Oddly, to the best of my knowledge, PC George Dixon has not been up the Palace to ask a lot of impertinent questions. Read More

I gotta fucking tell you people. The fact that these publicly funded vile cunts are getting away with in your face child sex abuse absolutely fucking sickens me.

So, why would the Paedophile Epstein have 10 phone numbers stored for the Paedophile Mandelson?

Fuck knows, the cunt wouldn’t tell anyone:

Lord Mandelson yesterday maintained his silence over the extent of his contact with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

The former Business Secretary did not respond to questions about why the convicted paedophile’s ‘little black book’ featured ten entries for him and his partner Reinaldo da Silva.

The online contacts book had 16 numbers for Prince Andrew and home numbers for politicians including Lord Heseltine and former Northern Ireland Secretary Shaun Woodward. There were also details of girls working at massage parlours. Source

Course, Princess Andrew and Peter ‘stick another hamster in my arse’ Mandelson are old friends from the NSPCC.

Now, obviously regular readers will already know that the NSPCC is a nonce infested cash cow.

For those who don’t there is plenty of information to be found on this site about the Children’s ‘Charity’… Not least their employment of the once most wanted MK terrorist in South Africa – wanted in connection for up to 7 murders – as a fucking Grief Councillor of all things. Source

You really couldn’t make this shit up.

While we are on the subject, just excuse me for a second.

TOM WATSON MP: Iv’e been  receiving interesting information about you, ya fat fuck… Just so you know, that I know. 

Sorry about that. I know Tom likes to read what I have to say.

Right, where was I?

Oh yes. Princess Andrew and Peter Mandelson.

Pansy Andy was the Chairman of the NSPCC’s ‘Full Stop’ Campaign.

Again, slightly off topic for a moment, but worthy of a mention is the fact that Sir Rodney Walker was the head of that very same Campaign.

So what, you may ask.

Well, it was Sir Rodders who bought Jimmy Saviles Scarborough flat… The flat in which Savile did unspeakable things to his mothers dead body for 5 days after she died… Just saying.

Moreover, the convicted paedophile Stuart Hall was given a character reference from an NSPCC employee, read out to the jury during the trial.

The following is from the Daily Mirror:

A volunteer NSPCC branch chair caused an online storm after it emerged she had given Stuart Hall a character reference.

Patricia Macmillan, chair of the East Cheshire branch, defended Hall in a letter to the court on the grounds of his charity work.

But charity bosses today said they had no warning of her actions until the letter was read out in court in support of the 83-year-old. Source

Do yourselves a favour and check out the many, many times that the NSPCC have been caught employing Paedophiles… And stop fucking donating to the nonce charity for fucks sake. You are not helping to stop child abuse by donating your hard earned… You are funding it.

Peter Mandelson, is also part of the NSPCC set up and backed Princess Andy – who is gifted quarter of a million pound per annum by his Mother (or us in other words) – for his role as a roving ambassador for British Trade International… A role that even his Elephant eared, clot of an older brother thought unsuitable for the nonce halfwit

The following is from the Guardian:

Peter Mandelson is understood to have given behind-the scenes backing for Prince Andrew’s cause. The former Northern Ireland secretary met him while working on the NSPCC’s Full Stop campaign against child abuse, which Prince Andrew chaired. Source

That fact should be very, very alarming given the many widely broadcast allegations leveled at the Nonce Mandelson.

The following is what the website www.whale.to/c/peter_mandelson.html has to say about the sick cunt.

Although Labour Supremo Peter Mandelsons’ alleged role in the kidnapping of young girls and boys for the “pleasuring” of the European Union’s elite commissioners in Brussels was the subject of intense speculation long before the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, I can now bring to a close all speculation as to the name of Tony Blair’s most “highly placed and senior politician” who fell not only under the scrutiny of Scotland Yard for crimes against children, but was also identified by the FBI as an active member of the paedophile ring run by Thomas Hamilton.  

Thomas Hamilton was of course the sick fuck who shot dead 16 children aged between 4 and 6 years old along with their teacher.

Hamilton, according to the Independent Newspaper was:

A lone mad-man in the Lee Harvey Oswald mould; an obsessive misfit who bottled up his paranoid resentment until he was ready to write himself into the national consciousness with other people’s blood.

The boys whom he ordered to strip and run around in swimming trunks laughed at him behind his back and called him Mr. Creepy. The scores of adults he knew in Dunblane recognised his weirdness and nicknamed him Spock. His podgy face and insinuating voice had made their flesh crawl, they said.

Even if they had not heard the rumours about Hamilton and his boys’ camps which had been going on for 25 years, people in Dunblane suspected that something was wrong. And to his neighbours in Kent Road, Stirling, he stood out in the poor but friendly street as a man with little to say. George Smart said he had not got a word out his neighbour in two years. He would see him walking by dressed in the classic nerd’s anorak, head down, hands shoved into pockets.

Many other Kent Road residents, who occasionally looked through Hamilton’s windows and saw the disturbing (but not blatantly pornographic) pictures of boys in swimming trunks covering his walls, painted similar portraits. Source

But that is just MSM bollocks.Thomas Hamilton’s links can in fact be traced back to Bizzy Lizzy.

Hamilton was a Freemason with very powerful friends, not least George Robertson, the ex UK Defence Secretary and Secretary General of Nato, who gave Hamilton a reference for his firearms licence.

But I digress.

 

Getting back to Peter Mandelson, the man twice drummed out of politics for wrong doing. The Whale website also had this to say about the kiddy fiddler – all of which is reference sourced:

Blair issued a D-notice to protect Peter Mandelson, when the latter was caught purchasing paedophile pornography in 2002 by Operation Ore.

Peter Mandelson’s French Hospital records are alleged to contain details of injuries caused by small furry animals used in homosexual sex acts; according to Cherie Blair he is one of the most profoundly corrupt figures in politics and coming from Tony Blair’s wife that is saying something. 

Peter Mandelson and Cherie Blair hated each other, Mandelson as top Rothschild apparatchik for Britian was rumoured to boss and bully Blair, but after a row with the French the newspapers were tipped off anonymously that Frederic Mitterrand was paying young boys for sex, but a small security firm phone tapping for a newspaper, claimed the tip came from Mandelsons people.  

The NSA whistleblower David Murphy-Fawkes has said they listened in to all Tony Blairs calls, as the US senate saw him as a lightweight ‘Pinocchio’ figure.

In march 2003 Peter Mandelson officially endorsed Leo Gillan as his political candidate, who then lost out to a man in a monkey suit, ‘hangus’ the monkey was offering a free banana to schoolchildren, ‘hangus’ was an in joke on the campaign to hang war criminals such as Saddam Hussein and Tony Blair. 

Mandelson while business minister showed his true metal while holidaying on Deripaskas yacht, now Deripaska is banned under organized crime regs in the USA, but according to the Daily Mail 23rd May 2010, Nat Rothschild, Deripaska and Mandelson shook hands on a £500 million aluminum deal that cost many Britons their jobs, much of this is said to be in chemtrail drops.

These 3 were joked about in the MI5 canteen as ‘the axis of evil’ and ‘the 3 jewboys’ and when Mandelson was admitted into a French hospital recently with prostate problems, the French doctors report told of felching injuries, felching is the gay sport where a cardboard tube is pushed into the rectum and a small furry animal slid down inside, our Peter apparently was scratched internally rather badly. 

Peter Mandelson is controlling director of the NSPCC, and when Margaret Hodge ( Oppenheimer) was children’s minister she lived next door to Tony Blair, they also knew childline funders Sarah Caplin and Esther Rantzen, who are connected to TV mogul Michael Grade. Source

 

Funny how the Daily Mail neglected to mention all this don’t cha think?

Instead of bigging up the Paedo Princess, this is the kind of stuff that the useless Chimps should be reporting to the public.

“Be fair Spiv, the articles are about the prospect of the couple re-marrying” .

Fuck off, who gives a fuck about whether or not the useless, wastes of Fresh Air get married again or not.

Never the less, if it is relevance to the articles that you want, why the fuck, when reporting on the Ducks objection to the marriage, did the Daily Mail neglect to mention the fact that the Perverted old bastard was fucking Porky Pig’s Mother, Susan Barrantes  for long enough… Just one of many, many affairs Phil has had while being married to the Queen of England.

The following is from the Daily Mail:

After Kirkwood and Cordet, numerous other famous and beautiful women have been alleged to have been Philip’s lovers. 

They include the Countess of Westmorland, wife of the Queen’s Master of the Horse, the novelist Daphne du Maurier, wife of the Comptroller of the Royal Household, the actresses Merle Oberon and Anna Massey, the TV personality Katie Boyle, the Duchess of York’s mother, Susan Barrantes, the Duchess of Abercorn, wife of the Lord Steward of the Royal Household, the Queen’s first cousin, Princess Alexandra, and Philip’s glamorous carriage-driving companion, Lady Romsey. Of these, Daphne du Maurier was merely a casual acquaintance. Katie Boyle has rubbished suggestions of intimacy.

Anna Massey met Philip only once socially. And the Duchess of Abercorn, while admitting to ‘a highly charged chemistry’ with Philip, denied any physical relationship, adding that ‘the passion was in the ideas’. 

To a female journalist who once had the temerity to question him about the rumours of extra-marital infidelities, Philip barked: ‘Good God, woman, I don’t know what sort of company you keep. 

‘Have you ever stopped to think that for the past 40 years I have never moved anywhere without a policeman accompanying me? So how the hell could I get away with anything like that?’ Source

You will notice that there was no denial about the Duck’s affair with Fergies Mother amongst that lot.

And then there is this from the Telegraph:

Inside, Australian readers were offered a “sizzling extract” from a book “they daren’t publish in Britain”. The book’s author, Nicholas Davies, purported to reveal “a shocking world of royal adultery, passion and betrayal” and stated – as fact, not surmise – that the Duke of Edinburgh’s liaisons with his cousin, Princess Alexandra, with the film star Merle Oberon, and with the Duchess of York’s mother, Susan Barrantes (among others!) were the reason “why the Queen banned her husband from her bed”. Source

Funnily enough, Susan Barrantes was killed after being decapitated in a car crash:

She was killed instantly. In a chilling echo of Diana’s death, it is understood she was not wearing a seat belt. By a tragic coincidence the Renault driver, 60-year-old Jose Maria Rodriguez, was a close family friend. He suffered a broken ankle. 

Mrs Barrantes’ 25-year-old nephew Rafael Barrantes, who was travelling with her, miraculously survived the crash. He was in hospital last night being treated for shock, cuts and bruises. 

The force of the impact was so great the vehicles ended up 60 yards apart. Last night, police suggested one reason for the accident might be that both drivers were dazzled by headlights. The road is narrow and twisty with no white centre line. 

Mrs Barrantes’ Rover was completely crushed with the sleek car reduced to a barely recognisable lump of twisted steel and fittings. Source

And this from Wikipedia

On 19 September 1998, while leaving for the ranch where she kept ponies, the Rover 75 she was driving collided with a Renault catering truck on a two-lane highway in flat countryside. The driver of the truck suffered a broken ankle, but Barrantes was decapitated and killed, age 61.

Just saying.

 

Course, at the end of the day, both of the following Daily Mail articles are bollocks.

In fact, the chances of Princess Andrew re-marrying the Duchess of Porkchops is about as likely as Bizzy Lizzie giving me an MBE for services to journalism.

Don’t believe the truth.

Over and out.

 

Andy and Fergie Part II? Friends say it is only a matter of time before the Yorks get married again 17 years after their break-up

  • Duke and Duchess of York, both 53, live at Royal Lodge in Windsor together
  • Duke of York has financially supported his ex-wife since their divorce in 1996
  • Both have had other partners but are close and raised their daughter Beatrice and Eugenie together
  • Revelation comes after Fergie joined her ex-husband on a trip to Balmoral

By VANESSA ALLEN

PUBLISHED: 09:40, 25 August 2013 | UPDATED: 15:16, 26 August 2013

They have always been the closest of divorcees – and now the Duke and Duchess of York may have rekindled their romance.

Friends say Prince Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah, both 53, have found love again, almost two decades after their marriage ended.

The Duchess, who has continued to live at Royal Lodge in Windsor with the Duke, issued a strongly worded denial following reports they were a couple again.

Together again: Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, pictured in 1995 shortly before their divorce, are said to have rekindled their romance

Together again: Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, pictured in 1995 shortly before their divorce, are said to have rekindled their romance

Wedding bells: Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, pictured on their wedding day in 1986 at Westminster Abbey, have been living together at the Royal Lodge in Berkshire

Wedding bells: Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, pictured on their wedding day in 1986 at Westminster Abbey, have been living together at the Royal Lodge in Berkshire

Royal ride: Fergie was driven to the airport by her former husband while her daughters Beatrice and Eugenie travelled in the back seat

Royal ride: Fergie was driven to the airport by her former husband Prince Andrew while her daughters Beatrice and Eugenie travelled in the back seat ahead of a family visit to Balmoral

The once disgraced Duchess of York has flown to Balmoral to spend the weekend with the Queen, it has today been revealed

Back in the fold: The once disgraced Duchess of York flew to Balmoral to spend the weekend with the QueenBut friends have described them as so close that many consider a remarriage is on the cards.

One said: ‘Mark my words, they will remarry. It is only a matter of time.’The appearance of Sarah at Balmoral earlier this month only fuelled the speculation about the strength of their relationship.

Both Andrew and Sarah joined daughters Beatrice, 25, and Eugenie, 23, for a weekend at the Queen’s Scottish Highlands retreat.

More…

It was Sarah’s first invitation back to the castle since 1992 when newspaper photographs were published showing her ‘financial adviser’ John Bryan sucking her toes. She was staying at Balmoral at the time.

Despite her divorce and subsequent exclusion from the Royal Family’s inner circle, the Duke and Duchess have always remained on friendly terms.

Both have had other relationships but friends said neither had found lasting happiness after their divorce in 1996.

Royal opinion: The Queen has long been said to have remained fond of her former daughter-in-law, but Prince Philip is said to be baffled by Fergie and Prince Andrew's relationship

Royal opinion: The Queen has long been said to have remained fond of her former daughter-in-law, but Prince Philip is said to be baffled by Fergie and Prince Andrew’s relationship

While she has still visited Balmoral since her divorce, it is thought to be the first time she has been invited to stay in the main castle on the Queen's estate since her marriage ended in 1996

While she has still visited Balmoral since her divorce, it is thought to be the first time she has been invited to stay in the main castle on the Queen’s estate since her marriage ended in 1996The Duchess was involved with Italian Count Gaddo della Gherardesca and most recently Norwegian tycoon Geir Frantzen, who owns frozen food company Findus.

Andrew has been linked to several wealthy socialites, most notably Kazakh entrepreneur Goga Ashkenazi.Friends have suggested that the couple’s continuing ‘bond’ may have seen off their other relationships.In 1999 the Duchess told an interviewer: ‘There was no reason for Andrew and I to get divorced; there wasn’t another person in our lives to go to.

‘We got divorced because I had to go out to work, and Andrew and I believed that it wasn’t right for me to be commercial while I was still in the Royal Family.’Prince Andrew has continued to provide financial support for his ex-wife and in a 2009 interview he did not rule out remarrying.

Civil: Sarah Ferguson, pictured with her two daughters Beatrice and Eugenie on holiday in St Tropez, France, separated from Prince Andrew in 1992 but they remained on good terms

Civil: Sarah Ferguson, pictured with her two daughters Beatrice and Eugenie on holiday in St Tropez, France, separated from Prince Andrew in 1992 but they remained on good terms

Family: Prince Andrew and his former wife Sarah Ferguson pose with their daughter Beatrice following her graduation ceremony at Goldsmiths College in London in 2011

Family: Prince Andrew and his former wife Sarah Ferguson pose with their daughter Beatrice following her graduation ceremony at Goldsmiths College in London in 2011

Talking point: The Duke and Duchess of York, pictured together in London in 2000, have both previously spoken about getting married again

Talking point: The Duke and Duchess of York, pictured together in London in 2000, have both previously spoken about getting married again

Joint effort: The Duchess of York, seen holding her second daughter Princess Eugenie, and Prince Andrew have raised their two daughters together

Joint effort: The Duchess of York, seen holding her second daughter Princess Eugenie in 1990, and Prince Andrew have raised their two daughters together ‘Do we have to be married?’ he said. ‘Well, let’s put it another way, I can neither confirm nor deny the possibility. We have two great children. We still look after them.’

Some friends said they believed the couple might remarry. One said: ‘It wouldn’t surprise me at all. They are a wonderful couple together and, better still, pretty amazing parents.’

Another, who saw them recently, said: ‘There has always been this bond between them and they are incredibly close.’It is, understandably, strange to some that they still live together so many years after their divorce, but they really do get on brilliantly and are hugely supportive of each other.

Their biggest bond, however, is the girls.’Another source said: ‘Balmoral wasn’t about them being back together, that was about the Royal Family recognising that she had tried to turn her life around and that they are still a family unit after all these years.’A spokesman for the Duchess ruled out a new relationship between the pair.

He said: ‘They continue to be joint parents and best friends and try to set the best example for the girls.’

Close: The Queen, pictured next to Fergie at Princess Eugenie's christening at Sandringham in 1990, is said to remained fond of her daughter-in-law despite the scandals

Close: The Queen, pictured next to Fergie at Princess Eugenie’s christening at Sandringham in 1990, is said to remained fond of her daughter-in-law despite the scandals

Wedding bells: The Duke of York and Duchess of York, pictured on their wedding day in 1986, are said to be considering getting married for a second time

Wedding bells: The Duke of York and Duchess of York, pictured on their wedding day in 1986, are said to be considering getting married for a second time

On good terms: Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, pictured on their wedding day on the balcony at Buckingham Palace, have remained close since their divorce

On good terms: Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson, pictured on their wedding day on the balcony at Buckingham Palace, have remained close since their divorce

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2401660/Prince-Andrew-Sarah–Duchess-York-reunite.html#ixzz2dCeLJliw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

RICHARD KAY: Andrew and Fergie to remarry? Not if Prince Philip has anything to say about it!

By RICHARD KAY

PUBLISHED: 00:32, 26 August 2013 | UPDATED: 15:53, 26 August 2013

Are they on again? Could Andrew and Fergie then be the Burton and Taylor of the House of Windsor?

Are they on again? Could Andrew and Fergie then be the Burton and Taylor of the House of Windsor?

The dodgem cars were hurtling around at full speed and there were shrieks of excitement on the helter-skelter, but away from the fairground sideshows, the presence of the Duke and Duchess of York was just as much an attraction.

It was the night of Princess Beatrice’s 25th birthday party earlier this month, and the lavish outdoor entertainment at Royal Lodge in Windsor Great Park had been organised by the couple for their daughter’s friends.

Staff among the guests were struck by the relaxed and easy informality between Prince Andrew and his former wife.

‘It was quite noticeable,’ one retainer tells me. ‘They behaved more like an old married couple than an old divorced couple.

‘It was an eye-opener. There was quite a bit of joshing that they might as well get married again.’

So, might they? Yesterday it was reported that the couple had rekindled their love and that the Queen was ‘paving the way’ for them to remarry. It would certainly be a remarkable turn of events.

For 27 years, the story of the 53-year-old Andrew and Fergie, 54 in October, has amused and entertained the British public as much as it has embarrassed and humiliated the Royal Family.

Married for little more than five years when they split up over the Duchess’s adulterous liaisons, the couple have remained extraordinarily close.

The manner in which they have raised Beatrice and her younger sister Princess Eugenie, 23, is a testament to that closeness.

Aides of the Duke and Duchess are at pains to say that talk of remarriage is wrong. ‘They are extraordinarily good friends and they have remained a family unit in part for the sake of their children,’ says one figure close to the Duchess.

‘They like to say they are a good example of how a divorced couple can work together very well.’

Theirs, however, is no ordinary divorce.

They live together at Royal Lodge – the secluded mansion Andrew inherited on the death of the Queen Mother in 2002 – and the Prince, effectively, provides his former wife’s upkeep.

In return, Fergie has kept her head below the public parapet.

This, at least, has been the arrangement for the past three years since the Duchess squandered what remained of the public affection for her by offering an undercover tabloid reporter access to Andrew for £500,000.

In the ensuing furore, it was revealed that she was facing financial meltdown with debts of £2million.

Many were surprised when she turned to her ex-husband for help.

Wedding bells: The Duke of York and Duchess of York, pictured on their wedding day in 1986, are said to be considering getting married for a second time

Wedding bells: The Duke of York and Duchess of York, pictured on their wedding day in 1986, are said to be considering getting married for a second time

Joint effort: The Duchess of York, seen with daughter Princess Eugenie and Prince Andrew have stayed close and raised their two daughters together

Joint effort: The Duchess of York, seen with daughter Princess Eugenie and Prince Andrew have stayed close and raised their two daughters together

He cleared her debts and provided sanctuary, and she agreed to do the one thing she had so often failed to do – avoid embarrassing the Queen and the royals.

That was in 2010, and ever since the couple have lived under the same roof – if not sharing the same bed – and, by all accounts, managed pretty well.

There is, no doubt, a strong bond between them that seems to extend beyond the need for them to get along simply for the sake of their daughters.

The girls are, after all, adults leading independent lives. They have homes of their own, and next month Eugenie will be moving abroad to start a new life working for an auctioneer in New York.

Beatrice, meanwhile, is hoping to take up a new post within the financial industry shortly.

Last winter, the Duke and Duchess’s relationship took another turn when Andrew rented a chalet in the fashionable Swiss ski resort of Verbier.

This was a significant moment because he took the charming pine-clad house not just for the holidays but for the entire skiing season.

Andrew based himself in Switzerland and ‘commuted’ to engagements from the Alps.

All that time, ski-enthusiast Sarah remained at the chalet, arranging parties of visiting friends and quietly ‘keeping house’.

Some suggest that Sarah has a ‘hold’ over Andrew, but it is somehow more likely that any control is exercised by the Duke.

He has always felt guilty for his part in the marriage break-up, his negligence in being less attentive than he might have been to a new wife and mother struggling to cope with her royal life, as he devoted himself to his naval career.

Talking point: The Duke and Duchess of York, pictured together in London in 2006, have both previously spoken about getting married again

Talking point: The Duke and Duchess of York, pictured together in London in 2006, have both previously spoken about getting married again

But there must, surely, be more to their relationship. Why else would staff speculate about them one day remarrying?

Could Andrew and Fergie then be the Burton and Taylor of the House of Windsor, a couple who can’t live with each other but can’t also live without one another?

With the monarchy still basking in a warm glow of public approval generated principally by the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and, now, their son, Prince George, the possibility of Andrew and Sarah tying the knot for a second time might risk endangering that goodwill.

For all his derring-do in the Falklands War and his years of blameless service to the Royal Navy, the Prince is saddled with his ‘Airmiles Andy’ nickname and his boorish outbursts as a trade envoy – one of the more memorable revelations of the Wikileaks scandal.

A remarriage would certainly be an intriguing prospect.

Would it be a civil ceremony in a register office, like the one Prince Charles and Mrs Camilla Parker Bowles had in 2005?

Or a Scottish affair, such as when Andrew’s sister Princess Anne married former royal equerry Tim Laurence at Ballater, in the Highlands, in 1992?

One thing is for sure: there will be no such marriage while Prince Philip is still with us. Philip has been fiercely critical of his former daughter-in-law over the years, and of his son for apparently remaining under her spell.

‘We know he would oppose any remarriage, that’s why we all say it can only happen after he has gone,’ says a friend of the couple.

‘Andrew wouldn’t want to upset his father, indeed I don’t think he would be allowed to.’

But such chilly hostility towards Fergie is not shared by all members of the Royal Family. Earlier this month, the Duchess spent a weekend at Balmoral – although pointedly the Duke of Edinburgh was not there – as a guest of the Queen.

According to those close to Sarah, the stay was simply recognition of the fact that she has, as one close chum puts it, ‘kept her nose clean’ for the past three years.

‘She has been accepted again as part of the family.’

The Duke of Edinburgh
Queen Elizabeth

Royal seal of approval: Prince Philip has been fiercely critical of his former daughter-in-law. The Queen invited Fergie to come to Balmoral just a few weeks ago in what was seen as a significant gesture.

Although she was not invited to Prince William’s wedding to Kate Middleton in 2011, and it is highly unlikely that she will be a guest at Prince George’s christening service, there is another royal wedding – admittedly still on the distant horizon – which could see Fergie back in the fold. Her daughter Beatrice’s.

There is no official engagement between the Princess and her long-standing boyfriend Dave Clark, of course, but many believe their marriage is a question of when, not if.

Clark, 30, who works for Virgin tycoon Sir Richard Branson’s empire, has been around for so long that many thought they were already engaged and merely waiting for a break in the busy royal itinerary to accommodate another wedding.

As the mother of the bride, the Duchess would have to be there. And she could not be consigned to some distant pew – she would have to take her seat alongside the royals.

After all the years of upheaval, Prince Andrew has remained steadfastly loyal to Fergie.

Girlfriends have come and gone, but he’s always ended up going back to his ex-wife. She is no longer the rackety figure of fun she once was, spending her time working on children’s books and developing a film idea on the life of Prince Albert.

So how about a double wedding? Beatrice and her beau, and Andrew and Fergie. Now that would be a royal first – and every bit as exciting as the rollercoaster at that birthday fairground extravaganza.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2401940/Prince-Andrew-Fergie-remarry-Not-Prince-Philip-say-it.html#ixzz2dCnIKQJe
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook