Oct 2 2014
Princess Diana: The Last Phone Call
Christopher Spivey
Ever get the feeling that you were being played?
I received an e-mail yesterday from a woman with a Muslim sounding name, although I must stress that ethnicity wasn’t mentioned at all and had nothing to do with the subject matter… Not in the way you might think anyway.
You see, the lady in question claims to be the ex-girlfriend of an MI5 intelligence operative whom she called ‘Adam’ – not his real name.
She then went on to tell me that ‘Adam’ had allowed her to listen to the contents of the last phone call ever made by Princess Diana, which she alleges was covertly recorded by MI5 or MI6 somewhere around 2 hours before she died.
The following is a cut and paste of the e-mail in full:
Hi Chris,
I like to first say I like your articles, they are very informative, eye-opening, scary and funny and I like the different issues you write about.
I wish I had at the beginning gone to the alternative media instead of the corrupt lying evil MSM who for two months have been stalling, blackmailing, and trying to get me to accept a twisted version of my story which I have refused or get back in contact with my ex intelligence officer boyfriend who let me hear Princess Diana last recorded telephone conversation and get that tape where Di is speaking with a female family member, one of her sisters I believe otherwise they weren’t publishing.
I believe they have known about this last recorded phone conversation for a long time and they are desperate for the tape, one newspaper the publicist I was in contact with told me I would get one million if I got the recorded produced a picture with Adam, not his real name in case GCHQ is reading this and or location where agents live in Victoria.
I know you don’t believe Princess Diana’s car crash was an accident but I do now, I believe it is just fortunate for the royals if you can describe it like that.
I really don’t know what to do I really need your help and advice because they left me pennyless as I was relying on them to pay me the five figure number which they won’t give me now because I won’t play their dirty game.
I couldn’t believe it I started crying and said I wouldn’t do anything stupid. He then asked me who my ex intelligence boyfriend was and when I refused he said, ‘I know you have no money so why don’t I send a car round to your flat to talk to one of our female officers in a hotel.’ I then said “No” and put down the phone.
Please check my blog and read Princess Diana-The last Phone Call and you will understand. I have posted it on my blog for my own safety now, I can’t send you a Word Document because my laptop isn’t charged and I’m using my phone which I’m charging at the library.
Now, what makes me suspicious is the fact that her account of that phone call – which I have republished in full lower down the page* in case it should disappear – conveniently clears up every single ‘myth’ surrounding Diana’s death, completely absolves the royal parasites of any involvement and is more or less an exact copy of the official line given to us in the press.
Course, I am sure that many of you now, already have a number of questions forming in your heads, such as: Why was the tape recording not released to dispel all of the ‘conspiracy theories’ that have been aired in print at one time or another.
However, the answer to that and other questions are all taken care of in the woman’s account, but I can tell you that basically – according to the Paget Report – there was supposedly no monitoring of phone calls or surveillance taking place on Diana at the time of her death… Which simply wasn’t true.
Moreover, I didn’t need to read the account of the alleged MI5 phone conversation to know that was a lie. You see, I found out a long time ago that Operation Paget and the subsequent Paget Report was nothing more than a work of fiction.
Indeed, in a far from finished, extremely detailed and evidenced, 50,000 + word article about the death of Diana that I began writing a couple of years ago, heavily based on the flaws, inaccuracies and blatant lies that were set out as fact in the Paget Report, I have named names and proven beyond all reasonable doubt – or will have by the time I am finished writing the article – that Diana was in fact murdered.
Unfortunately, and as many of my long time readers will already know, I have had to shelve finishing that article due to the huge amount of time that I would need to set aside in order to complete the project – time of which I simply do not have to spare at the moment.
I do however consider the piece – thus far – to be one of my greatest achievements to date and indeed intend to provide the answer to one anomaly which had cropped up following Diana’s death, that as far as I am aware, no one to date has ever been able to provide an answer for.
And since that 50,000 + word article is on one of the two computers of mine stolen by the police on the 31st of July 2014, to my way of thinking, that kinda makes this woman’s e-mail all the more suspect.
Moreover, whilst there can be no denying that the account you are about to read was written by someone with a great deal of knowledge about the facts surrounding the build up and death of the princess, I should just mention that I do know an awful lot more about the described events.
However, having said that, do read her account with an open mind and see what you think.
PRINCESS DIANA: THE LAST PHONE CALL

After two months of been knocked back and fourth by the MSM I have decided to tell my story on my own blog and let you, the public know what I have known and kept secret for nearly two years as Princess Diana deserves better and Mohammed Al-Fayed, even though is a grieving father and fighting the Establishment who still refuse to give him a passport, has his own agenda to push.I met my ex-boyfriend two years ago and in the winter of 2012, after dating for 8 months we were discussing marriage and that’s when Adam told me he worked for Mi5 as a desk officer, analysing data, listening and watching surveillance videos and audio to collect intelligence.
I didn’t believe Adam at first, I thought he was pulling my leg and I asked him to prove it and Adam agreed happily. Adam was smart and had a first class degree in computer science and mathematics from Cambridge university so I wasn’t going to be that shocked if Mi5 did swoop up my genius boyfriend to work for them as he was a computer whizz and a good problem solver whatever the situation.
After dining out, Adam and I went back to Adam’s glamourous flat in Victoria, London, where I now presume was a safe house where other agents lived with a high security alarm system which was fitted in all the flats inside the beautiful white crisp stucco-fronted apartments block with vibrant flowers adorned on all the windowsills and tall grey square pots containing colourful plants at either side of the big black communal door. Adam let me in and he made us a cup of tea, we then sat at his dining table where his Macbook Pro laptop was and he put one of his USB memory sticks in the USB port.
I asked Adam was he allowed to bring work home if he was working on top secret sensitive intel? Adam told me he worked from home from time to time and he was allowed to as he had security clearance. I asked him whether that was safe as I worried for his safety as anyone could locate him via his IP address and harm him if not worse kill him if they knew he was an agent. Adam reassured me he couldn’t be found because he was using highly sophisticated non-detecting, anonymity military software that was specially designed for British intelligence officers to use.
Adam warned me what I was about to hear was going to shock me so “be prepared” he said and when he played the audio I couldn’t believe who I was actually listening to, I had goosebumps all over.
Adam then pressed play so as to let me listen to the recording that he said was recorded on 30th of August 1997 by secret services, just an hour or so before the tragic accident were Princess Diana was talking to a female family member. Although the Princess was upset and annoyed at first she was more cheerful at the end of the conversation as I recall.
I recognised Diana, the Princess of Wales voice straight away and felt she was clearly upset when she stated to the person on the otherend of the phone that a journalist had called her from a national newspaper in England, I can’t remember his name or what newspaper he was with, I think if you pressed me on it, I would say it was News of the World or the Daily Mail.
This journalist told her that there was news Diana was going to announce her engagement to Dodi Al-Fayed at The Ritz Hotel or tell the world she was pregnant and he wanted to know if there was any truth in it and would she give a television interview or say a few words for his paper if it was. Diana told the reporter it was not true and wanted to know why did the media think this as she had never stated it to her media contacts or told her friends or family? The reporter told her that the news came from The Ritz Hotel in Paris and Dodi was seen been driven to a jewellery shop called Repossi even though it was only a short distance away from the hotel and on the same street.” I slammed the phone down” Diana said as she couldn’t believe her ears.
The person she was talking to on the other side of the phone said she was certain it was the Al-Fayed’s camp for sure who gave the order to talk to the paparazzi and Media so what did Dodi have to say for himself? Her family member wanted to know. Diana said she confronted Dodi about it and he said to her he was going to propose later on in the evening as he was fully committed to her and serious about settling down. However Princess Diana said it was too soon and that they only had been together for less than 30 days and she had not consulted her boys or told her family.
Princess Diana also said she told Dodi Al-Fayed the relationship was going at high-speed which she didn’t like and she wanted to take things slower as she had just come out of a serious relationship and she didn’t want anything to overshadow her anti-landmine campaign which she set her heart on to ban landmines internationally.
Princess Diana also told Dodi she didn’t want anymore presents as she already accepted his £3,000 Bulgari yellow gold ring paved with diamonds as a friendship ring which she wore on the fourth finger of her right hand not her left hand denoting an engagement and thus adding on to her very expensive Bulgari jewellery gift set from Dodi which included a diamond necklace, bracelet and earrings. In-fact photographs taken on August 30, 1997, just hours before the crash show Princess Diana wearing the Bulgari friendship ring on the fourth finger of her right hand.
Also Mr Al-Fayed, who had been driven to the Jewellery store, less than 100 yards away on the same street as his fathers hotel, had gone to Alberto Repossi’s Paris branch store but ended up leaving with just a catalogue and then returned to The Ritz Hotel empty handed on the 30th of August 1997.
What is shocking is that Dodi didn’t even take the time or care to choose a ring for Diana himself which you would think would be very important to him however he sent Claude Roulet, the assistant to The Ritz’s president to choose an engagement ring, which was the cheapest engagement ring in the store, for Princess Diana instead and Claude went to the shop and chose the rings and left with the bag containing the two rings and deposited the Repossi package in the hotel safe.
The cheap ring which was £11,600 from the “Dis-moi-oui” range which meant tell me yes, was recovered, in its unopened box, from Dodi’s flat in Paris following the crash but how did it get there since it was in the safe in the hotel? Also the second ring which was worth more at £60,000 was returned to Mr Repossi’s shop on September 3 1997, three days after the crash in the Alma underpass, so why wasn’t the “Dis-moi-oui” engagement ring returned too as Diana didn’t want it or was shown it by Dodi and was in-fact bought by his father.
Princess Diana also said Dodi apologised profusely and said he hadn’t thought about what he had done properly and promised not to bring it up again until they discussed it a couple of months down the line in their relationship and asked for her forgiveness.
Diana also stated she felt the pressure for her and Dodi to marry came from Muhammed Al-Fayed who wanted her to announce an engagement with Dodi outside the Ritz hotel that night just like she had done with Charles outside Buckingham Palace in 1981 for publicity and to make his son and family look good. This is when I heard Princess Diana also say she felt her new relationship was crowded again, laughing in disbelief.
There’s three of us in this relationship she said, “Me, Dodi and his father”. Diana said this because she felt Dodi was running back to his father to tell him everything they did and Muhammed was telling Dodi what to do and was pulling the strings, she felt their eagerness to please her meant only one thing, that they wanted something, just like Charles used her as a brood mare to produce an heir and a spare, the Al-Fayeds were using her for social climbing and social acceptance in British high society.
Princess Diana also said she felt the photograph of her in her leopard-print swimsuit, were she had a noticible bulge was doctured to make news headlines to say she was pregnant and she was not, she said. “I wouldn’t have a child out of wedlock never, never’” Diana said, “I’m not pregnant”, she reassured her family member. “Thank God” came the reply.
Princess Diana also said she believed if she and Dodi left The Ritz Hotel that would hopefully signal to the paparazzi and the media that there wasn’t going to be an imminent engagement/pregnancy announcement to be made and hoped by leaving the Ritz Hotel this lie would die down and the paparazzi would lose interest.
Diana also stated in the phone conversation she didn’t feel comfortable staying in The Ritz Hotel where she just refused Dodi’s engagement ring so she told Dodi she wanted to go back to his apartment which was located at Rue Arsene-Houssayh as thats where all her belongings were, as she wanted to go straight to the airport from Dodi’s apartment to go back home to london in the morning instead of leaving the Ritz Hotel to go to Dodi’s apartment the next day.
Diana also said in the phone call that she felt Dodi was “insensitive and insane” to suggest to her that she would live with him at the Villa Windsor, “which was full of ghosts and bad luck”, if there relationship developed further, as the French Government had leased the property out to Dodi’s father Muhammed Al-Fayed, which in-fact was also where the King of Britain, Edward the eighth lived with his American wife Wallis Simpson when he abdicated in 1936 and they lived there in exile.
Diana said she thought she would be sending out a wrong message if she went back there and she certainly didn’t want history to record the mother of the future King of England had lived there also as it was painful time for the Windsors and an anxious time for her countrymen as it flung her country into a crisis as well as feeling it would damage her reputation and cause more problems with her and The Royal Family which she didn’t want. Diana let out an angry sigh. “For fucks sake”, she said, “Why does life have to be so doleful? Why can’t I be happy in love”, she asked? The woman on the other line said she hoped she would be happy in love and suggested she get back in contact with Dr Hasnat Khan as he made her happy.
Princess Diana agreed but worried he would break her heart again because he was so reluctant to be seen with her and consider a real future with her. However she seemed optimistic and hoped he would take her back because she still loved him deep down but she was going to call Jemima Khan to see if Imran had spoken to Hasnat on her behalf first.
The person on the other end asked her happily if she would dump Dodi for Hasnat? “In a heartbeat,” Diana said, he would always be her Mr Wonderful and she was already considering dumping Dodi as he was her rebound guy. The princess also said although she felt Dodi and her had lots of similarities, as they were both divorced, both came from wealthy families and lived luxuries lifestyles, both were raised by their fathers but they had nothing else in common, especially when it came to “work-ethics” which Diana thought Dodi lacked incredibly because he wasn’t independent financially from his father and she worried about his bad reputation and she hadn’t forgotten about Kelly Fisher and questioned how long Dodi would stay faithful to her.
The princess also said she regretted parting easily from her priceless fathers cufflinks which she gave to Dodi as a meaningful present to keep safe for her. “I will get Paul to get it back,” she said as she didn’t know if she wanted to see Dodi again once she returned to the UK as she really wanted to get back with Hasnat and marry him and not Dodi. The female family member said she was delighted Diana was seriously contemplating on dumping Dodi as she didn’t want her to be associated with the Al-Fayed family.I also want to say that I remember Princess Diana saying the love of her life was Prince Charles and Camilla ruined her life and Charles had broken her heart. I will never forget how she said it as she said it with so much hurt in her voice and pain in her heart. Her family member told her there was nothing she can do about it and move on and assured her she will get over it.
Princess Diana then happily said she couldn’t wait to get back to the UK to see her boys who she was “missing lots” and give them presents she had bought for them.
Adam stopped playing the audio and I didn’t get to hear the rest of what Diana and the other person were saying, I think they were about to say their goodbyes. After hearing what I just did though I was absoloutely gobsmacked. I asked Adam why didn’t Mi5 release the audio so that the public could hear Princess Diana, in her own words saying she wasn’t pregnant and didn’t want to marry Dodi Al-Fayed and in-fact she was seriously considering whether to dump him as she wanted to get back with the man she truly loved and had been with for two years, Dr Hasnat Khan, as her public display of affection and gallavanting with Dodi was only to inflame jealousy out of Hasnat and persuade him to think twice and marry her.
Adam said that these tapes were classified and would never be released, maybe in 50 or 100 years time he said but not now as Mi5 wouldn’t want everyone to know they do actually listen and record peoples phone calls even though everyone knows they do. Adam then asked me if I wanted a copy of the audio. I refused right away because A) I was scared to have the last recording of Princess Diana talking privately on the phone to one of her family members in my flat and B) I didn’t think I had the right to keep it.
However I did grill Adam regarding how strange it was Princess Diana did die in a car crash just as she predicted. Adam then calmly replied that Diana did also think that Mi5 was going to blow her up in a helicopter and do away with her. Adam said the princess had a tumultuous relationship with the Windsors which affected her mind and made her paranoid and think her life was always in danger because she felt like an outsider who was never wanted or accepted, this feeling he said stemmed from childhood.
The Windsors would never dream of doing that Adam said defiantly, fighting their corner. But what about the white Fiat Uno I asked confused and the motorcyclists? Adam said it was the pursuing paparazzi and an ordinary citizen called Le Van Thanh who was driving the white Fiat Uno he repainted red, hours after the crash and replaced the rear tail light of his car but because electricity supplies were cut off due to maintanace work, the traffic cameras were not working and Le Van Thanh got away with it but it was an accident and not an assassination plot.
I was shocked and relieved to hear Adams explanation because all I ever heard was Al-Fayed senior saying it was James Andanson who committed suicide three years after the crash in 2000.
I felt really sad and said I wish Princess Diana never met Dodi Al-Fayed as I believe she still would have been alive today. A woman like Diana, Adam said had an intriguing personality where if she immediately had an interest in a person she met at a moment’s contact, Diana would be flirtatious and aggressively pursue them as she wanted to love and be loved out of desperation, despair and lonelyness Adam said calling it the Diana Delusion.
I told Adam I felt really sorry for the princess and felt she was very vulnerable woman. I also couldnt get my head around how a beautiful woman like Princess Diana who was a great speaker, who had charm, was very much liked and a great humanitarian was struggling so much in her personal life.
Adam agreed and said it would have been best if the Princess had stayed with Hasnat and eventually the stubborn git would have come round, he said laughing. Adam thought Hasnat would have put up with the immense media intetest and paparazzi intrution as his love for Diana would have helped him tolerate it if he really loved her and couldn’t live with out her.
The truth is Adam told me frankly Muhammed Al-Fayed does not want to accept his son Dodi, who concocted the crazy idea to evade the paparazzi and leave from the rear exit of The Ritz Hotel, which by the way Mr Al-Fayed himself allegedly approved of in a telephone conversation he had with his son, plus his employees may have been responsible for the death of princess Diana because they were leaving an Al-Fayed owned hotel in an Al-Fayed owned car, being driven by an Al-Fayed employee who was head of security and not a chauffer as he didnt have chauffeur qualification to drive the Mercedes or has ever driven the Al-Fayed family anywhere, had been drinking that night and tipping off the paparazi as he had cash stuffed in his pocket which in all likelihood had probably being given to him by them, was driving at a reckless and excessive speed to evade the paparazzi that led to the tragic and unfortunate crash on August 31, 1997 in Paris.
Finally I have decided to tell my story, well what I know, because I was one of those people who believed Princess Diana was pregnant and about to get married due to media sensationalising Mohammed Al-Fayed claims that the security services killed princess Diana on the orders of Prince Philip and Diana’s sisters Sarah and Jane were in on it as well as her brother-in-law Robert Fellowes, even Al-Fayed bodyguards as well as many other people to cover up the murder because princess Diana was pregnant and about to marry a Muslim man which is not true as the Royal Family and Prince Charles had given their blessings to Diana and Hasnat Khan’s relationship and Hasnat is a Muslim.
Further more Adam told me regarding the SAS claims that they killed Princess Diana is upsurd and total fabrication because Mi5 and Mi6 para-military wing is called Triple S, which stands for Secret Security Squad and they are recruited from the SAS, SBS SFSG etc.. and they have to sign the Official Secrets Act and be trained in the world of espionage.
Thank you for reading,
Rani
1st Oct 2014
*I do not normally republish articles in full, preferring to insert a continue reading link back to the original source as a matter of common courtesy to the author. However, I have already provided you with the reason as to why I have republished this article in full but I would never the less appreciate you extending the same courtesy to Rani by clicking on the SOURCE link below. Thank you.









October 2, 2014 @ 8:38 am
What a crock of shit, didn’t even read all what she had to say. There is no way she can’t remember what paper it was but can remember everything single thing she said. What I did read just sounds fake. Who describes their partner as “A problem solver whatever the situation”. Sounds like she’s writing his CV!
October 2, 2014 @ 9:43 am
thats exactly what i thought, crock of shit.
October 2, 2014 @ 9:46 pm
I believe every word the lady said, she sounds SOOO honest, I think I would like to take her on holiday to my villa on the moon, we could sit on the beach or go for a ride on my old racehorse Shergar, or visit my jam butty mine just a few craters away from the villa! Well, she started it with her bullshit story, what a lying bitch! Her story is as full of shit as a tramp’s underpants, and has more holes in it too!
October 5, 2014 @ 10:33 am
Hi Louise-didn’t know i had another name sake on this site!!!!……xx
October 5, 2014 @ 10:58 am
Hi Louise2, my apologies, but i’ve had to edit your user name slightly to avoid confusion.
October 2, 2014 @ 2:27 pm
i completely agree. a total load of shit.
chris you are being preoccupied with utter dross, it was a trick, it’s a distraction.
next-up mickey mouse calls in claiming to the location of curly’s gold.
October 3, 2014 @ 1:18 pm
Well Chris – it was a blinking long phone call! Pathetic and takes you to be a fool! If this is OK with you I will be sharing this our Abolish the British Monarchy Page on FB – they need a laugh. Cannot wait for your book – and I am sure “others” will be too. Take care of yourself.
October 7, 2014 @ 5:54 pm
I agree…have you ever heard such bollocks..Adam says the tape is hush hush and maybe released in 50 to 100 years maybe…….but he has a copy and even offers her a copy ? So much she remembered as well….never in a million.
October 2, 2014 @ 8:42 am
Chris. Before even getting to her reproduced blog and you saying you don’t believe it, it just sounded like misinformation to me. What a load of shite her “blog” is. Especially the detail of what type of computer he had, just sounds like she had a bad hair day.
Having stolen your computers, here’s my speculation for what its worth. I think they would like you to publish something, that they can then either arrest your for (legitimately), or can rubbish everything you say when they expose it as BS, bringing down the value of your site.
Just sayin …
October 3, 2014 @ 10:55 am
Can someone PLEASE tell me how it is possible to “arrange” a car crash in a car built like a tank and GUARANTEE that the rear seat passengers will suffer fatal injuries?
I hate to bring something called logic into the “argument” but whether or not this woman is lying or not, there is nothing at all to even suggest that this was anything but a tragic accident.
This is just another conspiracy theory too far.
October 3, 2014 @ 12:19 pm
So, you dismiss this as nonsense:
The onboard computer chip controls, amongst other things, navigation, acceleration, steering and braking of a vehicle. Considering that Princess Diana’s death was due to a car crash, the fact that the Mercedes S280 involved in the crash had its onboard computer chip stolen some days earlier (and nothing else mind you…suggesting the car-snatchers were no ordinary thieves) pushes the pervasive accident account onto firmer conspiracy territory.
October 3, 2014 @ 12:25 pm
Ponder this too:
World famous explorer and former SAS officer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes did indeed confirm the relatively common use of this assassination method with particular reference to the death in England of one Major Michael Marman in a car accident that bears uncanny resemblance to that of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul.
So what could have been the motive behind the theft of the Mercedes Benz S280 that was involved in the Paris tunnel crash on August 31, 1997?
Well let’s see; assuming you want to execute a very sensitive, high profile assassination but at the same time create as little fuss as possible, the best way to go about it is to make it look like an accident.
Keeping that in mind the disappearance of the onboard computer chip from the “Crash S280” then makes a lot of sense. Steal the car, remove the onboard computer chip, replace the old chip with a new doctored onboard computer chip that allows another party to gain remote control over the car and tada…
You’ve got yourselves a genuine accident in the making!
Furthermore, very suspiciously, the stolen Mercedes Benz S280 was the only vehicle “available” to the Princess and her companions that night! Talk about leaving nothing to chance!
Initial reports leaked to the press suggested that the Mercedes Benz S280 involved in the crash had been zooming at speeds in the neighborhood of 120 mph! If this were translated into km/h this would come out to a staggering 192 kilometers per hour! In fact reports of the day had the speedometer of the car stuck at 196 kilometers per hour (122 mph).
The truth of the matter is if the car had been traveling anywhere near those speeds, seat-belt-or-not NOBODY would have survived that crash (the only person to survive the crash was bodyguard Trevor Rhys-Jones who sat in the passenger seat and is widely believed to have been an operative of MI6 or MI5 branches of the British Secret Service).
Many professional drivers have decried the authority-cited-speeds (120mph region) as being absolutely preposterous and from the evidence available to them put the car at about 60 mph (96km/h) at the time of the accident.
To date, Mercedes Benz has never been able to examine the car for the simple reason the authorities never allowed them. This in itself is very strange because Mercedes Benz experts should have been party to the panel of experts examining the car! Why?
How about if for no other reason than they built and engineered the vehicle and thus would have been in an excellent position to determine how fast the car was going and what caused the various impact damage to the vehicle.
It would appear though that an internal investigation conducted by Mercedes Benz (albeit with the rather limited information available to them) seemed to suggest a speed of 60mph was far more reasonable than the 120mph spread by authorities and that the safety protective features of the Mercedes more or less behaved as expected.
This may explain why Trevor Rhys-Jones who was seat-belted in the passenger seat and thereby in the least likely position for surviving such an accident survived! (The passenger seat is known in the industry as “The Death Seat”).
The Mercedes engineered safety mechanisms that helped preserve Mr Jones’ life, incorporate the engine block being forced under the car and not into the passenger compartment following the tremendous force from such a collision as the one that occurred in the Paris tunnel that night.
ht tp://princess-diana-life-n-death.blog … tolen.html
October 3, 2014 @ 12:38 pm
(It should be noted that some of the witnesses’ surnames are not available because of the very real fear they had at the time that they would meet an untimely death!)
Thierry H: He saw a car blocking the exit that would have allowed Princess Diana’s Mercedes to take the Place de la Concorde and thus avoid the tunnel at Point d’Alma. The car had several men and Thierry’s assumption at the time was that those men were paparazzi (but were they really?).
Brenda Wells: The secretary from London who “reportedly went missing” following her statement to the French police. She told them that on her way home from a party with friends, she was forced off the road by a large and powerful motorbike ridden by two individuals as she approached the tunnel. The motorbike was tailing Princess Diana’s limo at high speed, in conjunction with another smaller car (Fiat Uno? Although her account describes this car as dark colored). In her own words: “After a party with my friends, I was returning to my home. A motorbike with two men forced me off the road. It was following a big car. Afterwards in the tunnel there were very strong lights like flashes. After that, a black car arrived. The big car had come off the road. I stopped and five or six motorbikes arrived and started taking photographs.”
The whereabouts of Brenda Wells are currently unknown but what is known is that soon after giving her statement to the French Police and after both she and her husband were warned to go into hiding and never speak about what they had witnessed…PHUT! Just like that she vanished…fell off the face of the earth!
Francoise & Valerie Levistre: Since they were driving in front of the Diana Mercedes they were strategically located to bear close witness to what exactly happened in the tunnel. The following account was recorded by Reuters on September 4th, 1997 from their home in Normandy France:
“I said to my wife that there must be a big shot behind us with a police escort. Then I went down into the tunnel and, again in my rearview mirror I saw the car in the middle of the tunnel with the motorcycle on its left, pulling ahead and then swerving to the right directly in front of the car…as the motorcycle swerved and before the car lost control, there was a flash of light but then I was out of the tunnel and, but did not see the impact…I immediately pulled my car over to the curb but my wife said ‘Let’s get out of here. It’s a terror attack.'” (Reuters, Paris, Sourced from Internet 4/9/97).
Levistre also described the motorbike as being ridden by two individuals.
Gaelle L: Gaelle and her boyfriend Benoit were approaching the tunnel from the opposite direction in the opposing lane on the other side of the tunnel. Here’s her account: “As we entered the Alma tunnel, we heard a loud noise of screeching tires. At that moment, in the opposite lane, we saw a large car approaching at high speed. The car swerved to the left, then went back to the right and crashed into the wall with its horn blaring. I should note that in front of this car, there was another smaller car. I think this vehicle was black, but I’m not sure. Behind the big car there was a large motorcycle. I can’t be sure how many riders were on it.”
Souad Mouffakir: Far too terrified in1997 to truthfully report what she (and her husband of the time) witnessed in the tunnel, six years after the crash, Souad recanted her earlier testimony with the following damning account! She stated, quite understandably, that she’d remained silent for six years about what she witnessed because she’d feared for her life. Her story was narrated to The People (note no money changed hands for the story).
Souad Mouffakir claims that she and her husband (Mohamed Medjahdi) were in a car that was traveling right in front of Princess Diana’s Mercedes in the tunnel on the night of August 31, 1997. Through the rear window she noticed a Fiat Uno approaching them very rapidly, but rather than overtake them it slowed down so that both cars were parallel.
As Souad put it, “It was very strange behavior and I got frightened. The white car was only centimeters from ours. I stared over to the driver and I will never forget him.” She then continues to describe how the man’s demeanor and manner appeared very strange as if his thoughts were far…far away. She describes the man as being of Mediterranean descent and that she surmised he was short because his head barely cleared the steering wheel. In the back seat of the car sat what she described as a huge Alsatian.
She continues, “I became very scared, I thought he was a madman and I told Mohamed to speed away. We did that and a moment later we heard the screech of tyres. I looked round and saw a black Mercedes sliding out of control at 45 degrees, coming straight at us. I saw the car impact into the pillar. I did not realize that I had just seen the crash that killed Diana. I saw the chauffeur thrown forward in to the steering wheel. I knew he had been killed immediately.” (Note: text in quote marks was sourced from The People interview.)
Source is ht tp://princess-diana-life-n-death.blogspot.co.uk/2007/07/princess-diana-death-eye-witness.html
October 3, 2014 @ 12:44 pm
Moments before the crash, record producer Jacques Morel says he saw several figures (about a dozen) hanging out in the tunnel for no apparent reason. Driving home with his wife on that night this is how he described the peculiar scene: ” As we entered the Alma tunnel I looked to my left and saw about a dozen shady figures on a tiny pavement by the side of the opposite carriageway…They were all standing in a long line. The sight was unforgettable. The pavement is less than 30cm (12in or 1ft) wide and next to fast traffic. They would have been breathing in petrol fumes and it was very dirty down there. It was certainly not a sensible place to stand around.”
Mr. Morel continues, “There was an almighty bang and a great big flash of light. Immediately my wife and I realized there had been a crash. My first thought was that those inside the tunnel were connected with what had happened. This thought has never left me!”
Like several other witnesses who also feared for their lives, Mr. Morel only broke his silence after several years had elapsed since the accident. Evidently his testimony was taken seriously enough to warrant being flown to London for a 3-day interview by the Diana Crash Investigatory (Inquiry) Team headed by former Scotland Yard chief, Lord Stevens.
October 4, 2014 @ 12:20 am
The end crashed car result was total bollox…bit like the Tavistock Square bus……both decapitated…FFS give me a break.
October 4, 2014 @ 10:22 am
How did they know the vehicles micro chip was stolen and when did they discover it had been replaced ?
October 3, 2014 @ 3:29 pm
We have given number of books to read on the subject, some videos too if reading isn’t your thing. If you expect someone to sit you down with a piece of paper and pen and explain it step by step your going to be waiting along time. As for arranging a car crash, well its not the first time government have organised the death of a thorn in there side, or do yu want examples of that too.
October 3, 2014 @ 4:00 pm
I would think that most people who regularly visit this site have done a lot of their own research on this subject already. ( maybe even more than you! ) It’s a bit insulting to imagine that these same people are incapable of coming to a plausible conclusion off their own backs given credible information. You don’t appear to have much respect for the intelligence of the readership Mr Gallows.
October 3, 2014 @ 4:40 pm
Chris Roberts asked if there was anybody who could explain how this accident could be arranged, i pointed him in the direction of the other posts that had the some books and video referencing he could use.
Personally i don’t have much time to explain the whole story to him, nether would i want to considering his condescending tone in his post, did you read his post?
I’m not here to spoon feed him or anyone the information, its for him to find out and make his own mind up.
Now my question is what has made you jump up on your high horse and act as defender of the ‘can’t be bothered to research’ folk?
October 3, 2014 @ 8:48 pm
PMT .No more to be said.
October 3, 2014 @ 5:26 pm
Chris I have six golden eggs for a straight swop for a cow/goat/or guinea pig, interested?
October 3, 2014 @ 5:26 pm
No magic beans?
October 2, 2014 @ 8:48 am
Morning Chris.
Seems that this is fabricated bullshit,
October 2, 2014 @ 10:39 am
Yep , “Hello I’m Rani and welcome to my blog!” , misspelt as it should read , ” Hello I’m a Trani and welcome to my bog!” , talk about shit to dam funny , POA , Legal Advisor to Tittsworth & Grabbe and Goodnight.
October 2, 2014 @ 9:06 am
Not falling for that load of rubbish.
1/10 Must try harder and be more imaginative.
October 2, 2014 @ 9:53 am
Take a look-see at: http ://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2777145/Police-probe-trolls-sending-hate-messages-McCanns-Detectives-investigate-given-dossier-catalogues-remarks-including-death-threats.html
October 2, 2014 @ 10:03 am
Well if it takes them as long to investigate that as it did to recover the text and phone calls from Larry,Curly and Moe in Portugal don’t expect any development for at least 7yrs , POA , Legal Advisor to Tittsworth & Grabbe and Goodnight.
October 3, 2014 @ 10:39 am
I saw it on sky news, I only put it on to get the time, that’s the only truthful thing on there. The first thing I thought was aw fk they will soon be visiting Spivey and telling him he is not allowed to have his own opinion. Just like it looks to me, they want us all to believe only government approved (truth). I am naturally a very very sceptical guy, but the cnts have even me worried now. They are like a anaconda, every time we breathe out they tighten their grip.
October 2, 2014 @ 9:56 am
Hi Chris & all.
Well done Rani for this story that has been written by someone obviously using fifty shades of grey as a template “he took out his big memory stick & put it deep inside my usb port”. One question to you, just how the hell did you get all of that information from one brief recorded phone conversation? Was this recorded phone call a confessional to her priest where she included her whole life story? I look forward to the email from someone called Iran saying he witnessed all the events unfold at Woolwich & they happened exactly as seen in the media lol.
October 2, 2014 @ 10:06 am
Oh that’s cleared up then,
‘move along nothing to see here’.
October 2, 2014 @ 10:12 am
Sounds a little too good to be true, and at a very convenient time. Just like you said.
October 2, 2014 @ 10:13 am
Anyone want to trade a cow for 6 golden eggs?
October 2, 2014 @ 10:16 am
rani, on your next visit to your psychiatrist ask him/her to explain to you about “delusions of grandeur”……………………………………….
October 2, 2014 @ 10:24 am
Why the need to be so specific that he had a MacBook Pro laptop.
They were released for the first time in 2006, so were unavailable in 1997
File under bollocks
October 2, 2014 @ 12:58 pm
Roger, she alleged she heard the recording via his MacBook Pro in 2012.
I read the story with an open mind, and a lot of it does sound feasible. Why though, if she had waited nearly two years to get the story out, couldn’t she wait until she had got back from the library to charge up her laptop? It may have been quicker than doing all that on a phone. Not a major point, but one she saw fit to mention. And why would her super intelligent ex- (Intel) boyfriend offer to give her a copy of the audio unless he wanted her to take it to the press – a move which would probably cost him or somebody close to him, their life? I can understand a man trying to impress a woman with a bit of pillow talk, even if it is only to say I am a secret agent and can’t say anything, but this is virtual suicide.
This coincides, Chris, with all of your info being scrutinised from your stolen PCs. But even if the story were to be true, we all know by now what lengths the Establishment will go to in order to protect the Establishment. We can pick over this and other things like 9/11 until the cows come home, things that happened nearly 20 years ago, and meanwhile ‘they’ are planning and implementing further atrocities while we are looking over our shoulders.
October 2, 2014 @ 10:28 am
“Further more Adam told me regarding the SAS claims that they killed Princess Diana is upsurd and total fabrication because Mi5 and Mi6 para-military wing is called Triple S, which stands for Secret Security Squad and they are recruited from the SAS, SBS SFSG etc.. and they have to sign the Official Secrets Act and be trained in the world of espionage.” , lmfao well as soon as you sign on the dotted line you have signed the Official Secrets Act , to dam funny , next , POA , Legal Advisor to Tittsworth & Grabbe and Goodnight.
PS:- Wtf is upsurd anyway ?
October 2, 2014 @ 10:35 am
Yes this could well be a pile of shit but was there really anything revealing in what she said? We all know Diana was heartbroken by Charles and Camilla. We all know Hasnat became the real love of her life and we all know Al-Fayed exaggerated the seriousness of her and Dodi’s relationship. I feel myself that Rani is probably genuine but was herself taken in by ‘Adam’s’ explanation of events rather than what she actually heard herself on the recording.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:09 am
” We all know…” ???? Really? We know damned all about this lot believe me.
October 2, 2014 @ 10:44 am
Some interesting snippets in that semi-fiction written by someone pretending to be less literate than they really are!
Maybe as a little joke rani = iran, and I like the ‘Secret Security Squad’ thing, reminds me that ‘SAS’ really stands for ‘Super Army Soldiers’
http:// ww w.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf0e3sT_Jeg
October 2, 2014 @ 12:30 pm
“Rani´s” story could almost have been penned by Diana´s own late step-grandmother, that old fanny, Barbara Cartland! The blog page inself looks pretty fake as well?
October 2, 2014 @ 11:05 am
A load of old rubbish. Interesting that the grammar and spelling is inconsistent ………………always a sign that something is not quite as it should be. I lost the will to live three quarters of the way through and have to confess gave the rest a miss. She, the writer, says, …………”that a journalist had called her from a national newspaper in England, I can’t remember his name or what newspaper he was with, I think if you pressed me on it, I would say it was News of the World or the Daily Mail. ”
Now several things bother me about this.
The writer can’t remember the name of the journalist but remembered enough to know it was a man and not a woman. Convenient.
The writer can’t remember which paper he was with. The DM or NOW. Why not the Times or the Sun? Convenient.
It’s so obvious that the WRITER is trying to create an atmosphere of memory recall here for her readers. Happily for us she was just right enough on both accounts to get us to the desired mark. Oh that would be Richard Key then, from the good old Daily Mail. Duh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And then again her memory recall is exceptional when she mentions prices of jewellery and little historical sets .And Adam ?…………………..” Adam then asked me if I wanted a copy of the audio. I refused right away because A) I was scared to have the last recording of Princess Diana talking privately on the phone to one of her family members in my flat and B) I didn’t think I had the right to keep it.”……………… All I can say is if Adam is the best we can do in our intelligence services , it does actually explain quite a lot.
I think, no, I don’t think, I know you’re right Chris. You’re being played and it’s pretty insulting in my opinion that ”THEY” think that we are so stupid we would believe every scripted word of it.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:19 am
Disinformation of the most upsurd kind.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:27 am
Her account does not come across as credible.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:48 am
Na! Too much Linda Le Plant.
October 2, 2014 @ 12:19 pm
As if Diana bothered to speak to journalists on the phone. I doubt she even answered the phone for herself. And as for her being a humanitiarian committed to ending land mines, what a crock of shit. She only did stuff like that to make herself look good.
Where do people get the idea that spooks all live in London. As I said yesterday MI5 are currently recruiting intelligence and data analysts but they are based around the country. And why spend a fucking fortune on GCHQ in Cheltenham then send all the spooks to London, lol.
She is trying to protect Adam by telling the world where he went to uni, what grade he got, and describing his house in so much detail that she might have well as given us his full name, date of birth and national insurance number. He’s not much of a spook is he if he’s giving his girlfriend such info.
If these recordings existed they would have been released to prove the royals had nothing to do with her death.
I think ‘Rani’ was created by ‘Adam’. A muslim woman choosing a biblical name for her boyfriends alias, wouldn’t she have called him mohammed? Not a very good muslim is she? She wants to watch out for those Jihadi Jackies they will chop her head off for not being muslim enough.
October 4, 2014 @ 4:21 pm
This character certainly appeared out of nowhere. There is also a twatter-account with the first tweet appearing a couple of weeks ago. https ://twitter.com/RaniAhmedson
October 2, 2014 @ 12:26 pm
This story is upsurd……………..funny but upsurd. 😉
October 2, 2014 @ 12:27 pm
Adam rolled up the sleeves of his Armani suit jacket, & looked at his Rolex watch, he pulled out his iphone 6 but he had no signal (he must get the new signal boost & machine gun version from M back at HQ). We had no time left, we had to leave quickly so we copied the files by using a Nikon camera & then put them on his Macbook Pro we then sped off together in his Austin Martin. Another work of fiction with product placement. Royalties please!
October 2, 2014 @ 1:37 pm
Macbook Pro? What is he a fucking architect as well, i can’t think that any security service would use apple products for storing sensitive information on, they have more back doors than a MPs knocking shop.
Can the author of this thrilling story come forward please, its not that we don’t believe you its well, we don’t believe you.
October 2, 2014 @ 1:00 pm
Rani’s story conveniently ties in nicely with the terrible propaganda film Diana the movie released in 2013. You know that this story will be picked up by the MSM & together they will again replace the truth with an altered establishment friendly version of events & through media saturation & time this will be the official historical version for future generations.
October 2, 2014 @ 1:07 pm
……..After dining out, Adam and I went back to Adam’s glamourous flat in Victoria, London, where I now presume was a safe house where other agents lived with a high security alarm system which was fitted in all the flats inside the beautiful white crisp stucco-fronted apartments block with vibrant flowers adorned on all the windowsills and tall grey square pots containing colourful plants…….
Sounds like fan fiction to someone I forwarded this to and I tend to agree. I don’t think there was anything new in what was written. I do however wonder as to why it was written and to which section of the public it was aimed. Multiple authors or an aspiring Mills and Boon contributor perhaps. I am not getting a genuine vibe. Sorry.
Stay safe.
October 2, 2014 @ 1:32 pm
Yeah, this is how an author would write, setting a scene, not a normal person in conversation, especially when this is a big story and your mind would be on the basic facts, not the décor or brands.
October 2, 2014 @ 1:54 pm
“how an author would write, setting a scene,”
Yes, that was the bit that didn’t ring true for me, it was far too descriptive. Maybe Rani’s real name is Maeve Binchy or suchlike. Seriously though,
the whole story seems to fit into the “blame the muslims” theme of the moment. However, my “paranoid tendencies” did ask, why was I booted off the internet twice while trying to load it? Hmmm! But I remain unconvinced, and what kind of person sells their story to MSM anyway and then looks for support from alternate media when her life is in danger?
October 2, 2014 @ 1:10 pm
Sorry don’t believe this crap-There was an attempt on Diana’s life in 1996 when she was travelling in her BMW through Kensington when a Fiat Uno crashed into the driver’s side of the BMW and eye witness’s said ‘Diana’s car was badly damaged on the driver’s side’-though Diana was unhurt she was very badly shaken up .Diana and Jill Dando were close friends with each other who were also close friends with Cliff Richard. Though Jimmy Sa-vile who was a close pal of Charlie boy Diana detested him. I think there’s more of a connection between the murders of Jill Dando and Diana-as both of them had connections with possibly people confiding in them and informing them of paedophile rings within the BBC and the establishment.I may be wrong only i believe Diana and Jill were both murdered for the same reason-TO SHUT THEM UP…….xx
October 2, 2014 @ 2:09 pm
I agree with you, Jill was killed over VIP child abuse, she was going to spill the beans and screw the entire establishment. Diana though id put money on being a sacrifice of some sort, its important to remember that Diana was of exactly the same background aristocratic as the rest of the royal family, she had the same slightly inbred view of the world, one that put people of her ‘class’ above the rest.
All the shit about peoples princess was just for media dribble to keep the masses in love and on there knees, she didn’t care about normal people and i doubt she cared about abused children. She was fucking everything she could whilst she could remember (will carling, james ‘not harrys dad’s’ hewitt, dodi, Hasnat Khan)
In my opinion she was no different than the rest of the royal parasites.
October 2, 2014 @ 3:50 pm
Hi Gallows-I know Diana was used by the Establishment to keep the masses occupied-but to say she didn’t ‘care’ about others i think is a tad unfair.I used to work near London therefore met a lot of people who knew her.They all said one thing in common-of how caring she was to others.One of her Chauffeurs regularly on her request used to take her to a back entrance of a Hospital where she’d sit with dying patients.This was usually after a prestigios event (where her and Charlie boy would go their seperate ways-and nowhere in view of the msm either ).Yes she may have been mind-controlled-(I believe i was when i was in a Nursey for 5 years as memory very vague ) though with the Love from my adoptive parents it obviously helped me to be a caring individual.Diana was more in touch with people than the rest of the parasites and i do believe she was a threat to the coffin dodger and the puke of edinburgh.Apparently a victim at Elm Guest House said he owed his life to Diana where she helped him throgh a terrible time.She also openly hugged children dying from aids ( much to the disgust of the Royal Parasites) -though through fear of ‘catching’ aids people would normally run a mile as advertised by the msm.Sometimes there are exceptions-and i do believe Diana detested the Establishment though when she was young and naive she’d fallen into the trap-With all the riches she had she wasn’t happy-though judging by her body language she loved her boys-though as we know that’s another story.Her family used and manipulated her as well-At first i used to think Diana was mixed up-but then again i used to be-though i’ve always given her the benefit of the doubt-i don’t think the people who i met would say what a caring person she was especially when some of them weren’t supporters of the Royal Parasites themselves…….TC Louise xx
October 2, 2014 @ 4:15 pm
Hi Louise, im not as well informed as you so it would be stupid to argue with you! If in fact she was as sympathetic to the people as has been made out then that would pose a threat to the parasites status quo and could be another reason for her murder. I will just say this, if someone as informed as Diana had the scruples to see the world for what it was i believe she could have done more to release herself from the situation, or maybe she was and that was why she was killed.
Thanks for the insight anyway, xxx
October 2, 2014 @ 5:06 pm
Hi Louise. I agree with you. I know for a fact that Diana gave a huge amount of help to victims of sexual abuse; in fact one young Man who credits Diana for saving his life was a victim of Elm House. I also know for a fact that Diana was gonna blow the whistle on the whole stinkin lot of the child raping royals and our govt. She had her faults for sure (like we all do), , but I believe she was a decent and kind young Woman trapped amongs a nest of vipers. tc mate, lorraine xx
October 2, 2014 @ 6:18 pm
Raine, how do you know Diana was going to blow the whistle on them?
October 2, 2014 @ 9:06 pm
LOUISE:
”…………. I also know for a fact that Diana was gonna blow the whistle on the whole stinkin lot of the child raping royals and our govt. ”……………..
You KNOW for a fact?
Please elaborate.
October 5, 2014 @ 3:10 pm
Calla, why should she elaborate. If you want elaboration go and do the research.
October 2, 2014 @ 10:34 pm
Hi Calla-I’ve researched Diana’s death for a long time-It was common knowledge with the people who i used to work with Diana would listen to other people’s problems. Yes i do believe she knew a lot of facts which TPTB were frightened she was going to reveal which they obviously didn’t want made public.I don’t know if you remember Diana wrote a letter specifically stating a member of the Establishment was planning her demise in a suspected car crash-though obviously they weren’t took seriously as Diana had’ Mental’ problems. Her x butler Paul Burell was took to court on suspicion of theft and warned to keep his mouth shut by TPTB.Time and time again everytime you research TPTB you come across so many links of the deceit they weave.It was an open secret Diana detested Sa-vile (as we know had more links than any chain) and she had a circle of friends one of them Jill Dando.I agree there’s still a lot that needs to be researched as i can’t elaborate what i don’t know-but i do think it’s obvious they were both murdered to shut them up…….TC Louise xx.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:06 pm
Louise, with respect believing something is not the same as “knowing for a fact”.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:11 pm
Gallows, how do you know Dando was going to spill the beans as well. I’m seeing all these claims, but no actual evidence to support them.
October 3, 2014 @ 8:27 am
Hi Gutsful-I can very much see your doubt on these claims on the murders of Jill Dando and Diana.What we must realise though is TPTB cover up anything and everything so the truth isn’t revealed about their deceitfullness.As we know most murders are usually now proved with DNA evidence usually backed up by witness accounts.I’m no DI or private investigator to back up any concrete evidence on these two murders though through research i do believe there’s been enough evidence backed up by witnesses who have come forward and made these claims especially in the wake of Sa-vile’s death that Diana was going to spill the beans on TPTB. I know it pays to be cautious without full evidence and it’s no good to ‘jump’ on the band wagon.Diana was a ‘thorn’ in the side of the Establishment-though she did play the sympathy card to weigh public opinion in her favour. As Dando and Diana( who btw looked uncannily similar) were friends they probably confided in one another-as friends do anyway). With more and more witnesses coming forward all the time it looks as though there is more evidence being divulged by the day.Over the years where more Whistleblowers are coming forward by the day then obviously more is going to be revealed.I try not to make assumptions i just look at the facts by which it looks very probable they were both murdered for the same reason.Over the years since the internet was founded where more and more people are waking up-how and why has this become possible?-By witnesses putting their lives at risk and revealing the truth that’s why-how do you think we’ve got this far?……You take care Louise xx
October 3, 2014 @ 10:20 am
Hi Louise, as you can see my name is Gutsful, shortened from I’ve had a gutsful, because I really have had it with this system we are all existing under, and the morons that rule over us. I cant say anything about that tosser IDS, because I know I would get a visit from the local plod. As for Diana, my instinct and intuition plus everything I have read tells me she was murdered. With Dando I do think she was assassinated for (to me) reasons unknown. I also believe Barry George was fitted up. This one was done by pro’s imho. On Saville that guy Tim Bell? Was it? In the Mail talking about Thatcher Tec. He actually claimed that Saville never stayed at Chechers? As everyone on the AM seems to claim. He could be lying of course.
October 4, 2014 @ 11:45 am
Hi Gutsful, I’ve been wondering about this for a while. This theory seems to have popped up out of nowhere on the sites we all (I assume) follow, without anything to even slightly substantiate it.
October 4, 2014 @ 12:30 pm
Which theory in particular?
October 4, 2014 @ 4:16 pm
THECRUISER
I think you mean savile’s friendship with Thatcher can’t be substantiated? Well, the thing is, he was given a knighthood when the royal family MUST have known that he was a child rapist. MI5 vet EVERYONE before they are allowed near the royals. This tells us that queenie and the rest of her vile and in-bred family are down with noncing. His 30 + years friendship with Prince Charles is VERY well documented. You might wonder why our future king would want to associate with a baby-raper………………
The point I am making is that the xmas holidays that he ‘allegedly’ spent with the evil witch Thatcher pales in to insignificance when you consider that the most powerful family in the land (and maybe the world?) are close to people like savile and ‘reward’ them with knighthoods. tc, lorraine, x
October 4, 2014 @ 4:25 pm
The former Radio 1 DJ, best known still for the TV programme Jim’ll Fix It, has bizarrely claimed in an interview this week that alongside his career as an entertainer, he has secretly served as an adviser to world leaders and royalty alike.
“I guess I am like Forrest Gump,” he told Esquire magazine.
“I am like a sewing machine needle that goes in here and goes in there, but I am also the eminence grise: the grey, shadowy figure in the background. The thing about me is I get things done and I work under cover.”
Among the revelations, he describes meeting the president of Israel who invited him to address the country’s cabinet in 1975.
He says that he was asked by Prince Charles to keep Sarah Ferguson, then married to Prince Andrew, out of trouble.
He also spent “11 consecutive Christmases at Chequers” with the Thatchers – or so he says.
Now one wonders whether Savile, at 81, is perhaps a being a little more Walter Mitty than Forrest Gump.
Can these eye-popping claims actually be substantiated?
We can all agree that he is utterly eccentric and unique (he sleeps in his tracksuits and still dry-cleans his mother’s clothes, even though she died in 1973).
But is this man – a former wrestler, who has never married – also a man who has had his hand on the levers of power?
Take, for example, the friendships he says he has had with successive Prime Ministers.
He explains that his connections with Stoke Mandeville Hospital – a few miles from Chequers – have allowed him to form these relationships, and that his friendship with Margaret Thatcher was particularly cordial.
Read more: http://ww w.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-565179/Jim-fixer-Is-Jimmy-Savile-just-fantasist—truth-stranger-fiction.html#ixzz3FBqo3u1B
October 4, 2014 @ 4:48 pm
Mrs McGee told the Daily Mail: ‘I was shown to my seat next to Savile… Suddenly I felt his hand go down my neck and I thought, “I can’t believe that just happened”.
‘It was so inappropriate. I couldn’t believe someone could be so confident to do that knowing they could get a glass of wine thrown in their face while they were a guest at Chequers.
‘He knew I was married and my husband was at the table. But I was too polite and the etiquette of the occasion meant that I put up with it.
Read more: http://ww w.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2487217/Jimmy-Savile-harassed-music-boss-wife-Chequers-dinner-party-hosted-Tony-Blair.html#ixzz3FBwgADRN
From Paul Gambaccini in an interview:
“Who vetted the knighthood? Coco the clown?”
He said the entire society was taken in by Savile – “including the Prime Minister who invited him to Chequers; including the royal family, photographed with him, he got a knighthood in this country, he got a papal knighthood. “This is not just the BBC this is history, this is a man who conned an entire society,” Gambaccini added.
Source is London Evening Standard
😉
October 4, 2014 @ 8:08 pm
Dogman, I was referring to gutsful’s comment:
‘Gallows, how do you know Dando was going to spill the beans as well. I’m seeing all these claims, but no actual evidence to support them’, but thanks for the Savile stuff anyway…
October 4, 2014 @ 8:16 pm
No problem THECRUISER, somebody mentioned Chequers, gutsful I believe, and John doubted what Dando knew. Whether she was gonna spill the beans or not, she certainly appears to have known what went on and while nobody knows what she was thinking, given her role in Crimewatch, and people she associated with through that, it would seem logical that somebody might do some tidying up. Better before than after she talked. It only takes a whisper in the wrong ear to upset some of these people. That I do know!
October 4, 2014 @ 8:27 pm
That was my point Dogman, where is the evidence that ‘she certainly appears to have known what went on’ because I can’t seem to find any?
October 4, 2014 @ 8:31 pm
Read my earlier links then fella
October 4, 2014 @ 8:36 pm
Seen the links fella, but they’re hearsay. I can’t find anywhere that she actually spoke or wrote about any of this stuff. It’s difficult for me to logically assume something is correct based upon hearsay only. Perhaps it’s like you say, it’s like religion, believe it or move on…
October 4, 2014 @ 8:55 pm
Her friends and colleagues must all be liars then. Time to move on as you say!
October 4, 2014 @ 9:37 pm
Or glory seekers? Hearsay’s not a very reliable religion from my experience.
October 4, 2014 @ 10:59 am
There is no evidence whatsoever with the oft repeated claim that Jill Dando had uncovered a Paedophile ring and was investigating it. Not a single credible source has been put forward online or anywhere else to substatiate this. What we do have is plenty of people repeating this claim without offerering a shred of evidence. It’s a clear case of ‘if you say it often enough it must be true’. Wake up to the nonsense.
October 4, 2014 @ 11:02 am
Right ok John, thanks.
Can we all stop discussing the Jill Dando Paedophile link please, John says its not true.
October 4, 2014 @ 11:31 am
Well it got said often enough in the MSM, let alone the AM
http://ww w.express.co.uk/news/uk/490169/Dando-alarm-paedophile-ring-BBC
http://ww w.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/389922/Tragic-Jill-Dando-probed-BBC-PAEDO-ring
http://ww w.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2698820/Murdered-Crimewatch-presenter-Jill-Dando-tried-bosses-investigate-alleged-paeodphile-ring-inside-BBC-no-one-wanted-know.html
http://ww w.plymouthherald.co.uk/Plymouth-journalist-Jill-Dando-knew-BBC/story-21663985-detail/story.html
ht tps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jill_Dando
October 4, 2014 @ 11:47 am
John im binning your comments, your full of shit and being argumentative for the sake of it.
October 4, 2014 @ 1:05 pm
HAH, well no-one can argue with that DM. I would think.
October 4, 2014 @ 4:26 pm
John
Hi John. You seem to be missing the point entirely (it seems to be a nasty virus that some people are catching). The question you SHOULD be asking is NOT whether or not Dando was about to expose savile and the rest of the filth, but WHY were these baby-rapers never arrested in the first place? People such as savile who was VERY close to the royals and never served one day in prison. Isn’t THAT what should be concerning you or am I wrong? tc, lorraine, x
October 4, 2014 @ 4:44 pm
Raine
Allegedly John is just being argumentative (Source is Gallows)
I have no proof, but I believe he is just being a cock…
Take care xx
October 2, 2014 @ 2:21 pm
PS, i meant to add louise, your comments are getting spammed again, (changed IP?) if you post and nothing comes up give us a nudge and we will retrieve from there. Hope you are well.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:17 pm
Louise, why couldn’t it have been a normal RTA? Who claimed it was a assassination attempt?
October 3, 2014 @ 11:39 am
Gutsful…..’why couldn’t it have been a normal RTA?’
Gutsful, with respect, as Louise as pointed out, many witnesses have come forward over the years and have cast considerable doubt on the theory that Diana was killed in an ‘accident.’ I am sure you are well aware Gutsful of ‘circumstantial evidence.’ And the circumstantial evidence that points to the very high probability that Diana was murdered by the establishment is no mere fanciful illusion. This being so, is it not a reasonable assumption that the car accident that Diana was involved in a year before her death was indeed an attempt on her life? I mean when you consider what happened to her a year later……….
Gutsful, ask yourself a question: Do you HONESTLY believe that Diana’s death was an accident? tc, lorraine x
October 3, 2014 @ 11:55 am
Princess Diana also survived the crash. She sustained serious injuries and was bleeding internally, but the first doctor on the scene of the crash believed that she would survive, with proper emergency medical care. Dr. Frederic Mailliez was driving through the Place de L’Alma and happened on the site, just minutes after the crash. According to a lengthy news account, published in The Scotsman on Sept. 29, Dr. Mailliez did not believe that Princess Diana’s condition was desperate. He later told a French medical journal, “I thought her life could be saved.” Dr. Mailliez was an experienced emergency medical professional, who worked at one time for the SAMU, the French government’s emergency ambulance service, before going to work for a private medical response outfit called SOS Medecins.
Dr. Mailliez found Princess Diana lying on the back seat of the Mercedes, according to his account to The Scotsman. Contrary to stories leaked by French authorities to the press, she was not pinned in the rear compartment. The back seat of the Mercedes had not been seriously damaged in the crash, and there was no obstruction to getting at Diana. The French authorities issued these initial false reports in response to queries why it had taken an incredible one hour and 43 minutes, from the time that the first ambulance arrived at the crash site, to deliver Princess Diana to the hospital-four miles away.
Further, Romuald Rat, one of the most thuggish of the paparazzi, who was later charged with possible complicity in the Mercedes crash, was observed by one eyewitness at the crash site, leaning over Princess Diana as she lay semi-conscious in the back seat of the Mercedes, just before the first emergency rescue crew arrived.
Dr. Mailliez moved Diana’s head to allow her to breathe. He called the emergency hotline to report the details of the crash on his car phone. He was told that ambulances had already been dispatched to the scene. He then administered oxygen, and ensured that Diana was not going to choke to death~h or swallow her tongue. When SAMU arrived on the scene, Dr. Mailliez left, confident that she would be quickly brought to a nearby hospital. He had ah~already concluded, on the basis of Princess Diana’s vital signs, and her movements, that she was bleeding internally.
The first doctors to arrive with the ambulance and the other emergency vehicles reached the same conclusion, according to statements given to The Scotsman. One doctor who asked to remain anonymous said: “She was sweating and her blood pressure had dropped. She had the external signs of internal hemorrhage.”
Diana was lying across the back seat of the Mercedes, with most of her body leaning outside the car, when the ambulance arrived, approximately 15-16 minutes after the crash, according to one of the ambulance crew, who also spoke to The Scotsman. She was almost immediately removed from the car. Yet, Diana remained at the crash site for another hour, before she was placed in an ambulance and driven, at less than 25 mph, to a hospital on the other side of the Seine River, four miles away. The decision to bring Princess Diana to La Pitie Salpetriere Hospital was evidently made by the senior French government officials on the spot, Paris Police Chief Massoni and Interior Minister Chevenement. Massoni was in the tunnel, and Chevenement was already at La Pitie Salpetriere, in phone contact with the rescue crew in the tunnel. Yet, there are five other hospitals closer to the crash site, all with advanced emergency capabilities.
One highly respected French doctor who specializes in emergency response, told EIR, in an exclusive interview, that Princess Diana should have been taken to the Val de Grace, “which is much closer than La Pitie. That is a military hospital. Every political figure who is in a car crash or is injured is taken there.” The doctor added: “The firemen, who were on the scene of the crash, are part of the Army. They undoubtedly notified the Val de Grace, which has a top team of trauma specialists on duty ’round the clock. I might have helicoptered her in. She would have been on the operating block a few minutes after being stabilized. This woman was one of the world’s most powerful and influential people. She would normally have been given top priority and top treatment. She was not.”
Not only was Princess Diana not brought to Val de Grace. She was not brought to Cochin Hospital, the Hotel Dieu, Lariboisiere, or the private American Hospital – all of which were closer than La Pitie Salpetriere, and all of which had qualified personnel and emergency facilities to repair the damaged arteries.
There is no credible explanation for why the French emergency personnel at the scene waited for more than an hour to place Princess Diana into the ambulance. There is no credible explanation for why the four-mile ride, through barren Paris streets, took 43 minutes! There is certainly no credible explanation for why the ambulance stopped for ten minutes outside the French Natural History Museum, just a few hundred yards from Le Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, as confirmed to both The Scotsman and the British weekly The People!
In a case where a crash victim has been diagnosed as suffering from internal bleeding, there is only one proper course of action. The victim should be stabilized, and then be rushed to a hospital for surgery. Unless the internal bleeding is stopped, the patient bleeds to death. This is precisely what happened to Princess Diana.
ht tp://public-interest.co.uk/diana/diexposed.htm
October 3, 2014 @ 2:25 pm
Hi Dogman… It may or may not be true, but I have heard of a second-hand story from a friend of a friend (who incidentally is not into ‘conspiracy theories’ yet absolutely swears it to be the truth) that she was in Paris on the night of the crash and got back to her hotel room after a late night out and switched on the TV in the room. The local 24-hour news channel was airing the first pictures to come-in of an appalling car accident in Paris and she was just in time to see images of a young blonde woman, obviously dazed and groggy, but who was nevertheless able to enter the ambulance on foot, albeit with assistance from paramedics on either side of her. She recognised this woman as Princess Diana and went to bed thinking that Diana had ‘had a lucky escape’. She was obviously shocked and mystified next day when she awoke to all the reports of the princess’s death in the car crash. Of course those images were never shown or referred-to ever again as is usual in these cases. As a footnote to this, I have recently seen first-hand, confirmation that on that fateful night, the BBC newscaster Martyn Lewis in the BBC’s first ‘newsflash’ at the time announced that Dodi had been killed outright, but that Diana had been seen ‘walking into an ambulance’. John.
October 3, 2014 @ 2:56 pm
Thanks John. After seeing the crash photos, I can easily believe that she may have walked into the ambulance. ht tp://car-accidents.com/princess-diana-car-accident.html
October 3, 2014 @ 3:29 pm
Entitled Diana Inquest: How & Why Did Diana Die? this 740 page work by investigative writer John Morgan, analyses in detail the witness, documentary and other evidence heard during the 2008 London inquest into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed.
The inquest heard evidence from witnesses at the scene who stated one after another that Diana survived the crash and was alive, conscious and talking in the back of the Mercedes. 3½ hours later she was pronounced dead.
The book, which is the second volume of a series called Diana Inquest: The Untold Story reveals to the public for the first time the minute by minute post-crash events that were occurring both inside and outside Diana’s ambulance in the early hours of 31 August 1997. It establishes the surprising truth of precisely what led to Diana finally arriving virtually dead at La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital at 2.06 a.m. – 1 hour and 43 minutes after the 12.23 a.m. road crash in the Alma Tunnel. An independent time line assessment included in the book shows that Princess Diana could and should have arrived at the hospital at approximately 1.04 a.m. – 1 hour and two minutes earlier than what happened on the night.
The inquest evidence revealed that it was only 6 minutes after Diana’s hospital arrival, at around 2.12 a.m., that her heart stopped beating. Although Diana wasn’t officially pronounced dead until 4.00 a.m., she effectively had already died 1¾ hours earlier.
This timing – completely based on what was heard by the jury and assembled media at the inquest – places a renewed spotlight on the long delay that occurred while the ambulance remained stationary in the Alma Tunnel, the transcripts of conversations between the ambulance and the base, the communication blackout during the 25 minute journey to the hospital and the 5 minute stoppage very close to the hospital gates.
October 3, 2014 @ 3:32 pm
Princess Diana could have survived her Paris car crash, a top British surgeon told the inquest into her death yesterday (19.11.07).
Doctor Thomas Treasure said there may have been a “window of opportunity” if French medics hadn’t wasted vital time and reached the Paris hospital half
an hour earlier on 31 August, 1997.
Dr. Treasure, who was asked to review records of the treatment given to Diana for coroner Lord Justice Scott Baker, said medics did a lot of “substantial good” in the initial period after the accident but that once
Diana was in the ambulance time began “slipping away”.
While he admitted the princess’ injuries were very serious, he made clear there was a small chance she could have lived.
He said there was a difference between the French approach to victims of multiple injuries, which favours treatment by doctors at the scene, and the British approach of transporting patients to a hospital as quickly as possible.
Of Diana’s treatment Dr. Treasure said: “That’s my analysis. They (the medics) had done a lot of good in that first half hour, but from there the next big amount of good that could be done required a surgeon.”
Nicholas Hilliard, a lawyer at the inquest, asked: “Is it your view that part of that time, the essential period, was squandered?”
The surgeon replied: “It’s a hard word, isn’t it? But I think opportunities were lost. When I pick through this with the benefit of hindsight (and ask) ‘Was this recoverable?’ the answer is ‘Yes, it just about was.'”
The jury also heard the testimony of French Dr. Andre Lienhart, who told how Diana was so agitated when medics first treated her she tore out an intravenous drip medics inserted into her arm.
source is londonnet.co.uk
October 3, 2014 @ 3:35 pm
Diana claimed in a letter there was a plot to kill her in a car “accident”, according to published extracts which reignited the widely held belief that she was murdered by her own government. “This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous”. The princess then identified where she felt the threat and danger would come from: “Prince Charles is planning ‘an accident’ in my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry”.
Diana wrote this to Burrell, 10 months before she was killed in a car crash in a Paris underpass on August 31, 1997. Burrell said he had released the letter in the hope that it would lead to an inquest and a “thorough investigation of the facts by the British authorities”.
Burrell, once described by Diana as her “rock”, later sold his story to the Daily Mirror, in which he claimed the queen warned him that his close relationship with the princess could put him in danger. “There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge,” the queen is claimed to have told the former butler. Diana’s letter reflects her understanding of the diabolical nature of the Royal Family, the House of Windsor, and British intelligence.
Before sealing the letter in an envelope marked “Paul’, the princess told Burrell: “I’m going to date this and I want you to keep it. Just in case.” Burrell writes in his book — “But, with the benefit of hindsight, the content of that letter has bothered me since her death.” Burrell said Diana believed she was regarded as a nuisance once she and Prince Charles were divorced in 1996. The cover story for Diana’s murder was cast in stone with a French inquiry in 1999 that concluded the car crashed because the driver had been drinking and traveling too fast.
ht tp://nstarzone.com/DIANA.htm
October 3, 2014 @ 5:07 pm
I read also that her Spiritual friend – Christine Fitzgerald reported that Diana had a body scar from the pubis to the throat…..more here.
www .resistance2010.com/profiles/blogs/what-princess-diana-knew
October 3, 2014 @ 8:13 pm
To reply to John’s comment…I watched the news as it was breaking on Diana’s *cough* accident and there are two things that I can absolutely attest to….I watched a woman falteringly and obviously dazed get out of that Mercedes and walk albeit slowly and the News Caster on News 24 also stated that, according to eye witnesses, a woman was seen to get out of the crashed vehicle and walk…I now assume to the ambulance…this was around 2.30 to 3am GMT
October 5, 2014 @ 7:10 pm
No raine, I was referring to that first crash. I will have to Google that one because I can’t recall the details. I also said somewhere else here, that I noticed that a fiat uno was said to be involved in both incidents. Could be something or nothing I suppose.
October 3, 2014 @ 8:28 pm
I agree that there is a link with Diana and Jiill Dando, JIll Dando was almost certainly killed for her knowledge and possibly she was about to make her knowledge public, she also worked with self professed peado Nick Ross! also think it’s highly odd and coincidental that her partner at the time has gone on to deliver the royal baby!
I’ve never liked the royals but Diana did come across slightly more human than the others, I was a naive teen when she was killed and but I still thought it was not an accident, back then I always thought it was because she had shamed the royals by divorcing the jug eared inbred, but now and especially since the saville thing it wouldn’t surprise me at all if it was to shut her up about the peados.
October 5, 2014 @ 1:17 pm
Hi louise, I picked up on there being a fiat uno being involved in both incidents. Could be coincidence I suppose.
October 2, 2014 @ 1:37 pm
I read the Paget Report in full. In one chapter It describes in full detail all the alcoholic drink found in the flat of Henri Paul (the driver of the Mercedes) who they were trying claim was drunk. Only in the notes in the appendix did it reveal that the flat was searched twice previously with no alcoholic drink being found.
When the jury gave there verdict “unlawful killing by unidentified following vehicles” the BBC followed by all media deliberately miss quoted the verdict replacing following vehicles with the word paparazzi. All the headline had jury blames paparazzi. Even though the trial had established that the vehicles being driven by the paparazzi did not match those that caused the crash and did not arrive until after the crash.
I complained to the BBC about replacing the words following vehicles with paparazzI even when directly quoting the jury. The BBC response was this was that the judge in his summing up and drafting of the verdict had said he believed that following vehicles and paparazzI was the same thing. I responded to the BBC that the judge in his summing up also said that he did not believe that the following vehicles were being driven dangerously. A view that the Jury clearly rejected with there verdict. So what reason was there to assume that the Jury agreed with the judges opinion that the following vehicles and paparazzI were the same thing. Particularly as the judge made clear that the summing up would just examine some of the evidence and be his view. But That the jury were to examine all the evidence and come to there own view. Of course the BBC so called independent trust did not uphold my complaint.
October 2, 2014 @ 1:46 pm
Nahhh sounds like she is trying to write a novel and totally agree how can she remember all that info from one short telephone recording but can’t remember the name of the newspaper? What a load of bollocks. I never thought it was anything to do with the Al Fayeds anyway. I always wondered if she was bumped off for the same reason Jill Dando was. Diana must have known about Jimmy Savile being a complete paedo, and Jill and Diana were also both close friends with paedo Cliff Richard. What if she was also going to spill the beans on them all and word had got back somehow that she was going to do this, say via someone like Cliff who they might have mentioned it to, not knowing that he’s also part of the problem.
October 2, 2014 @ 1:50 pm
A right load of old bollocks is my highly technical opinion.
The idea of a male Mi5 agent having a female girlfriend is enough on its own to give it away as fabricated nonsense, let alone taking her back to a safe house and playing a ‘secret’ file he happened to keep on a USB for entertainment.
Timing of it is interesting though, as are the possible reasons for sending it through to you..
October 2, 2014 @ 2:12 pm
This bit was the ‘bullshit’ giveaway: “I asked him whether that was safe as I worried for his safety as anyone could locate him via his IP address..”
Most people don’t even know what an IP Address is, let alone how they function!
So in summary it certainly smells..
October 4, 2014 @ 10:07 pm
I dont have to worry about anyone finding my ip address, even I dont know where it is half the time. Just ask Gallows lol.
October 2, 2014 @ 2:14 pm
The name of the newspaper this psycho-disinformation troll fantasist can’t remember was the Mumbo-Jumbo Gazzete – which specialises in re-cycled bullshit.
October 2, 2014 @ 2:14 pm
The News of The World ceased publishing it’s litter tray liners on Sunday 10th July 2011…the announcement that it was to fold was on thursday 7th July 2011 (they do love those 7’s don’t they )…if ‘Rani’ didn’t meet her genius b/f until around April 2012…..the NOW didn’t actually exist…..having such an important story to recount I would have thought she’d remember which media outlet she would have spoken to…as others have stated ‘Rani’ is only telling a tale that The Establishment wants us to believe (which I don’t and never have)…just as a side thought…most spell the security services with Upper case letters ie: MI5 and MI6 not Mi5/Mi6…….this to me seems to be a deliberate mistake….I’m not taken in by this story at at and it seems too convenient that it turns up now
October 2, 2014 @ 2:21 pm
What a load of old bollocks is my opinion of this fairy-tale. An MI5 agent, who decides that a girlfriend he has been with for about 5 minutes is trustworthy enough to play a tape-recording to of Princess Diana’s last telephone conversation………Tell you something though Chris, it’s obvious you are rattling their cages if this load of old bullshit is the best that they can come up with in order to make the Windsors look innocent. Next thing they will be telling us is that Mandy does’t enjoy having rodents up his tradesmen’s entrance……lorraine
October 2, 2014 @ 2:31 pm
What a crock! A bit rich saying the SAS claim was a total fabrication because of the Official Secrets Act, yet ‘Adam’, who also will have signed the Act, not only let her listen to the recording but offered her a copy!
October 2, 2014 @ 2:49 pm
If She said He had a Smythson of Bond Street (Sam Cam) designer holdall in the bath, that He could climb in an out of and zip it up, I might have believed it !!
October 2, 2014 @ 3:25 pm
Too daft to laugh at.
waste of time.
October 2, 2014 @ 3:25 pm
Utter tosh.
October 2, 2014 @ 3:28 pm
Would have to agree with the rest of the good minded people on here if it looks like bullshit and smells like bullshit then its bullshit. I love the name Le Van Thanh (sounds like Van man) I don’t know how authentic that name is but the meaning of Thanh, according to Google, *The name is of the meaning “brilliant
consummation”.* Its origin is Vietnamese apparently.
October 2, 2014 @ 3:38 pm
Cringingly bad.
‘I remember Princess Diana saying the love of her life was Prince Charles and Camilla ruined her life and Charles had broken her heart. I will never forget how she said it as she said it with so much hurt in her voice and pain in her heart. Her family member told her there was nothing she can do about it and move on and assured her she will get over it.
Princess Diana then happily said…’
Hyper bi-polar then.
October 2, 2014 @ 3:48 pm
Wonder what Kez Wingfield is up to these days. I bet Trevor Rees – Jones often contemplates how different his life would have been if Kez had been the bodyguard of choice in that car on that night instead of him . Just a thought: Where WAS the second bodyguard when it all kicked off? Wonder if Adam knows? Wonder if he’d offer us a hint if we asked nicely.
October 2, 2014 @ 4:05 pm
I don’t know the inns and outs of both cases as there are a lot of suspicions and some pretty in depth reasoning, behind both deaths. However, I did say to several people, up to a year before both events that they wanted to watch themselves. I said this in a direct response to something Dando said about some very capable guys who were on Crimewatch, and also about Diana, by way of her tarnishing the Monarchy, and appearing to take delight by way of gaining masses of public sympathy that they would have liked for themselves, whilst at the same time she continued to make a mockery of them through her actions. I said this, and the people I had said it to were so shocked when both happened, that they phoned me up more or less immediately. It was in the early hours of the morning, regarding Diana and I was still in bed.
Make of that what you will. But I got them both right, and it was long before I was ever really aware of conspiracies in the manner that we are now aware of them. So, although Dando may have been going to spill the beans on Paedos, I was unaware of such activity, when I stated as she was doing one particular Crimewatch, “She wants to fucking well watch herself, as she is overstepping the mark from merely presenting information. And is turning herself into some kind of state sponsored mouthpiece, who is seeking to act as judge and jury, without knowing who the fuck she is dealing with”.
So, I have my own view on her and always have.
October 2, 2014 @ 6:15 pm
FTS, what did Dando say? and who were the “very capable guys? Thx.
October 3, 2014 @ 12:16 am
Nah, can’t say. Sorry. Secret code and all that. I admired their skills and she was not very nice about them. I would have took offence too. I know this sounds anal, but it’s not. It is just the way things are. Not for me to alert anyone as to when or where.
October 3, 2014 @ 8:55 am
Are you serious? “Secret code”? No offense mate but I dont understand. I didn’t ask when and where, I asked what did she say, that you claim she was murdered for, and to whom did she say it? It obviously was a BBC broadcast programme, that millions would have seen, so why the secret squirrel crap? Why not post a link?
October 3, 2014 @ 11:48 am
Gutsful ‘are you serious?’
Hi Gutsful. Fuck the state, like Chris and myself and others are privy to information that for one reason or another, we are unable to reveal to the whole world where that info. came from….or more importantly, WHO it came from. Whilst we are not afraid to put OURSELVES on the line, it would be immoral and cruel to put others in danger. I can certainly understand why you would demand ‘proof’ of where this info. came from, but the bottom line is this: You simply can not have the names. It is as simple as that. And you are free to make up your own mind what you want to believe. That is your absolute right, tc, Lorraine x
October 3, 2014 @ 12:44 pm
My thoughts and reasonings are my own. And with such a dangerous and still live incident, I am not prepared to say more than I have. I said she would get topped, long before she did. So in my opinion, that makes me a 1 in a several million person with regards to perception. If I am wrong and it was to do with Paedos or Barry George so be it. Not my business to poke my nose in. You surely have to understand the gravity of the situation. I do not wish to have to kill anyone at this time, and have no desire to make an enemy of those involved. Also, I have no desire to help the police. Fuck ’em.
October 3, 2014 @ 1:40 pm
…………………….”Hi Gutsful. Fuck the state, like Chris and myself and others are privy to information that for one reason or another, we are unable to reveal to the whole world where that info. came from….or more importantly, WHO it came from. Whilst we are not afraid to put OURSELVES on the line, it would be immoral and cruel to put others in danger”…………………………………..
Sorry to say this but this is beginning to sound more like a David Icke cosy Forum clique every day. I come on here for unbiased INFORMATION which I’m just not getting. What I AM getting is religious ‘ just believe in me’ type messages which frankly just aren’t good enough .Sorry no, I cannot just believe in you. There are times I don’t even believe in me actually!. There are plenty of ways to disseminate actual evidence without incriminating anybody. Incidentally I do think that Diana was murdered but any notion that she was a caring sharing sort of Mother Teresa is risible . All those late night hospital visits ostensibly to visit patients were in fact a ‘cover’ for her meetings with Dr Hasnat Khan. She deliberately let it be put about that the only time she could visit these patients was at night because of press intrusion. She was as much a user in her own way as any of them.
October 3, 2014 @ 1:52 pm
I understand people’s scepticism about the refusing to name sources. I prefer to use the word allegations or rumour, rather than I know for a fact. I may have inadvertently cost a man his life once before. He died in suspicious circumstances, but was not my source, although he did operate in the same unit. I believed what I was told (it was unsolicited info) but I cannot prove it. Only those directly involved know it…
October 3, 2014 @ 5:05 pm
Hi Calla-You’d have made a brilliant Detective-with your thorough analysis on these ‘conspiracies’ there’d be no innocent people locked up as you’re such a stickler for the facts.Even now with DNA people are still framed for various crimes.Mind you ie if i was innocently arrested for a murder i didn’t commit, at least i’d be 100% sure that you’d eventually catch the real culprit and bring them to justice…….TC Louise xx
October 3, 2014 @ 5:22 pm
“There are no facts, only interpretations.” – Friedrich Nietzsche
October 4, 2014 @ 11:49 am
Agreed. Why not simply provide the subject matter she was talking about on the programme being watched by millions at the time? No need to name names or breach ‘secret code’
October 4, 2014 @ 11:56 am
Calla, your post is bang on, some of the stuff posted is expected to be accepted on the basis of ‘blind faith’, the very antithesis of what I understood this site to be about.
October 4, 2014 @ 12:42 pm
Which is why i post info for people to make up their own minds. I happen to know some of Raine’s sources and whilst I understand people’s reluctance to believe some info, she shouldn’t be expected to give out names and addresses of sources. It’s why I tend to use the term alleged/supposedly/rumours for stuff told to me or that I find doing research. I may believe something to be true, but proving it is nigh on impossible. On that basis, I presume that nobody here is religious…
October 4, 2014 @ 8:20 pm
Dogman, I think you’ve probably misunderstood. My comments were in support of calla and gutsful. I have no issue with Lorraine’s comment, other than it seems to miss the point as to why the program subject matter FTS referred to could not be spoken about here, rather than be obscured reference to ‘secret codes’ and the fact that apparently you’re ‘privy to information that for one reason or another, we are unable to reveal to the whole world’. It all sounds a bit weird.
October 4, 2014 @ 8:28 pm
Sorry fella, apologies. I can’t answer for FTS. But it’s like religion, you either believe it or move on.
October 5, 2014 @ 7:32 pm
That’s interesting FTS, you dont think it was to do with paedos or George. That would rule out an establishment sponsored hit. That for me leaves the Serbian revenge angle. There may be more suspects I dont know about though obviously. That list that Dogman put out of crimewatch episodes is gonna take some time to go through.
October 3, 2014 @ 12:24 am
Hiya Gutsful. With respect it wasn’t Louise who said that she knows ‘for a fact’ certain things about Diana; IT WAS ME. I just didn’t want anyone being brought to task for something that I had said. tc, lorraine x
October 3, 2014 @ 8:39 am
Hi raine, I’m sorry for that mistake, I could have sworn I saw Louise say it too. Looks like me and Calla made the same error. Another thing I would like to say to you is, please dont think I am being argumentative, I always talk online as if we were all in the pub together and questioning each other on where we got our info, and why we believe what we do etc.
October 3, 2014 @ 10:32 am
Hi Gutsful. No offence taken mate. We are all entitled to our own opinions, and I respect your right to that, tc, lorraine x
October 10, 2014 @ 12:53 pm
On behalf of fts…Listen you folks. I do not care what you think. I am well aware of what I said and when. And it is not a case of being privy to information in this instance. It is a case of being on the ball. Irrespective of anyone’s angle. I was right. So, if you had done such a thing, and you thought the people responsible were still out and about, would you be so keen to spout your mouths off??? No, so you are either thick coppers fishing for info as you are not of a criminal mindset, or are some people who want everything lobbing on a plate for you!!! Either way, it does not matter to me. If you are so interested watch the previous 2 years of Crimewatch to be on the safe side.
October 2, 2014 @ 4:12 pm
Pissing myself laughing at this total crock of shit, too well written with too much detail with a bit of convenient amnesia thrown in for good measure. This will clearly convince the retards and morons that make up the audience of the X Fuckter that Diana died in an accidental car crash, but those fucktards and others like them can barely manage to button there own shirts. I arrived home with some friends on the night that the assassination took place and remember watching it on the news (either BBC or ITV can’t remember which) as the emergency services were attending. One of the girls in our company got very excited when it was announced that Diana was injured but alive. We began to pay a little bit more attention of what was being reported and after about 5 mins the reporter categorically stated the he saw an injured Diana being helped into an ambulance, she was allegedly walking with the help of two other people. Now, this same girl was cockahoop that the Princess was alive and well but her face soon changed and her jaw dropped when we pointed out that she would, infact , be dead by the morning. All of the guys (4 of us) believed that she would be executed before the light of day but none of the girls did. My point is this, did this reporter (either BBC or ITV) actually witness these events or did he make the whole thing up for dramatic effect, who knows or fucking cares she was after all, part of the 1% who look down there noses at the rest of us mere mortals. Pretending to give a fuck about the common man in order to get what she wanted when she got turfed out of the Gravy Train Club does not give her credibility in my book, she was a rich scrounging waste of space like the rest of her inbred clan and I for one don’t give a fuck what actually happened. I know there are people out there who would like to get to the truth and good luck to you if you are such a person but I will bet you this, my £100 to your worthless Penny that you nor anyone else will be able to get there hands on the archived report that would maybe help in your pursuit of the truth. If you do manage to get your hands on the recordings I am sure Chris will let you post it on this website and I will gladly pay out your winnings but that aint gonna happen. Keep up the good fight guys and don’t believe the hype. PEACE.
October 2, 2014 @ 4:13 pm
sounds like a fantasist to me or maybe the secret service man who was slipping her a length was taking her for a ride in more ways then one…
regarding the peoples princess, whilst its obviously clear she was murdered, i don’t really care personally as she was just one of the elite classes who had served her purpose and was dispatched… i mean its not as if she was blown up by a landmine on one of her supposed anti landmine crusades, she was taken out on what was for her just a normal night… top hotel, millionaire playboy boyfriend, bodyguard, chauffer driven merc… of course she couldn’t resist a photo opportunity with a starving child and i’m sure she will of had a personal secretary to reply to letters and faxes on her behalf but she was really just your typical rich ‘tart’ who thought the world revolved around her and she later found out it clearly didn’t!
October 2, 2014 @ 4:51 pm
Lord Stevens was being paid £1000 a day during the Met’s enquiry (twice his usual salary) and the (then) Deputy Coroner of the Queen’s Household Lady Elizabeth Butler-Sloss conducted the preliminary hearings into the inquests in early 2007.
Claims that Diana, Princess of Wales, was murdered by the SAS did not emerge in Scotland Yard’s “thorough and far-reaching” investigation into her death, according to Lord Stevens.
On 15 May 2007, it was revealed by Baroness Butler-Sloss that the underlying material collected by the criminal investigation team runs to more than 11,000 pages when printed out and also consists of more than 1,400 photographs, several DVDs, large-sized plans and other data. The material has substantially been disclosed to the interested persons and legal teams.
So when did the SAS story come out into the public domain?
October 2, 2014 @ 5:26 pm
hear hear…………….
Diana may have looked like a puppy in most of the pics we saw of her, but we {the peasants] didn’t know what she was actually getting up to behind the scenes. Guilty by association.
And if she was so caring, then she could have exposed Saville, after all he was expendable as he wasn’t a royal…… OR was he?
October 2, 2014 @ 5:50 pm
Anyone know or got any theories as to why they wouldn’t give Al Fayed a british passport. They hand them out like confetti to anyone who sets foot on these shores yet they wouldn’t let him have one. He lived here for decades and had british-born children, think his wife might be english too. What rights does a passport bestow that they didn’t want him to have?
October 2, 2014 @ 6:28 pm
Al Fayed hates the Royal family & this seems to be replicated. I can only imagine this feud started many years ago & as of yet we have not been made aware of the whole truth. How much he hates them comes across in the excellent documentary Unlawful Killing which was funded by Al Fayed which was made to document the Independent inquiry in to Diana’s murder that he had campaigned for. The documentary was banned in the UK but can be sourced easily. Al Fayed only bought Harrods to get up their noses & alas I think it was Diana’s relationship with his son Dodi that sealed her fate not because he was a muslim but because he was Al Fayed’s son.
October 2, 2014 @ 7:09 pm
But his hatred of them seems to have a lot to do with not getting a passport. He spent years and millions of pounds sucking up to the royals and their ilk, only to find that they looked down on him as a foreigner. He was furious coz they were happy enough to treat him as one of their own when he was splashing money around but wouldn’t give him a passport.
October 2, 2014 @ 8:18 pm
I don’t know why he was not given a passport, there is more to this than meets the eye. We have very loose immigration laws in this country to say the least & in countries that have a much tighter system there is one criteria that will always guarantee you a way in & that as Cliff Richard has proved recently by becoming a Barbadian national is money! Al Fayed has plenty of money but must have been seen as some sort of threat to the establishment.
October 4, 2014 @ 8:33 pm
Fayed- (the Al prefix was added by him for gravitas) has had some very dodgy friends and also upset some big hitters- Tiny Rowland for one. The phoney Pharoah is not all he seems- his latest wife Heine is Finnish by the way.
The old Fugger sold Harrods after saying he never would and buggered off after a spat with the Taxman- unfortunately he returned…….
October 2, 2014 @ 6:11 pm
@blee-blah.
it was the ears,she loved.
October 2, 2014 @ 6:31 pm
I know it was reported but is it true that the BMW was not allowed to go back to the manufacturer to be inspected? It could have been a unknown fault that caused the crash as far as BMW were concerned.
October 2, 2014 @ 9:11 pm
Has anyone read Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence by Jon King & John Beveridge? They seem to lay it at the door of our spooks with CIA help.
One would expect that with the financial means Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana had at their disposal there was absolutely no reason why they should have been chauffeured in a vehicle that had been snatched at gunpoint a few days prior to the fateful night of August 31, 1997.
The car in which the ill-fated couple was travelling, a Mercedes Benz S280, had been stolen some days prior to the crash. This fact on its own is perhaps at best nothing more than pure coincidence but where that event turns decidedly strange is how that very Mercedes was returned a few days earlier in pristine condition save for one very important aspect…
THE ONBOARD COMPUTER CHIP WAS MISSING FROM THE STOLEN MERCEDES!
The onboard computer chip controls, amongst other things, navigation, acceleration, steering and braking of a vehicle. Considering that Princess Diana’s death was due to a car crash, the fact that the Mercedes S280 involved in the crash had its onboard computer chip stolen some days earlier (and nothing else mind you…suggesting the car-snatchers were no ordinary thieves) pushes the pervasive accident account onto firmer conspiracy territory.
Princess Diana ultimately died because of a suspicious 2 hour journey in an ambulance that snailed its way to a hospital 3.25 miles away averaging a speed of 25 mph and which conveniently bypassed 4 other hospitals on the way!
As it is there is new evidence that indicates that perhaps the reason Princess Diana was not wearing her seatbelt is because it was mysteriously but very conveniently jammed in such a way as to render it unusable!
Source is ht tp://princess-diana-life-n-death.blogspot.co.uk/2007/06/princess-dianas-death-mystery-of-stolen.html
October 2, 2014 @ 10:43 pm
It was a Mercedes? My memory is getting fking worse by the day. Im sure I’ve made the same mistake before.
October 3, 2014 @ 10:28 am
I heard that she was enbalmed within an hour of arriving at the hospital…
October 4, 2014 @ 12:13 am
Hence the delay…..Hello! Was Gelly Baby there…..who the fuck knows……
October 5, 2014 @ 1:46 pm
Hey Wiggins, I am sure I read somewhere that he was in the ambulance. That must be a crock surely. BTW, what do you think of that Arabian Prince that has just bought 50% of your football club? Could be good news or bad.
October 7, 2014 @ 5:34 am
it makes you wonder if he was there as he seems to have such a hold over tptb that he has some info that they are shit scared of coming out i.e she was bumped off in the back of the ambulance.
in normal circumstances he would have been suicided but maybe he has the evidence hidden away as a security backup for himself
just saying
October 3, 2014 @ 7:33 am
BMW don’t inspect Mercedes !.
October 3, 2014 @ 9:04 am
Haha, I know that now mate lol. I will try again, Were MERCEDES denied access to the car? I hope no-one posts, It wasn’t a Mercedes, it was a fking Lada, I will shoot myself.
October 5, 2014 @ 9:51 pm
Hi Gutsful. I agree with you that there are certainly plenty of evil people around and you only have to take a look at the people that are ruling us to see that! I have recently read the brilliant book by John Hamer called ‘The Falsification of History.’ I don’t know if you have read this book Gutsful, but the research and detail that Mr. Hamer has put in to this book is second to none and I highly recommend it. I am sure that you have heard or read Gutsful (as many of us have) that on the night in question, Diana actually walked in to the ambulance; now I am NOT stating this as a fact because I don’t know, but I am just saying that this is something that SOME people have said they saw on the news when reports of Diana’s ‘accident’ began to surface on the news. And as Wiggins has stated, it has also been suggested that gellybean was one of the Doctors involved in ‘caring’ for Diana in the ambulance. Again, I don’t know if this is a FACT, but just saying what many of us have heard. Is it true about gellybean? I was saying to someone else earlier Gutsful that very often you have to use the law of averages when making your mind up about something. As an ex military Man I am sure you have had to do this on many occasions yourself. For example, you have to question WHY the entire establishment came to the aid of gellybean and his missus when there are scores (hundreds in fact) of British kids that go missing every year. For instance the case of little Ben Needham who went missing in Greece some twenty-odd years ago and has never been seen since. The British establishment of the day didn’t give a toss…..so why was this particular case so important to them? Why was gellybean so important to them? And you have to ask yourself why what should have been a short journey to the hospital took about 35 minutes, when by which time Diana was dead. (I think it was 35 minutes but if it was longer I apologise because off-hand I am not EXACTLY sure but I THINK it was 35 minutes). I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong on the exact time the ambulance took to get there. The point being that when you put all the circumstantial evidence together, you come to only one viable conclusion. And as I pointed out to someone earlier, circumstantial evidence is often used in our courts of law to convict a person. One tiny thread does not a conviction make…..but when you have dozens and dozens of tiny threads, a picture begins to emerge. Anyway mate, good talking to you, tc, lorraine x
October 6, 2014 @ 10:40 am
Hi Gutsful-Lady Die-The Diana Conspiracy may answer some of your questions will give you a good account of this fatal day….TC Louise xx
October 2, 2014 @ 6:33 pm
1. Typing emails from a phone is time consuming and would take ages unless she is a whizz at little sensitive screens.
2. So they allow you to charge phones at libraries now do they?
October 2, 2014 @ 9:03 pm
If you do it via a usb cable from one of the computers the staff don’t notice.
October 2, 2014 @ 7:16 pm
This paparazzo who has been following prince george around is rubbish at his job. Where are all the photos hes taken? Is it a warning to paps in general to leave the royals alone so we can’t scrutinise ‘pregnant’ kate?
October 2, 2014 @ 7:53 pm
I read it all carefully. As working on and analysing texts of all types is part of my daily work, I can tell you that it is a fake and not a very high class one at that. There are so many giveaways that it has been “concocted”. I wish the people who wrote these things didn’t have such a lack of respect for our collective intelligence or at least that they hired someone with a few more skills. This is juvenile.
October 3, 2014 @ 9:23 am
Oh it’s definitely fake, deliberately so imho. It reminds me of Obama’s birth certificate. The fact that it is deliberately done this way rules out a fantasist crank for me, and I have to say Chris does not strike me as the sort of person who is easily fooled. If this is the “security” goons it will confirm that they are employing imbeciles, or this message has another purpose, as yet unknown.
October 7, 2014 @ 5:38 am
maybe related to chris’s recent illegal arrest due to the fact the knobhead plod have his computers and his diana article he is writing,seems a bit of a coincidence
October 2, 2014 @ 7:53 pm
just not buying this sounds like a big set up towards you .avoid it at all costs ,you certainly don’t need her information about anything ,you are more than capable of your own research .Don’t like the sound of this one bit .
October 2, 2014 @ 8:04 pm
Hi Chris,
Rani, a budding script writer perhaps, if she’s going to come up with shite like that story she should really research her lies first, below a copy and paste from Mi5 website, “Adam offered me a copy of the audio tape” LMFAO!
If I join who can I tell about where I work?
During the application process you must limit those you tell about your application to your partner or a close family member. Should your application be successful, you will be given a full briefing on the reasons why it is important not to disclose that you work for the Security Service and what to say if people ask you or your family about your career.
—————————————
You must be the sort of person who does not need to discuss your work with your friends and family. You will be involved with important work and proud of your contribution. If publicly celebrating your career successes is important to you, however, you should reconsider your suitability for working at MI5.
—————————————
You’re a far wiser and knowledgable person than “Rani” Chris.
Funny reading though!
October 2, 2014 @ 8:07 pm
Sorry Chris…..I wouldn’t fall for that bullshit…I know you didn’t.
October 2, 2014 @ 8:34 pm
Nice one Chris, it seems that the PR department of LizardBreath 11 aka Corrupt Sycophants Inc. is in overdrive 😉
‘Rani’ in Hindi is Queen in English
How very clever we are!
October 2, 2014 @ 9:59 pm
Gutsful and Calla.
Whilst I am not in the least bit concerned what the vile scumbags do to me, I AM concerned about putting other people at risk, and just like you can not expect Chris (or anyone else)l to divulge where all their info. comes from, then you can not expect it from me either. You can believe it or not, it’s your choice. But it IS THE TRUTH. tc, lorraine
October 2, 2014 @ 10:59 pm
I’m sorry raine, that explanation is not good enough for me. You are probably 100% sincere, but I need solid evidence and proof before I believe anything. I trust absolutely no-one online or offline. I dont trust chris either. This is nothing personal it’s just the way I am. I certainly dont mean to offend anyone.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:04 pm
Fair enough gutsfull. I’m with Raine on this. Knowing something and putting somebody at risk to prove it won’t happen.It’s up to everybody to each their own conclusions about whatever they read anywhere.
October 2, 2014 @ 11:41 pm
That’s fair enough too dogman. I am just a real stickler for trying to get as much info as possible. and I will push too hard on occasion. I actually used to enjoy interrogating “bad guys”. I dont mean in a sadistic manner, just words and information that could be used to force cooperation. I just wish I could be let loose on Westminster.I must confess I would gladly use some other techniques on those bastards.
October 3, 2014 @ 12:02 am
That’s okay Gutsful. I understand where you’re coming from. tc, lorraine x
October 3, 2014 @ 12:04 am
Hiya Dogman. Thanks for understanding where I’m coming from mate, tc, speak soon, lorraine xxxx
October 3, 2014 @ 9:01 am
True Dogman. We must all reach our own conclusions but mine are always based on best evidence. If that isn’t forthcoming it remains for me just another conspiracy theory that may or may not be true. The problem is at the moment there are literally hundreds of these theories doing the rounds and it would be such an accomplishment to cross one off the list as ‘proved.’ Unfortunately someone ‘knowing’ doesn’t cut it for me. This is in no way intended as a criticism raine 1 ………………we’re all here on a search together after all …………………………but I do find it frustrating when people say they KNOW but go no further .basically all we’re left with is a wink and a nod.
October 3, 2014 @ 9:34 am
Calla, I agree with you 100%. The old “I know for a fact” just should not wash with any true investigator, including Raine herself, who I’m sure is as sincere and good hearted as most.
October 3, 2014 @ 9:56 am
Gutsful, morning, Your comments are automatically being diverted to the spam file, your IP is changing from the midlands UK to Southern ireland and then to wales, also service provider is changing.
Any idea why this could be?
October 3, 2014 @ 11:02 am
Calla
Hi Calla. With respect I can only repeat what I have already said: That whilst I couldn’t care less what the-powers-that-be do to me (fuck ’em), I DO care about putting others in danger. However, I DO acknowledge that it can be frustrating to be told something and then to also be told that there can be no mention of the people who provided said information. And of course it is your absolute prerogative to believe whatever you like. I respect your right to hold your own views. That is entirely your business, tc, lorraine x
October 4, 2014 @ 12:42 pm
Hi Lorraine-You’re doing the right thing by not divulging any names as you probably promised their anonymity to these people. A true friend does not betray anyone’s confidence -especially where such a sensitive subject is being discussed-That old saying ‘Careless talk costs lives’ is unfortunately so true in some cases. It doesn’t matter if some disbelieve you as i’m sure if they were in the same position they’d probably wouldn’t break their promise not to divulge a person’s name as well just to prove a point…….TC Louise xx
October 4, 2014 @ 1:06 pm
Thing is people, you all read AM sites and weigh up what you choose to believe in the same way that you would the MSM. Gordon Duff (Veterans Today) admits to posting 40% disinfo (to be able to exist) and Alex Jones has now fully admitted that half his family are retired CIA! Here’s the clip where he admits that his family his riddled with spies. He says about 50% of his family reunions are ex-CIA! And of course even Alex admits that once you are CIA you are always CIA. You never really retire! Here’s the video clip. http://ww w.youtube.com/watch?v=p6CSjj3HT7E
Nick Davies’s book Flat Earth News (interesting read)
After years of working as a respected journalist, Nick Davies broke the unwritten rule of the media by investigating the practices of his fellow colleagues. In this eye-opening exposé, Davies uncovers an industry awash in corruption and bias. His findings include the story of a prestigious Sunday newspaper that allowed the CIA to plant fiction in its columns; the newsroom that routinely rejects stories about black people; the respected paper that hired a professional fraudster to set up a front company to entrap senior political figures; as well as a number of newspapers that pay cash bribes to bent detectives. His research also exposes a range of national stories that were in fact pseudo events manufactured by the public relations industry and global news stories that were fiction generated by a machinery of international propaganda. The degree to which the media industry has affected government policy and perverted popular belief is also addressed.
Nobody is forced to believe ANYTHING, it is all a matter of discernment and if you get put off by comments by other people, you will find life gets very lonely! I just read around bits I don’t like/agree with.
October 4, 2014 @ 1:24 pm
From the Independent Wednesday 16 March 2005 (by Danielle Demetriou)
Conspiracy theories surrounding the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, were fuelled yesterday after it emerged that the car in which she was meant to have travelled failed to start.
Diana, 36, and her 42-year-old lover Dodi Al Fayed, instead entered a nearby Mercedes driven by the chauffeur Henri Paul before all three were killed after crashing in a Paris underpass. The last-minute switch in cars came to light with the release of official documents by the Cabinet Office under the Freedom of Information Act, which included correspondence between officials in the aftermath of the event.
It was in a memo sent to the Prime Minister a few hours after the Princess was killed on 31 August 1997 that it was first suggested that the car in which she had been expected to travel had broken down.
The document, whose author was not revealed, read: “The Princess and Dodi al Fayed arrived at the Paris Ritz yesterday afternoon. When they left the hotel late last night they were surrounded by a number of journalists. They tried to leave quickly but the first hire car failed to start. The second car then left the hotel at speed.”
A second document released yesterday corroborated the claim of a broken down car. Signed “Jay”, it was sent from Paris on the same day to Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, who was in Singapore. The British ambassador to France at the time was Sir Michael Jay. Describing the couple’s departure from the Ritz, it read: “Their getaway car failed to start, they got into another nearby car driven by a Ritz driver.”
However, conflicting accounts appeared in a third document also released yesterday, which claimed that the couple had entered the car in a bid to avoid paparazzi photographers. It was in a document sent by Sir Michael to the Foreign Office on 23 September that it was claimed that the couple had switched cars as part of a “last-minute change of plan aimed at diverting the paparazzi”.
October 4, 2014 @ 1:36 am
Raine1, You are 100% on being discreet and that really should be accepted by everyone as the end of that,so to type, hahaha, i ‘m sure that it is better not to divulge in naming names than to give one for the hell of it like ‘Joe Bloggs’, although would that make any difference, i do not think it would, but your integrity does and it shows,which i am sure that you both can see by now Calla & gutsful, i also will not give out name/s in certain circumstances, smiling like Chelsea is for one, hahaha. “Good on you Lorraine, bless ya” X x
October 4, 2014 @ 4:41 pm
icit2
Thanks mate. Your support is much appreciated, tc, lorraine xx
October 4, 2014 @ 10:56 pm
Icit 2, I can well understand raine and fts not giving out names, I never even ask them to. What I dont understand is fts not even telling us where we can get access to that particular crimewatch episode, so I could see what she said and about who she said it. How would this be endangering anyone?
October 4, 2014 @ 11:14 pm
Supposedly, a full list of Crimewatch articles to wade thru –
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&sqi=2&ved=0CDsQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ranker.com%2Flist%2Ffull-list-of-crimewatch-uk-episodes%2Freference&ei=_XAwVNfrH7GV7AazvIGoBg&usg=AFQjCNHK4VsGf4nYe-31XaEKeTrnJrdTcg&bvm=bv.76802529,d.ZWU
October 4, 2014 @ 11:42 pm
Icit 2, I can well understand raine and fts not giving out names, I never even ask them to. What I dont understand is fts not even telling us where we can get access to that particular crimewatch episode, so I could see what she said and about who she said it. How would this be endangering anyone?
October 4, 2014 @ 11:44 pm
Thanks DM, much appreciated.
October 2, 2014 @ 10:00 pm
Not even a set up just meant to wind you up and waste your time……… I remember the first time my boyfriend took me back to his flat, there were some tubs of flowers either side of door, geraniums I think, I can’t be sure, a couple of slugs were sliming across the path and I remember thinking I’d better not unsurp one. We went inside and I wiped my feet on the mat which had the words ‘Elvis is in the house’ crossed out and replaced with ‘Gareth is in the bath.’
He said he was going to show me something, something that had been missing for a very long time, something that people in alternative media had been discussing for over a year, trying to work out its whereabouts but hadn’t even got close…… I think he was beginning to get on my fucking nerves when he finally produced this handbag, it was only when I opened it and read the label ‘THIS BAG BELONGS TO INGRID’ that I realised the enormity of what I was seeing.
October 2, 2014 @ 10:20 pm
LMAO. Thanks Sue
October 2, 2014 @ 11:42 pm
BRITISH spies would have recorded the last moments of Princess Diana and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed by bugging their mobile phones, it is claimed.
A key UK security industry source who served in the military told the Sunday Express that GCHQ remotely switched on recorder modes right up to the moment the couple took their fatal Paris car trip. If made public, the phone recordings could help throw light on sensational claims by former SAS serviceman Soldier N that Diana was murdered by an SAS assassination squad.
The bugging claim came as a separate Sunday Express investigation revealed that film footage of Diana’s last hours was “kept secret”. An exhaustive inquiry in the French capital has confirmed the existence of CCTV records of the night Diana died in August 1997.
Many belong to private companies who used France’s strict privacy laws to avoid having to hand them over to the police.
Source – http://ww w.express.co.uk/news/uk/429557/DONAL-MACINTYRE-INVESTIGATION-Spies-taped-Diana-s-crash-and-bugged-her-phone
October 2, 2014 @ 11:47 pm
The Daily Express uncovered dramatic information which undermines the French police claim that photographer James Andanson doused himself and his black BMW with petrol and set himself alight.
Andanson was found dead in his burnt-out car three years after the smash which killed Diana, her lover Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul.
Andanson, suspected of causing the crash by driving a white Fiat Uno into their Mercedes, was said officially to have committed suicide.
But investigators have uncovered a receipt which shows that although Andanson, 54, did buy a substantial amount of fuel on the day he died, it was diesel, not petrol.
Unlike petrol, diesel is not highly inflammable at normal temperatures and would not have ignited if he had struck a match.
You would not be able to set light to diesel with a match.
He used his credit card to buy more than 100 litres of diesel on a visit to a hypermarket near Nant, southern France.
Sceptics would say it is far more likely that the experienced paparazzo bought it to fill up his car for the 400-mile journey back to his home in central France.
They would also think it unlikely for him to prepare his car for a long trip if he planned to kill himself just a few miles away.
The development could support the theory that Andanson was murdered by the security services.
Dodi’s father Mohamed Al Fayed believes he was on the intelligence payroll and that he was killed to stop him exposing a plot to assassinate his son and the Princess.
The Harrods owner’s belief is supported by the evidence of a new witness, a policeman, who said he saw what looked like a bullet hole in the dead photographer’s head.
The officer backs up claims by Christophe Pelat, the fireman who discovered the body, that Andanson had been shot in the head.
Two months ago, Pelat said: “I saw him at close range and I’m absolutely convinced that he had been shot in the head.”
Yesterday’s revelation came just days after the police officer who ran the initial inquiry into how Diana died in Paris’s Alma tunnel blamed the Fiat driver.
Jean Claude Mules said he had compelling evidence that the black Mercedes collided with the Fiat seconds before it ploughed into a pillar. He said his officers would have “had their killer” if they had succeeded in tracing the driver.
Andanson was found dead on May 4 2000 in woodland alongside a country road near Nant, in the Aveyron region of France.
He had apparently left his wife Elizabeth, 45, at their farmhouse in Lignieres, 170 miles south of Paris, and driven 400 miles south to Nant.
A police spokesman said at the time: “He took his own life by dousing himself and the car with petrol and then setting light to it.”
But Andanson’s credit card records show he went into a Géant hypermarket just a few miles away from where he was found dead.
He bought more than 100 litres of diesel and spent almost 600 francs.
Investigators are not certain what he did with the fuel. But his BMW 3 series’ saloon would hold only 60 litres and he may have filled up and transported the surplus in cans. Critically, experts say that it is inconceivable that Andanson would buy diesel to set himself alight.
Ray Holloway, of the Petrol Retailers Association, said: “With petrol it is the vapour that is the risk. It’s very different with diesel.
“Diesel is warmed and compressed to make it fire. You wouldn’t be able to set light to diesel with a match. It would just go out. “The flashpoint for diesel, that is the temperature it would need to get to, is something like 63C. “You would need to warm diesel up with something like a blow torch to have any hope of igniting it, and even then you would probably have to be in a confined space. “People often get burned when using petrol because they try setting light to the liquid. But what happens is the vapour ignites first.”
The riddle of Andanson’s death will be looked at by Lord Justice Scott Baker, the judge appointed to oversee Diana’s inquest. He has produced a list of 20 questions about the accident which most people assumed had been answered but which must now be re-examined.
Former MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson once alleged they use the paparazzi because they are good at tracking the whereabouts of high profile “targets”.
Source is dailyexpress
October 3, 2014 @ 1:31 am
I read the first few paragraphs and I will read the rest tomorrow. But just from those words I read, that’s not someone in fear of there life or anything alike.
It sounds like some posh toff writing there fucking GCSE creative story essay….
”I didn’t believe Adam at first, I thought he was pulling my leg and I asked him to prove it and Adam agreed happily. Adam was smart and had a first class degree in computer science and mathematics from Cambridge university so I wasn’t going to be that shocked if Mi5 did swoop up my genius boyfriend to work for them as he was a computer whizz and a good problem solver whatever the situation.”
To me that’s not how normal people speak or describe events, that’s a fucking journalist or someone trying to come across as a genuine article.
Sounds like a chimp to me.
October 3, 2014 @ 3:37 am
One spook claims Richard Tomlinson was up to his neck in all kinds of shit, inc filming Diana’s last moments in the ambulance getting ”treatment”
October 3, 2014 @ 3:54 am
If you break ranks you will be labelled , via the media , as a crank , nutcase , etc etc , odd how our heroine (Ingrid of Pigby shit) of just over 17 months ago was sectioned and now is not heard of , bet she will be in the next 48hrs , as the Chimp and the so called intelligence services (LMFAO) monitor this and many other sites , well if our so called intelligence services employ people of the same IQ and inbreeding as our MP’s etc , whatever you do , don’t send them a 2 piece jigsaw puzzle without instructions or a painting by numbers book , as 5 will say its 6 and vice a versa , lol , POA , Legal Advisor to Tittsworth & Grabbe and Goodnight.
October 3, 2014 @ 1:20 am
Seeings as there is a character called Adam who works for MI5 in the long running tv programme Spooks, I find this even more ridiculous! Seriously where is Harry? Was he busy during this tell all confessional from someone ,by her own admission , who was a very intelligent and professional man who was deemed the right man for our security services… Geeeez, its the Profumo Affair all over again… When will these men quit thinking with their nethers? And when will our Security Services recruiting department start seriously vetting these people?? What a cracking advert for our Spooks Rani?! Hahaha… She is probably one of these people that think the SAS really walk round with a black strip across their eyes…. Ffs…..
October 3, 2014 @ 2:32 am
Ooooh right in the crutch that was lol , POA , Legal Advisor to Tittsworth & Grabbe and Goodnight.
October 3, 2014 @ 1:45 am
Ps: I think chris probably put this out there to gauge a reaction to see if people agreed to what he more than likely though himself.
Although if that’s not the case then Chris man come on pal I am sure you surely seen through that shite. The way you worded your article was subjective especially to those who may be new viewers.
If this lady was shitting bricks like she says, it’s took her two years to pipe up about it now…..fishy ummm I think more fishy than bizzy lizzys grotto (as in bat cave, as in minge, or tuppance to the posh among us)
FUCK THE QUEEN, FUCK ALL THOSE ABSOLUTE PONCE CUNTS IN POWER THESE CUNTS ARE THE ABSOLUTE NUGGETS WHO RUN THINGS…IT’S A JOKE. Anyone with a set of balks and a concience in the POLICE, ARMY, etc…need to man the fuck up and take back our country. No race, religion, or views come into it were all fucking humans who let absolute physco’s run our country it’s absolutly insane!!
RISE UP AND TAKE THEM OUT
October 3, 2014 @ 2:09 am
“After dining out, Adam and I went back to Adam’s glamourous flat in Victoria, London, where I now presume was a safe house where other agents lived with a high security alarm system which was fitted in all the flats inside the beautiful white crisp stucco-fronted apartments block with vibrant flowers adorned on all the windowsills and tall grey square pots containing colourful plants at either side of the big black communal door”
Sorry,I drove from Falkirk in central Scotland to London today/yesterday..and have just had time to read this.
Reading the above quote from a supposed ex-girlfreind of an M16 guy….Who the hell would describe anything as poeticly as that? Apart from someone writing something they made up….You know….like fictional type writers of fictional novels ..and that…you know…like somfing wot they made up and that,,…
That,or the writers are far more intelligent than they think we are.
October 3, 2014 @ 8:02 am
All we have to do is find the “glamourous flat in Victoria London, fitted with a high security alarm system”. That shouldnt be too hard. We’re helped in our search by knowing the flats are “beautiful white crisp stucco-fronted apartment blocks with vibrant flowers adorned on all the windowsills and tall grey square pots containing colourful plants at either side of the big black communal door”. What a load of bollocks.
Lets stop pretending that Diana Spencer was anything other than a dozy Sloane. Lets stop pretending that Fayed was not complicit in the deaths of both Dodi and Diana.
October 3, 2014 @ 3:50 am
Oh for fuksake everyone.. stop talking as if this Rani exists.. she’s a concocted character… that’s how psyops work.
Anyway, the funny thing is, after reading this pathetic propaganda effort posing as an email… I’m more convinced now than ever that Diana was in fact murdered.
And the really.. really funny bit is when the MI5 officer offers her a copy of the USB contents… cos that’s just what they’re trained to do.. ha ha haa!
October 3, 2014 @ 6:27 am
Yeapp !! The whole story smell of bovine excrement…..
Can someone explain, why the Ambulance with Diana was driving at 20 Kmh to the Emergency Hospital & it has taken nearly half hour to get there & not about 2 to 3 minutes as it should have. then the driver of the Merc was sober, but his blood sample was switched to someone who died of a drug overdose & high alcohol content in his blood.
Coincidence??? I’m not a Coincidence Theorist. But a Conspiracy Theorist
Note. I don’t wear a aluminium tin hat!
October 3, 2014 @ 8:01 pm
I recall hearing that different hospitals in the area took emergencies and on that particular day/night it was the turn of the hospital furthest away (how convenient). I recall the doctor saying that he did not know that Diana was in the accident and they went slowly due to her condition. This is the story that I remember hearing. Sounds ludicrous but that’s what I heard.
October 3, 2014 @ 8:48 am
Off Topic-7.30pm on ch4 tonight unreported world about the horrendous dog meat trade in Vietnam to raise awareness of these poor creatures-for those of you brave enough to watch it-I for one WILL NOT be watching it too heart breaking.But i feel people need to know what’s happening so they can put a stop to this vile trade-Sorry for being off topic…..xx
October 3, 2014 @ 10:18 am
@ Louise, I had to stop watching any programmes concerning animal abuse, as I was so ill for days after. I couldn’t erase the scenes from my mind.
The only one I watch at the moment is “For the love of dogs with Paul O’ Grady as they always have good endings!
October 3, 2014 @ 4:09 pm
Hi Question everything-I to feel the same as you-Apparently according to a Soi-dogs report the Thai Government has had to introduce stricter boarder controls into Vietnam as the problem is increasing of dogs being smuggled into the Country-so now the evil wicked scum has resorted to stealing people’s pets for the meat-trade-IT MUST BE STOPPED……TC Louise xx……Sorry off topic but this is so close to my heart….xx
October 3, 2014 @ 6:25 pm
Hi Louise. Hope you and yours are well. I wasn’t aware of this trade in Dog meat in Vietnam. I wish I had the courage to watch it, but as I love Dogs I would be sobbing too much to take in what was being said. I wish I knew how to stop this horror. What a world hey? But the fight goes on, always good talking to you, tc mate, lorraine, xx
October 3, 2014 @ 8:48 pm
Hi Lorraine and Question everything-iff you google soi dog foundation and log onto Stop the dog meat trade there’s a petitition you can sign if you wish to do so to help to stop this barbaric trade-thanks TC Louise xx
October 3, 2014 @ 9:39 pm
Hi Raine, you are right not to watch these videos. I really hope you never see one. The message can be attempted to get out there, but I have lived among these people, as well as other people’s in many countries on many continents, due to my military career IN THE WAY DISTANT PAST. I can tell you that what we would consider cruel, these people just consider normal. I have personally been in a few situations where I have ordered them to stop what they were doing, only to be met by looks of total confusion and sometimes outright aggression and threats to my men. I soon wised up.
October 3, 2014 @ 10:00 pm
Hiya Gutsful. I really wish I had the stomach to watch this kind of stuff because I like to see and hear for myself about what is really going on, but when it comes to Animal abuse, I am completely hopeless. It would make me feel ill for days afterwards. Anyway tc, Lorraine x
October 4, 2014 @ 1:28 pm
Gutsful-I agree what you say that some people in certain Countries don’t see some things as cruel as what we do.This is because they become desensitized and detached as some don’t know any different.Yet i read somewhere that if these perpertrators are caught with the dogs they get beaten to death by gangs who are out for revenge for the dogs.This maybe one of the reasons why these atrocities are carried out under cover.As much as i detest violence of any sort i can clearly understand why this happens-If you’re cruel to an animal you’ll be cruel to a child.I don’t know what your circumstance was where you stepped in-but i admire you for that.I find any Animal or Child abuse abhorrent-it sickens me to my stomach……TC Louise xx
October 3, 2014 @ 10:42 am
It seems as though most of this persons information came from conversation with agent Adam & not from the contents of any recorded phone call. It is hearsay.
October 3, 2014 @ 1:19 pm
Yes Marcus! Exactly what I was saying earlier. Hearsay! There was nothing at all shocking or new in the reported recording. People are getting too worked up about Rani herself, saying that she must be a fraud because her language is ‘flowery’ and reads like a Mills and Boons novel. That is all totally irrelevant! I personally think all she is doing is describing and writing in her own style what ‘Adam’ said to her. He is the fraud. He is the Spook completely up to his neck in it and trying to cover his back with what is definitely blatant misinformation. I wonder how many other naive young women he has played the recording to? Certainly beats the normal ‘come up for coffee’ chat up line! Rani was probably the only one of them with the bottle to try and report it.
October 3, 2014 @ 7:37 pm
Wasn’t “Hearsay” a manufactured group from the MSM/Cowell stable type show? You guys get the “X-Factor” no’s for your comments from me – everyone is entitled to their opinion. Mine is “arsewipes”. NEXT …
October 3, 2014 @ 10:54 am
Morning to you to Gallows WTF. I live in and am posting from Wales mate. I am not flying round in a jet I know that much. I am not computer savvy at all and am hoping you or Wolfie would know. How can this happen? How can my service provider change as well? Is it from outside hackers? I cant be in all those places at once.
October 3, 2014 @ 11:05 am
I wonder if Rani is one and the same as Sylvie Krin from Private Eye?
I think we should be told. 🙂
Also, I wrote an earlier comment elsewhere to the effect that only terrorists (and no one else) ever seem to live in “compounds” and that we could easily find them, therefore, by asking Estate Agents if anyone has enquired after such a property. Well, here’s a piece of luck then! We can find all the secret agents in the land by applying the self-same method. That is we should ask, “Has anyone sought a ‘glamorous flat’ recently?”. Bingo!
October 3, 2014 @ 11:16 am
Gallows, this is important to me obviously. Could what you are saying mean someone has control of my computer? Is this a glitch? I am using my Kindle to post because my computer has been playing up really badly for months. Sometimes it works, most of the time it just freezes or scrolls up when I want to scroll down, I couldn’t switch it off a few times. Tbh I really have no idea how computers work, luckilly the wife does.
October 3, 2014 @ 1:52 pm
Why hasn’t your wife fixed your computer yet then? I would reinstall the operating system (having backed up any important files first of course).
October 3, 2014 @ 8:12 pm
Blee blah, she isn’t an expert, she can do somethings, but she doesn’t know everything. I wont tell her what you said, because I dont want her arrested for kicking your fking head in lol.
October 3, 2014 @ 9:34 pm
gutsful, this one is Midlands, c/o Tiscali and your latests post is via Ireland thanks to Amazon
October 4, 2014 @ 12:23 am
Disk in, reboot, follow instructions, done. If your computer takes too long to shut down you can usually hold the power button down for a few seconds for a hard shutdown. Failing that, turn a PC off at the plug; hard drives are designed to withstand powercuts by moving the read/write heads away from the disk should this happen.
Thanks for not getting my head beaten in (just yet) 😉
October 4, 2014 @ 12:58 pm
Haha, thanks mate. Dont worry about your head, I think she’s in a good mood today lol.
October 3, 2014 @ 3:21 pm
Sorry for late reply gutsful, kindle would explain some of it, they update through amazon servers automatically.
I doubt your device is under control, don’t panic.
October 3, 2014 @ 9:11 pm
Gallows, no worries about any late replies fella. As long as I get one in a few days no problem. The impression I get of this site is that some of us here are what they used to call (rough men). Rough but decent. The type that are needed to protect the country and the vulnerable among us. Unfortunately the vile ruling scum have always taken advantage and used such men for their own purposes. Now to my main point, you say Kindle would explain some of it. I want to know what would explain the rest of it.
October 3, 2014 @ 9:38 pm
Patience is a virtue, as they say.
To be honest i have no idea, i only mentioned it because your comments were being put in the spam and sometimes people get worked up or accuse us of messing with the comments if its not up as soon as they post it.
You could google it?
October 4, 2014 @ 12:53 pm
Thanks Gallows, I was just concerned I might be mistaken for a troll, because I have seen them being accused of changing their Ip addresses to try to fool you and whatever. So if this post says I’m on Mars, you will know it has to be me lol. Fking Amazon.
October 4, 2014 @ 12:44 am
Even rough, sturdy, old school geezers have shitty-computer problems bro. It would take me a very boring age to tell you about my slow downs, crashes, etc.
Don’t sweat it though, spooks aren’t going to be interested in hacking plugged in computers. The resonance on the national grid is their listening system for most things. They can probably pick up on your hard drives each time something is written or read anyway.
If your bank account hasn’t been emptied already, there’s a strong likelihood no one else is hacking your computer and you’ve just got some fucked up software or hardware in it.
I take it you have anti-virus software and a firewall?
October 3, 2014 @ 1:24 pm
I don’t know when she last updated her blog, but she’s saying that Chris is a bully and either he or people he knows, hacked into her account after pestering her for an interview.
I don’t think she’s worth our time. Her blog doesn’t have many entries on before the Diana one and she writes like a teenager. There’s too many mistakes in her writing and she puts too much emphasise on observations and feelings of the time without seeming to remember important facts, like names, times etc.
x
October 3, 2014 @ 2:10 pm
Chris is worse than a bully – he is (treated as) an extremist.
October 3, 2014 @ 2:07 pm
Absolute rubbish Rani. I don’t buy it one little bit.
October 3, 2014 @ 2:32 pm
An acquaintance of mine in early 1993 was recovering in a London City hospital following a serious work accident- I think it may have been The Royal Free Hospital. He told me that one night that Princess Diana and a small group arrived at his ward unannounced, and without any press entourage in tow and that she spoke briefly to everyone in the ward and in his words “she was very compassionate and down to earth”.
The fact that Diana was a friend of Jill Dando suggests a paedophile cover up motive for her death. What ever she was or wasn’t I don’t think that she was one of them but was a danger to the ruling elite and Royals and had to go. Just wondering Johnny D why you say that Fayed would be complicit in his own son’s death.
October 4, 2014 @ 9:20 am
In her original (now cut) BBC interview she claimed they (the Royals) were not human. Her husband was of course friends with Savile and the others all have bodies in the closet, in more ways than one
October 3, 2014 @ 3:44 pm
________
The broad mass of a nation will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one ~ Adolf Hitler
October 3, 2014 @ 6:07 pm
Hi Calla. I am sorry that you have interpreted what I have said as some sort of religious-type dogma in which I apparently almost demand that people believe in what I say. Nothing could be further from the truth. Perhaps I was wrong to state something that I KNOW to be the truth without giving details of where and from whom I learned this information. NOTHING will ever make me reveal my sources, but in future, to avoid any accusations that I am ‘part of a David Icke type clique’ I will use the words ‘allegedly’ and ‘maybe’ and ‘perhaps’ for that which I know to be fact. I ALWAYS state that people are entitled to their own views and opinions, even when I STRONGLY disagree with what they are saying. And if this is your opinion of me, then I respect that. tc, lorraine.
October 3, 2014 @ 8:08 pm
Hi Raine. I would like to believe that most people come to this site as they rightly believe the vast majority of people are being well and truly f**ked up the arse when it comes to THE truth. Unfortunately, that will never happen as TPTB can “persuade” the majority of the population that all is OK so long as they have “holidays in the sun/latest Apple phone, etc”.
Talking at work today, it actually come into conversation that until c.80s, credit cards didn’t exist. Now the majority of people live off credit (unfortunately, me included as it’s historic – as is child abuse, which gets written off (bastard fuckers) unlike my debt!).
Thing is (at long last, sorry for that!) MOST on this site are aware and will keep on trying to get others to join. It’s hard work but the results are worth it. x
October 3, 2014 @ 8:24 pm
Check out getoutofdebtfree.org
October 3, 2014 @ 9:06 pm
Hi what-a-carry-on, and thank you for the vote of confidence. I must admit that I get days when I am absolutely in despair and wonder just what it will take to ‘awaken’ the vast majority of people who simply refuse to see what is right in front of their eyes. And you are right about the fact that we are becoming a ‘cashless’ society and many of us are living off of our cards. In London you can’t get on a bus now and pay by cash. You have to have a bus pass. But fear not, the fight goes on, and yes I agree with you that the vast majority of people who come to this site seem to be aware of what is truly going on and are not looking to pick arguments over trivial and inconsequential crap. thanks mate, tc, lorraine xx
October 4, 2014 @ 1:18 pm
Hi Raine, please don’t bother with the ‘allegedly’ nonsense . As a matter of course I automatically discount any information on here if it isn’t backed up by sources that I can investigate myself at a later time . I’d hate you to get the wrong impression and think that secondary sources are the extent of my researches.
I DO take exception to the ‘picking argument’ comment. Are we not allowed to question now? What may appear trivial and pedantic to you are in fact very pertinent points for me and to be honest it’s often in the little ‘inconsequential crap ‘ ( as you so succinctly put it ) that the truth can be found. It’s the big lies that are easy to cover up , the minutiae , more difficult. Just ask the McCanns!
No offence mate. TC
October 4, 2014 @ 4:49 pm
Calla
No offence taken. And of course you are right to question everything……..in fact I do it myself! tc, lorraine, x
October 3, 2014 @ 7:37 pm
Jon King, wrote, Diana the Evidence and I recall him being interviewed and he said that he over heard conversations in a pub and they were openly talking about Diana and how she died or was going to die. It was all confirmed to him by listening. He mentioned Henry Paul worked for the French and MI6 and that he was used as a patsy. I used to see her on a few occasions because she used to go to her counsellor in Hampstead and she would drive the Swiss Cottage, Finchley Road route in her Audi. Not a Royalist but she was really pretty, and much more attractive off camera.
October 3, 2014 @ 7:51 pm
I remember reading somewhere, sorry, I can’t recall the source, that GMcChips was the cardiologist in the ambulance. So many opinions/theories… However, this one does make sense to me in a weird way as to why so much “protection” has been exercised?
October 3, 2014 @ 8:46 pm
Soz, forgot to say that mentioning the McFries can lead to serious prosecutions!! The Tits in Tights obviously are on minimum wage (apart from Queen Rani and King Adam), so am not prepared to make references sooo easy. After all, SK-Y watchers are out there and will not hesitate to “cut you off or lead you to a Govt slag heap of Ebolaaaaaaaaaaaa, etc”.
Nite All x
October 3, 2014 @ 8:44 pm
Anyone here any good at scrabble?
See what you can make of a B, a C, a K, two Ls, two Os and and S.
That’s my response to the e-mail Chris received about that ‘phone call.
Here’s another one.
BOSTON BRAKES.
(As already suggested by DogMan [Oct 03, 2014 @ 12:19:13])
Anyone who believes the car was doing 120mph in Paris on a Saturday night should try it in central London.
October 3, 2014 @ 8:59 pm
Hi Chris. Been a while and I hardly ever comment on stuff. It try to read and make “some” kinda sense of things. Firstly…have your other readers read what’s on the blog link now?. ie 9pm Friday 3rd Oct?. I thought if was an april fools when I clicked the link but then realised that what I was reading has only been published today. So if they looked yesterday it woulda been different.
Anyway….You’re rumbled Big guy! lol. Disinfo agent of the highest order! 😉 lol.
Looking forward to reading your full Di article in the fullness of time!
Keep up the good work! Gaz.
October 4, 2014 @ 1:29 am
lol, I just read the link source – Evil, creepy Christopher (the skinhead) and his gang sending ugly penis pictures.
‘I wonder since Christopher has stated on his own site he hacked my account’.
I expect he’d rather be sitting looking at a blank wall in prison than hack into that (probably) virtually non-existent scrap of bullshit (which, considering the latest; sweeping, extremist, anti democracy, terror laws the poor bloke might end up doing soon anyway).
Poor effort, very poor indeed.
October 3, 2014 @ 10:20 pm
“Vehicle ‘accidents’ are used as a way of assassination precisely because they are such a common cause of death. It is easy for the authorities to claim that anyone crying foul play is simply a ‘conspiracy theorist”. – David Shayler, Former MI5 Agent.
Boston Brakes.
Have a look for the witten reports on the Diana incident in certain non-UK newspapers; they even listed the equipment used. The make of the flash gun the sercurity services use etc.
Anyone hear the early reports of a motorcycle pillion passenger dismounting and approaching the crashed Mercedes and turning to his rider and giving the “job done” signal?
October 4, 2014 @ 4:30 pm
There was the Paul Walker dude and the journalist a month before… Both car crashes, both utter bollox…
October 3, 2014 @ 10:27 pm
I have questions about 3 fairly recent news items published by ExaroNews. If anyone can shed some light on them I’d appreciate it.
ExaroNews, Article #1
My question: Have there been any updates on the “nearly 200 charges” to which ExaroNews refers in their article below? Do we know or suspect the identities of the individuals to whom these particular charges relate?
ht tp://www.exaronews.com/articles/5348/scotland-yard-delays-200-charges-over-claims-of-child-sex-abuse
“Police have delayed seeking to press nearly 200 charges as part of their investigation into a paedophile network linked to politicians, Exaro can reveal.”
ExaroNews, Article #2
My question: Do we know the identities (confirmed or suspected) of the “two former Conservative MPs, one an ex-Cabinet minister” AND “a former Labour MP?”
ht tp://www.exaronews.com/articles/5322/dolphin-square-mps-threw-parties-for-sexual-abuse-of-children
“One witness, whom we are calling “Nick”, identified several powerful figures as his alleged abusers at Dolphin Square, including two former Conservative MPs, one an ex-cabinet minister. Nick described how both politicians raped and physically beat him after he was forced to drink alcohol … He identified the same two MPs who raped him at Dolphin Square also sexually abused him at the town house. He also said that a former Labour MP sexually assaulted him at this property”.”
ExaroNews, Article #3
My question: Do we know or suspect the identity of the “ex-cabinet minister” alleged to have raped a 19 year-old student?
ht tp://www.exaronews.com/articles/5262/rapist-ex-cabinet-minister-named-in-tom-watson-s-dpp-letter
“Campaigning MP Tom Watson names the former cabinet minister who allegedly raped a young woman in an explosive letter to the director of public prosecutions.”
My final question: Is Tom Watson MP on the side of the people, or part of the cover-up? What is this MP’s background? Is he being “licenced” by the Establishment as a useful idiot, or a means of allowing “just enough” evidence of criminality to surface, in order to assure the public that it is being “dealt with”?
Or is Tom Watson in fact working directly for associates of the very people he claims to be investigating? Can we take this man’s (apparently genuine) quest for justice at face value???
Thanks
October 3, 2014 @ 10:38 pm
Oh Rani is good…. very good! he/she thinks they have played a blinder there doesn’t he/she..lol, think perhaps we should look a little closer to home for who the author of this shite is and not necessarily the SS although they could be one and the same….. Come on Mossop bring it on…. I suppose you did warn us 😉 respect to you…. 😉
October 3, 2014 @ 11:15 pm
It reads a bit 50 Sheds of Grey type of drivel to me
October 3, 2014 @ 10:52 pm
Some of you may not have seen todays comedy effort by our Rani 😉 . I am posting it here as I really don’t think her blog deserves the hits, and it’s bloody hilarious, Hey FTS what do you think? LOL.
Christopher Creepy Spivey is an EVIL bully!
Well Winston Churchill’s quote ‘A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.’ has never been truer than it has been in my case and what has happened to me.
Christopher Spivey and his gang have decided to attack me. Now Christopher Spivey who I think is very creepy, paranoid, a self-employed disinfo agent who wants to corrupt society and distort their reality by lying about terrorist events and photo-shopping peoples pictures is a dangerous man with a very sophisticated and well organised network of people trying to turn the British public against their government and head of state, the Queen and those next in line, by calling for a violent revolution however its hilarious he doesn’t agree with war elsewhere but only in the UK.
Now Christopher’s website is very confusing, his unbalanced, incoherent ramblings which is not logical to those that have a brain is all part of him corrupting and distorting the mind, he attacks people, has bad language and bad grammar, spreads lies, bullies people like White Dee and families who lost a love one to terrorism like the Rigby Family and now the Lewthwaite Family claiming their children don’t exist or are working with the British Government to carry out false flags, just some of his shocking claims is Samantha Lewthwaite is fake, like Lee Rigby, and is a combination of pictures of Adele and Lily Allen put together, who are both singers, Michael Adebolajo is not in prison and Michael Adebowale is Germaine Lindsay from what I can make out from his site.
May be Christopher thinks since I’m a Muslim girl and probably “oppressed” I will take his abuse but I don’t tolerate that kind of nastiness especially from someone who has a skinhead.
2 days ago as soon as I posted my story I got a message from Christopher and his gang asking if they can interview me as he wanted to write the different conspiracy theories about Princess Diana and mine was very interesting. Now Creepy claims his computers are still “stolen” by the police and his written so much he doesn’t have time to finish his article but what seems apparent to me is that his searching other blogs for stories or people around him are doing it for him as there’s no Di story or his run out of stories and people to target. I emailed back and kindly declined as I didn’t want to appear on his site as a lot of the content was quite worrying to me and I didn’t want to be associated with him. Thats when my email was hacked. Then loads of emails were sent out to his own email as well as others claiming I was been blackmailed, intimidated, recieved threatening phone calls from the police and Secret Service, I was hiding in an abandoned warehouse,I had been gang-raped by secret services and other sick things, I also had no money and am homeless, I’m desperate for his help etc.. There are 2 or 3 emails that was sent with differernt stories but he chose the one he most liked to put on his site. Christopher then claims I stated phone recording of Di was two hours before she died which I never said, and that I’m part of her murder which is libellous and not true because I was under the age of 15 when the Peoples Princess died.
I wonder since Christopher has stated on his own site he hacked my account will he also publish emails I have received calling me JihadiJohns wife and since my husband was out killing haramies, which is a derogatory word to describe non-Muslims and bad Muslims, would I like his non-halal cock in the meantime? He then posted a disgusting penis with the captions “Do I like it up my bum hole”? Which goes along with the vile, unfunny, disturbed pics on his site. Other nasty filthy pictures were also sent, oh and I was asked was I raped by Prince Philip and touched up by the Queen inappropriately as I seem to go along with the Establishment line regarding Princess Diana? Sick I know.
Also when I tried to send all these messages and replies to a friends email address it kept saying Web Page Not Available and to constantly re-sign in and then all emails were deleted.
I’m now contacting the police for my own safety, I have never been so frightened in my life. I don’t know why I have been targeted by this man but I want him to leave me alone.
October 4, 2014 @ 5:51 pm
Hi Lisa-what an absolute waste of Space this woman is-she’s an insult to our intelligence…….TC Louise xx
October 4, 2014 @ 12:48 am
Typing this before I try reading a word because of bad cataract problem . Right there was no Princess Di. because that honour was only because she married big lugs who isnt royal nor the rest of them . You know the reason why because ive given it often enough . The way to change the whole mess this country is in and end All the problems constantly moaned about , which could have been done to win the Scottish referendum , was to expose Elizabeth Mountbatten as a criminal . This is a Stone cold fact , bullet proof and the biggest scandal in the country . There are no royals and all this needs to stop . HM tax taken from everyone is money taken by fraud . I lked the person known as P. Diana but Any article . Any story that wants to be the truth , must state what I said Cheers ,
October 5, 2014 @ 3:35 pm
John, believe it or not, I thought of you during the Scottish referendum. It was because of your previous comments on that stone the queen has under her throne. I was waiting for someone on tv to mention it, but I didn’t see any mention. I was wondering what would happen if there was a yes vote.
October 4, 2014 @ 12:49 am
Sorry if ive fucked up spelling
October 4, 2014 @ 12:52 am
I cant read a word im sorry to say but this knowledge must be added for them who still dont know
October 4, 2014 @ 1:09 am
That car was never
smashed up like that…..neither as John’s friend said was Diana Dead when she exited the limo…….the same thing occurred with the Tavistock Square bus…….more and more bullshit…..
October 4, 2014 @ 1:16 am
Maybe ‘The Wolf’ was involved….. 😉
October 4, 2014 @ 11:19 am
Dunno, but it wasn’t my ugly penis pic!
October 4, 2014 @ 2:54 am
Has anyone else here or who works for this site heard of the term “spoon feeder agent”
You see the way it works is that an agent pulls people in, an audience if you will, with more or less credible material . . . . then they start to muddy the waters and waste your time.
It’s something to look out for after all no one likes being made a fool of eh!?
October 4, 2014 @ 3:50 am
RANI’S BLOG THE FIRST HALF ITS SLAGGING CHRIS OFF BEFORE YOU GET TO THE JACKANORY BRICK WALL . . . OMFG THE SAME AS ANOTHER A FOOL ON THE HILL?. . . .. . . FISHY, SMELLS LIKE IT, . . .OR LUMP IT, SMELLS FISHY AS FUCK TO ME I DO NOT LIKE WHAT MY GUT FEELING IS OR THAT MY TAROT CARDS BACKED THIS REAL SICK FEELING A SENSE OF DREAD, FOREBODING, I HAVE PICKED A CARD FROM THE ‘DOREEN VIRTUE’ Ph.D MESSAGES FROM YOUR ANGELS, TO TRY AND LIGHTEN UP A BIT THE MESSAGE WAS BY OCEANA, “TAKE ACTION,YOU’RE IN TOUCH WITH YOUR TRUTH IN THIS SITUATION,& YOU NEED TO TRUST YOUR GUT & LOVINGLY ASSERT YOURSELF.” ( one of my mottos is trust your gut animal instinct) at the moment i do not know why i feel like this or if it is even related.
October 9, 2014 @ 5:35 pm
Gosh, Golly, five days after i wrote this about this sense of dread feeling it came as no surprise to find out why that Chris has been arrested again, just saying why i trust my intuition.
October 4, 2014 @ 5:05 am
Gosh.
October 4, 2014 @ 5:08 pm
Golly.
October 4, 2014 @ 9:39 pm
Gosh,tosh good golly miss molly sure like to ball,rockin and rollin,etc.
October 4, 2014 @ 5:21 am
What a load of crap, only beaten by ‘her’ Christopher Creepy Spivey is an EVIL bully! article posted on ‘her’ blog. You get the feeling that the person who wrote it is some sort of emotional retard.
October 4, 2014 @ 5:43 am
I have had a thought. Didn’t the mail accuse Chris of rambling?
Mail-
‘ In a rambling post uploaded to his blog on Tuesday, Mr Spivey’…
Rani says
… ‘his unbalanced, incoherent ramblings which is not logical to those ‘..
I am gobsmacked as an old British boyfriend used to say many years ago. Perhaps we now know the reasoning behind the story. I did not go to the site and I think I am going to ignore it entirely. I could not work out why Chris would publish the story in the first place as it was messed up from the beginning and Chris must receive a lot of this type of thing. Setups would come with the territory wouldn’t they? My personal feeling on this latest post is that it was not written by the previous author as the style is different. Pity the disgusting emails were deleted from rani’s computer but I am sure someone could retrieve them for her. Always save before sending I say. Anyway Chris, cheer up. You are – The Leader Of The Pack. I always wanted to be in a gang .
Stay safe and don’t talk to strangers
October 4, 2014 @ 11:22 am
Spot on, Lesley. These two posts by “Rani” are most certainly not written by the same person; they’re as different in composition as chalk ‘n’ cheese. “I was hiding in an abandoned warehouse”. Just like in every spy thriller that we’ve ever seen, then. Personally, I would favour the “disused chemical plant”… far more cinematic. Imagine all those pipes! Why don’t agents/informers-on-the-run ever pitch up in a nice Guest House? Far more comfy and with bathroom facilities too…
“Rani” also seems rather coherent for someone who claims to have been gang-raped…
Just sayin’.
October 4, 2014 @ 9:15 am
Rani ( I believe a Sanskrit Indian name meaning Queen ), has written an article making allegations about Chris- strangely enough she alleges to have reported Mr S. to the Police……..Quelle surprise!!!!!
October 4, 2014 @ 11:19 am
Chris and the team, I havent read its [rani] blog as I wouldn’t waste my time using fartbook/ twatter ect ect ect, so I am going on what the comments on here say.
Chris, take this article off the site, it is taking up valuable space much needed for THE TRUTH which you always write..
Show that thing [rani] and its ilk the contempt they deserve by not giving it credence by being on YOUR site, much love…………. Trish x
October 4, 2014 @ 2:44 pm
I am of the opinion that these idiots should be exposed fully to teach the rest of us their tactics…
That Rani bird has posted her response to this article and she begins by quoting Churchill who was a psychotic sauce fuelled zionist nonce.
You couldn’t make it up!
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooom!!!
October 4, 2014 @ 3:04 pm
Not worth wasting time on people that open a blog on Wednesday (so i’m told) and are in full blown paranoia mode by Friday. Let her scream in her vacuum…
Muslim…ya reckon? NAFC
October 4, 2014 @ 3:10 pm
Hi dogman… apparently Rani is not a muslim name it is sikh. hee hee. hope you are having a fine and dandy day.. x
October 4, 2014 @ 4:24 pm
She quotes Rumi
October 4, 2014 @ 4:39 pm
The name at the bottom of her flowery story is Rani
October 4, 2014 @ 4:29 pm
Oh, so she can’t be jihadi john’s missus then. Is she one of them
salamis haramies. So she doesn’t need halal cock then…just sayin’October 4, 2014 @ 11:53 am
So the day after Chris publishes this he has a blow-out at 80mph on the motorway? Did you examine the tyre Chris? Ask someone who knows what a blown tyre should look like if yours is typical.
Yes, I am paranoid and very worried for Chris’ safety.
Take care Chris. xx
October 5, 2014 @ 3:48 pm
I must have missed the 80 mph bit. It’s probably coincidence, it was a rear tyre, much better to go for a front tyre. That can have the added bonus of ripping the steering wheel right out of your hands in a second. Were the tyres remoulds or part worn?
October 4, 2014 @ 2:54 pm
I noticed that Rani doesn’t have a comments section on her blog. She does have an ASK ME ANYTHING section which i believe is ripe for abuse. I would suggest, however, we put our heads together and come up with a couple of really good questions for her. If they are worded well enough, we could well enter into a dialogue with her which will eventually provide us with definitive proof of her intentions!
how about….
“does she have a copy of the recording?”
If she doesn’t, then she is as mad as a box of squirrels.
October 4, 2014 @ 4:22 pm
Couple of penis pics I quite like on the fidssa (federation of infectious diseases societies of southern africa) website –
1. Case of the Month – September 2011
h ttp://www.fidssa.co.za/E_news_CaseOfTheMonthSept2011.asp
2. Case of the Month – September 2010
h ttp://www.fidssa.co.za/E_news_CaseOfTheMonthSeptember.asp
October 4, 2014 @ 4:36 pm
Hi Louise, hope you are well. Thanks for the support mate. I think that in future I should use words like ‘allegedly’ and ‘rumours’ and ‘maybe’ and ‘perhaps’ even when I know that I am talking about facts!!! And thanks for understanding that it would be unforgivable to put others in danger by revealing sources of info. I signed that link btw concerning the Dog meat trade in Vietnam. Fuckin heartbreaking isn’t it? tc, lorraine, xx
October 4, 2014 @ 5:43 pm
Hi Lorraine-why should you change your vocabulary to suit others? If you’ve no doubt of a subject’s authenticity to be true-then so be it.Doesn’t matter what others think as most people doubt the truth when it’s staring them in the face anyway -That’s why most of the masses are still sleepy.We can all live by assumptions and some are to afraid to let their guard down therefore live in their own bubble.I’ve been in quite a few arguements in the past where i’ve spoken the truth to people and offended some-but tough tit i don’t give a shit.What we must remember is if we doubt others all the time-then can we trust ourselves? It’s a question that very few people answer…..TC Louise xx
October 4, 2014 @ 7:11 pm
Hi Louise. During my research in to satanic abuse and MK-ULTRA I have learnt quite a lot about what is termed as ‘Dissociation.’ I could write a million words on the subject but basically it is when a person is experiencing something so horrific that their minds literally ‘dissociate’ from what is happening to them. In fact many victims of horrendous crimes have spoken of how they somehow ‘dissociated’ themselves from what was happening to them and that is how they got through their ordeal (I have personal experience of this). It is almost as if you are outside of yourself watching someone else go through the horror. This is how kids who are horrifically abused develop MPD (Multiple personality disorder) or Dissociative Identity Disorder as it is now called. I have a theory, and although I can’t back it up by any facts, it is something I often wonder about: Is it possible that the majority of the public KNOW DEEP DOWN that what Chris and the other Alternative Media sites are saying is TRUE, but they find it so terrifying and so horrible to absorb that they have chosen to ‘dissociate’ their minds from it and convince themselves that our entire establishment are not regularly raping and murdering our children? That our babies are not being poisoned by vaccines and that there is no ‘elite’ plan to kill 95% of us? Or is it simply that they REALLY are braindead fuckwits? Anyway mate, always good to talk with you, tc, Lorraine, xx
October 4, 2014 @ 8:09 pm
Hi Lorraine-Yes i know exactly what you mean by this Analysis-that’s why it’s so important in your own sub-conscious you do what you know to be RIGHT.I’d be here all night explaining the inn’s and out’s of child Psychology as it interest’s me especially when there are ways you can gain a child’s trust after trauma and abuse.Usually the filth that gains a child’s trust then traumatise them can be healed with reverse Psychology as one example-which i’m sure you’re aware of.Anyway as i’ve said don’t change just to suit others-that’s exactly what TPTB want us to do-they don’t want us to think for ourselves.I think that some people are not genuine and want to pick other people’s brains.In the past i’ve had good teachers who’ve explained this to me-so if you’re true to yourself things will balance out-bollocks to what other’s think-you’re what i would say a genuine nice person……TC Louise xx
October 4, 2014 @ 9:15 pm
Oh for heaven’s sake, I’m losing the will to live now. So anybody who doesn’t go along with YOUR interpretation of the world is a ‘’braindead fuckwit’’ ( your words) or suffering from ‘dissociation.’’
You really are in danger of alienating a lot of fellow contributors by going down this road. Surely the whole point of a site like this is to encourage diverse opinions on whatever is the current topic and for people to make worthwhile original contributions which hopefully would result in meaningful well researched consensus. More and more often these days I am just reading regurgitated second hand accounts on the lines of …………………..’’I read somewhere that……’’ or worse still huge chunks of Wikipedia cut and pasted. This is NOT original thought and is not unlike cutting and pasting from the Daily Mail to prove a point. I happen to believe a lot of what I read on this site . Much of it IS informed opinion but you know, have you ever considered for one moment that YOU could be the one with comprehension issues?
October 4, 2014 @ 9:41 pm
AS i have said before and this is the last time i’ll say it. There is no such thing as fact only interpretations, unless of course, you were actually involved. State your own opinions by all means, but don’t get into slanging matches with other people just because they have different opinions. There seems to be a deliberate attempt to undermine certain subjects in the AM at the moment. It is the easiest thing in the world to be negative and smug about something that people will have difficulty proving. They may be making assumptions,(false or correct) or they may be protecting whistleblowers, so make your own minds up. As we all know, the justice system is flawed and deeply corrupt throughout most of the world, so verdicts are no guarantee of justice. Spare a thought for victims of sexual and violent abuse, and see if you can’t put your energies to better use other than nit picking, because you aren’t helping anybody at present.
Nobody is to reply to this, just stay on topic and contribute in a positive manner. That isn’t multiple choice, so it’s up to you. A lot of the comments have been repetitive and taken the subject nowhere. Grow up or fuck off!
October 4, 2014 @ 10:03 pm
And NO , YOU didn’t say it. Nietzsche did !
“There are no facts, only interpretations.” – Friedrich Nietzsche
October 4, 2014 @ 10:12 pm
I know Calla, I posted it! Another pointless nitpicking comment.
October 4, 2014 @ 10:51 pm
Hi Louise. Yeah I know a bit about reverse psychology. Actually when I was studying for my criminology degree we had to know a bit about psychology, although I had always been interested in the subject. I know that if a child is rescued at an early enough age, and given loads of love and care, the results can be miraculous and the formerly traumatised psyche of the child can begin to heal. Obviously Louise, as you know, it is vital that the child is rescued from his or her abusive situation as early as possible because the longer the abuse goes on, it is harder to turn the child’s life around in a positive way (although not impossible). Anyway mate, tc, and you are right, I WILL carry on speaking in the language that I am comfortable with and fuck what anyone else thinks lol!!!! speak soon, lorraine xx
October 5, 2014 @ 4:08 pm
Raine, we are all different and have different opinions and different approaches to things. I can see both your point and Calla’s. I myself have many things I would never reveal, because if too much is said, things can be traced back to me and others. My list of what I can’t say is very long, but as we were talking about animal cruelty, you will be glad to know, I and others have helped to put some very nasty and extremely vicious and dangerous people behind bars, and prosecuted. It’s a shame their sentences were pathetic.
October 5, 2014 @ 4:18 pm
Good on you fella. One of the lads I worked with had to be restrained from getting into a scrap in China. I won’t go into details, but it wasn’t surprising. The thing is that some cultures point at us eating animal meat and call us hypocrites. There is unnecessary cruelty involved and that is what I struggle with.
October 5, 2014 @ 4:26 pm
Hi Gutsful, and good for you in your fight on behalf of abused Animals. And honestly mate, I have no grudge against you. We are all here on this site to share knowledge and to enlighten each other, even if it means that sometimes we are unable to be more forthcoming about certain things. As my Irish Grandma used to say, “A person who loves Animals is a feckin good-un in my books!” lol, tc, lorraine xx
October 5, 2014 @ 8:21 pm
Hi Raine, never thought you had a grudge love.If it’s as I suspect, you could be even living among the villains you have received information on. FTS could be the same. Lets face it there are evil people all around us it seems. Just pick a town these days. You take care x
October 4, 2014 @ 4:56 pm
Hiya Dogman, you ok mate? I will absolutely take you and gallows word for it that ‘John’ is a cock, lmao, lorraine xxxx
ps. and two for gallows, xx
October 4, 2014 @ 7:06 pm
Thank you lorraine and yes i can confirm that my source (me) is correct on this occasion. xx
October 4, 2014 @ 9:56 pm
Calla
What exactly is your problem? I was talking to Louise. Although me and Louise have never met we often have on-line discussions that ARE NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU OR ANYONE ELSE. I was Not, repeat NOT referring to YOU SPECIFICALLY AS A BRAINDEAD FUCKWIT. I was talking about people who refuse to see what is going on in the world despite overwhelming evidence in front of their eyes. Calla, I don’t like getting angry with anyone, especially you as I have read all of your posts and I find you to be very intelligent and well-researched, but I am NOT going to carry on a slanging match with you and I will say this ONCE MORE , I am NOT referring to you in my discussions with Louise and I would kindly like you to mind your own business about what I discuss with other people on-line and stop carrying on as if I have a personal vendetta against you. I don’t give a toss whethetr you like me or not…..it is your prerogative. Now please leave me out of whatever it is you have got the bollock about. Thank you. Lorraine
October 4, 2014 @ 10:12 pm
Hear Hear! X
October 4, 2014 @ 11:16 pm
What was it you were saying earlier Ici2? something about trusting that gut instinct and going with it… I got that. You go with that gut instinct too raine 🙂 … xx
October 5, 2014 @ 1:23 am
Hi Lisa, how’s it going mate? And yeah, I am gonna follow my gut instinct, it is usually fairly accurate, tc , speak soon, lorraine xx
October 4, 2014 @ 11:38 pm
Good morning everyone.
I have just read the comments here and and from what I can see there are no new developments. I have noticed dissention in the ranks. I do appreciate people such as Calla questioning information they find on this site. Its healthy and shows the people coming here that they are not willing to be led around by the nose. Perhaps it’s inevitable there will be spirited conversations . I also have great respect for people’s privacy and although the information shared between us cannot always have full disclosure, it is a starting point for further research and part of the puzzle. I expect we all have stories that can not be told fully just yet. I for one have a few which I would never publish here out of respect for Chris. The point is I have a handful of sites I visit and sometimes the best information comes in the comment section. so my advice is to cross reference what you learn even if they cannot elaborate and things do become clearer.
There is no one person who will swoop in and save us, ( Chris has a flat tyre) so we all must keep learning because knowledge is powerful . I am not expecting anyone to say or do anything that would put them in harms way. Perhaps it should be stated that if someone cannot give out information then thats ok and thanks for anything that is contributed. Information is fluid and no one knows the whole picture anyway. This site is in the UK and I am in Oz and someone in Thailand or Tibet would have their own localised idiots to deal with.
Back to the topic , I am assuming nothing more has happened? As I said I will not go to the site and the only info I have is what Chris and Lisa, (who both have my respect) posted. So things are looking up.
Stay safe
October 5, 2014 @ 5:47 am
Very wise words Lesley.
October 9, 2014 @ 11:05 pm
Lisa,As you know your gut instinct will never let you down 🙂
October 5, 2014 @ 5:05 pm
THECRUISER ‘Hearsay is not a very reliable religion………’
Hi THECRUISER. I am guessing that you have heard of ‘circumstantial evidence?’ It is something that is very often used in a court of law and when the United Kingdom had capital punishment on the statute, it was often enough to hang a person. Circumstantial evidence is basically like a number of threads; one thread on its own doesn’t mean much…..but dozens and dozens (or even hundreds) of threads of circumstantial evidence, when placed together, are often enough to convince a jury of a person’s guilt. Just for an example, I would ask how many times would a Man have to be accused of rape or sexual assault before it became obvious to any person with a shred of common sense that there was something in the ‘hearsay?’ A false accusation once is bad luck; two false accusations against an innocent Man is VERY bad luck; but how about TEN accusations? Or twenty? Or fifty? Or even hundreds? Would it not then become apparent that these accusations can no longer be dismissed as ‘hearsay?’ and that there is indeed something ‘not quite right’ about this Man? All I am saying THECRUISER is that you must weigh up the circumstantial evidence and decide on the law of averages, and that is usually where you will find some sort of answer. Jill Dando was murdered, on that we are all agreed. Her fiancee (a Doctor) was given a job afterwards as a royal physician. Her fiancee also ‘forgot’ to mention to the police that he had actually seen her killer. Her co-host on crimewatch admitted that he would ‘like to watch child porn given the chance.’ Dando was friends with Cliff Richard who has himself been arrested in connection with sexual abuse against a minor (but of course we must presume him innocent until proven guilty and all that). Someone, for some reason, wanted Dando out of the way; she was not murdered during the course of a robbery; her murder was not sexually motivated. So what was the reason and why? I don’t know the answer for certain…..but the circumstantial evidence points me and many others in a certain direction….tc, lorraine, xx
October 5, 2014 @ 5:13 pm
Very good post Raine. I could do some serious mischief about the phrase “not a very reliable religion.” Reliable religion being somewhat of an oxymoron!
October 5, 2014 @ 5:30 pm
Hiya Dogman, hope you and yours are okay. And bleedin’ hell, haven’t we had to deal with some oxyMORONS lately? HAHAHAHAHAHA , tc mate, we must have a chat soon, lorraine xxxx
October 5, 2014 @ 5:35 pm
Hi Raine, I sent you a couple of emails, did they reach you? Mentioning religion when demanding proof about Dando. Face palm! Did I mention it is up to people to believe what they choose…hint hint, belief, not proof, or do we have a witness? LMAO
Take care xx
October 5, 2014 @ 5:40 pm
Hi Dogman, I will check my e-mails and get right back to you. lorraine xxxx
October 6, 2014 @ 12:53 am
Dogman, during our earlier exchange it was you who mentioned ‘religion’ in your response to my use of the phrase ‘blind faith’. I think we’re both in agreement on the issue of the reliability of religion per se, so perhaps the *face palm is a bit misplaced.
Also, if you look at my posts here about the Dando issue, none include a ‘demand for proof’, but merely question whether there is anything substantial to corroborate the theory that she was murdered due to her alleged knowledge of a high level paedophile ring. You subsequently posted some links to articles in support of the theory, but as I said previously, they contain mere hearsay. In answer to your question of whether I think the people in those articles are liars, I have to say, that’s simply not the issue; is there sufficient evidence to support the assertion? No, but I hope some appears, as I would like nothing more than for the whole house of cards to collapse…much as they arranged on 9/11.
I’ve always been of the (possibly erroneous) belief, that the AM encouraged the questioning/testing of practically everything we’re fed through all media outlets, including the AM. However, it’s often the case that simply not accepting the explanations provided – particularly here – is sufficient to provoke hostile or dismissive/puerile reactions. In addition you leave yourself open to accusations of being a troll or a purveyor of disinformation.
We’re all fighting the same fight, so it’s easier to achieve success united, whilst continually questioning and searching, rather that divisively sniping at one another unnecessarily.
Apologies to all if this seems a tad long winded.
Keep up the good work.
October 6, 2014 @ 6:53 am
No problems THECRUISER. Fair explanation and the face palm was misplaced. There has been a few people trying to undermine everybody in the AM recently with inane demands for proof of things nobody can provide. What goes thru somebody else’s mind is one of them. I’m not sure about some of the things that go thru mine! You suffered my ire because you can on at the same time as our regular Kirkcaldy troll. Apologies. Dando allegedly knew about the paedos, according to friends and colleagues, but who knows why she was murdered. Glad we agree on religion, lol
October 6, 2014 @ 8:47 am
Cheers DM
October 6, 2014 @ 12:55 am
Thanks Lorrane, I appreciate your explanation x
October 6, 2014 @ 11:55 am
You are welcome THECRUISER, TC, Lorraine, x
October 6, 2014 @ 2:11 am
To those who commented on Diana being seen walking to the ambulance. I happened to be up that night with friends, so we were listening to the ‘live’ reports. One of the interviews of a bystander was a French lady saying she saw a tall blonde woman stepping into the ambulance. The gist was, “It was a tall blonde woman with [dark?] trousers and [light?] top, I can’t say I could identify her as Diana from here, but definitely a tall woman.”. Words to that effect.
At that point our group went our separate ways as she’d clearly wasn’t badly hurt if she walked into the ambulance. I was shocked to hear, the next morning, that she was dead. No one with a torn aorta (the reported injury) is capable of walking minutes after such an injury.
October 6, 2014 @ 12:54 pm
Reading your blog, Chris (and hers). It’s a an obvious play.
Your previous false arrest was based on harassment charges, She is all screamy on her blog as to say how her site as taken over.
It’s a change of tactic, to get you to “harrass,” or anyone who follows what you do to “harrass.”
16 years for her to write a blog about this phone call. I don’t “adam and eve it!” 🙂
October 6, 2014 @ 3:21 pm
I was wondering about this woman? I wont visit her blog, but I was just wondering if her name could be Sharon. Just a thought and probably wrong.
October 6, 2014 @ 3:55 pm
Haha, I know who you are referring to and it’s a possibility, although I think it is somebody else.
October 6, 2014 @ 4:20 pm
Oh, and the Rani story? Not even pretending to be real in my opinion, sorry I was so underwhelmed by this teen story I forgot it was the topic of the page .. As for the hysteria now on her website, it strikes me as lone-nutter-seeking-attention-and-thinks-this-is-fertile-ground territory. Practically saying “chase me”.
October 9, 2014 @ 2:05 am
oh Dog just read this old fanny. ..Bring back the dandy. FS …The boyfriend. worked. for MI5..yeah …lol
October 9, 2014 @ 2:28 am
Did you like it old Bean O , lol , POA , Legal Advisor to Tittsworth & Grabbe and Goodnight.
October 21, 2014 @ 10:57 pm
Hi everyone 🙂 this page proves the whole reason i come to this site. The comments section is just as informative as the research Chris does. Thank you all xxx