No Bodies Business


John Hamer with a foreword by yours truly.


Now as you all doubtlessly know the last two posts that I stuck on here were a couple of old articles of mine that I had written about 9/11 way back in 2013 – although to be fair I did edit them both and added a bit of new detail to boot.

Nevertheless, I am pretty sure that you mostly all assumed that the reason for the re-released, revamped, articles is because I am still under the weather… Which I am as it happens, yet you would be wrong about why I reintroduced the two tarted up articles.

You see, I have actually resumed writing – I am writting the 3rd installment of Princess Diana’s ‘murder’  – although I have only been doing 4-5 hrs a day as I still keep coming over in waves of chronic tiredness and then have to wander off for a little sleep or sit down and look at the tele.

So let me tell you the real reason for the two articles, which came about following a quick chat that I was having with me old mate, the Author & Historian, John Hamer – last thursday I think it was… You see, during the course of this brief conversation I thought  to myself that rather than break off writing about Di’s bollox to get a ‘bit of new’ added to the site, I would ask John if he could let me have some more articles – as he had told me to do when I had finished the last lot that he had given me.

And true to his word, John kindly sent me those articles later on that day – seven to be exact.


PHOTO: John Hamer

However, before I had chance to select one, John sent me another email containing another article of his.

And as it happened this article was in regard to another anomaly about the false flag 9/11 old fanny that he had picked up on… Namely the lack of plane passengers – or to be more precise, the lack of names of those passengers registered dead.

What’s More is that the information was new to me – which is always nice – although I have in the past written about the completely over the top official death total – which has an awful tendency to fluctuate.

Nevertheless, according to Wikipedia at this moment in time:

The September 11 attacks killed 2,996 people and injured more than 6,000 others. These immediate deaths included 265 on the four planes, 2,606 in the World Trade Center and in the surrounding area, and 125 at the Pentagon.

However, whereas I concentrated on those ‘victims ‘ who were already in the Towers, John has concentrated only on those allegedly onboard the four planes supposedly hijacked.

And you can read what I wrote by clicking HERE, but basically it boils down to the Monster, American Government taking the photos of those who really died that day (although not necessarily anywhere near a hijacked plane), made a few slight changes to the ‘victims’ ears and whatnots (see what I did there), added a new background to some  – whilst not even bothering with others – and after doing that 2, 3 or 4 times with each photo; hey presto, they made a few hundred people who really died that day into nigh on 3000.

Course, that sick practice employed by the Monsters-Minions still continues today.

Therefore, with the information being new to me and arriving in the way it did, I am sure that you will agree that the article makes a good first choice from John.

As for the two articles that I re-released? Well whilst looking for the article of mine about the photoshopping, I came across those other two and I thought to myself that it doesn’t hurt to remind people how easy these false flags are to spot.

Sadly some people are so blind that they will never see.

But anyway, on a brighter note  you will also be pleased to learn that John’s new book: “Behind The Curtain” is now available to buy – or I should say John’s new books:“Behind The Curtain Volumes 1 & 2” are available to buy since there is far too much information contained within the pages (Approximately 1150 Combined) to make it practical for just the one.


And according to the blurb on the back:

December 1968 saw a landmark court case in the appropriately named township of Credit River, Minnesota, USA. First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly was an epic courtroom drama and although unsurprisingly, not widely reported either at the time or subsequently, is actually extremely significant.

Jerome Daly a lawyer by profession, defended himself against the bank’s attempted foreclosure on his $14,000 mortgage on the grounds that there was no ‘consideration’ for the loan. ‘Consideration’ in legalese, refers to ‘the item exchanged’ and is an essential element of any legal contract. Daly contended that the bank offered ‘no consideration’ for his loan on the grounds that they had ‘created the money out of thin air’ by bookkeeping entry and had therefore not suffered a loss (another relevant point of law) by his refusal or inability to pay back the money.

The proceedings were recorded by Justice William Drexler, who had given no credence whatsoever to the defence, until Mr. Morgan, the bank’s president, took to the witness stand. To Drexler’s and indeed everyone else present’s great surprise, Morgan casually admitted under questioning from Daly’s lawyer, that the bank routinely ‘created money out of thin air’ for all its loans and mortgages and that this indeed was standard practice in all banks. Presiding Justice, Martin Mahoney declared that, “It sounds exactly like fraud to me,” accompanied by nods and murmurs of assent from all around the courtroom.

In his summation of the case, Justice Mahoney reported that… “Plaintiff (the bank) admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful ‘consideration’ must exist and be tendered to support the Note.”

So, the court duly rejected the bank’s claim for foreclosure and the defendant kept his house. The implications of this case therefore, should have been far-reaching. If bankers are indeed extending credit without consideration (which they most definitely are) i.e. without backing their loans with real money they actually have stored in their vaults and were entitled to lend, any judicial decision declaring their loans void, would topple the entire worldwide financial and banking system.

Since this precedent, many other defendants have attempted to have mortgages and loans nullified using the same defence as Daly, but there has been extremely limited success only. In fact, one judge said, strictly ‘off the record,’ “If I let you do that, you and everyone else, it would bring the whole banking system down. I cannot let you go behind the bar of the bank. . . . We are not going behind that curtain!”

Well suffice to say, we certainly are going on a highly revealing trip ‘ behind the curtain!,’ so strap-in and be prepared for the ride of your life, as we investigate the sordid and murky history of the world of banking and high finance and the people who run it… with an iron fist encased in a velvet glove.

This book is an indictment, not just of the totally corrupt financial system that today permeates the whole world, but also of the people that control it. Their crimes against humanity are legion and so far-reaching that their insidious influence now extends into and corrupts virtually every element of society and it is these so-called ‘banksters’ – banker-gangsters, who are responsible for all the death, destruction and misery in the world today

I look forward to reading them both.

You can purchase the books along with John’s other ones by clicking HERE.

And that just leaves John’s excellent article for you to read – to which I have taken the liberty of adding some photographs.

Thats it, Mustache… Byyeeeeeeeeeeeeee

John Hamer’s: More 9/11 Anomalies

Ellen Mariani lost her husband Louis on Flight 175 that crashed into the South Tower on 9/11. With the help of a lawyer named Phil Berg, she filed a lawsuit against Bush and co. under the RICO act. Also, she refused to take the hush money that was offered to her under the 9/11 Victims Compensation fund, one condition of which stipulated that there could be no public condemnation of the official story.

Ellen and Phil Berg appeared as guests on an internet radio show in 2004 and during this broadcast; Ellen said that incredibly, she was apparently the only relative out of all the passengers that ‘died’ on Flight 175 (the one that crashed into the South Tower.) Period. Her lawyer, Phil Berg, confirmed this statement.


PHOTO: Ellen Mariani and her late husband

At first I could not believe what she was saying. However, it then dawned on me that not only had the US government lied about the physics of 9/11; they may very well have taken it one step further by faking the number of people that died that day. Hardly anything about 9/11 made any sense so why should this be any exception?

Ellen and Phil at first believed that for some reason the government was simply holding back the names of the relatives of people that had died on Flight 175. She tried in vain to contact the relatives of other family members, but to no avail. Of course, after the event, she and her lawyer believed, just like most other people, that four jets had been hijacked by Arab terrorists and crashed into buildings and into the ground at Shanksville.


PHOTO: Flight 175 (allegedly)

Their interview also gave credence to the initially aired but soon deleted Fox News report that said that the jet which crashed into the South Tower had no windows. The jet also appeared to have a ‘pod’ underneath its fuselage also. This piece was never aired again – as with many other incriminating (to the official story) first reports that were broadcast that day.

Then … being a professional researcher I decided to investigate a little further using the American Social Security Death Index, (SSDI) and also the September 11th Victim’s Compensation Fund. After all, it is quite easy to say that the flight lists are not genuine, but where is the proof?

The Social Security Death Index (SSDI) is a privately-owned website that is not officially affiliated with US Social Security but nevertheless it claims an accuracy rate of about 83%. Anyway, to check its reliability, I inputted the names of 20 people kindly supplied to me by an American colleague that had died in his family over the years, along with some friends and even a neighbour of his. Interestingly, with the exception of one person, I found everyone I was looking for, thus demonstrating a 95% accuracy rating in this example.

And then I decided to take a closer look at the 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund (also more commonly known as the ‘Shut Up and Take the Money’ Fund)

After the event, the US government generously opened up its wallet and gave family members of those who lost their lives that day, lots of money in return for which, these families were basically told to keep quiet about anything concerning 9/11. Considering all the lies surrounding this horrific event, this is unsurprising.

However, at this point there is something important to consider, and that is the power of human greed. Please remember this concept as you read on…

Bearing in mind that the names of all the ‘official’ victims can be found in many websites, here are the results of my research at that time:

Flight 11:

Of the 92 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 20 are listed in the SSDI (22%). Of these 20 people, only 3 (three) are on the 9/11 Compensation Fund list:

Judy Larocque

Laurie Neira

Candace Lee Williams

Flight 77:

Of the 64 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 14 are listed in the SSDI (22%). Of these 64 people, only 5 (five) are on the 9/11 Compensation Fund list:

William Caswell

Eddie Dillard

Ian Gray

John Sammartino

Leonard Taylor

Flight 175:

Of the 65 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 18 are listed in the SSDI (28%). Of these 65 people, only 3 (three) are on the 9/11 Compensation Fund list:

Michael C. Tarrou

Gloria Debarrera

Timothy Ward

Flight 93:

Of the 45 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 6 are listed in the SSDI (13%). Of these 45 people, none are on the 9/11 Compensation Fund list:

No-one. Not a single one.

So, of the passengers and crew of Flight 11, 77, 175 & 93, only 22%, 22%, 28%, 13% respectively are in the SSDI.

And of the 266 people that we were told died on these jets, only 11 relatives applied for compensation. Can you believe that not a single relative from Flight 93 applied for compensation? I certainly cannot. Were all the relatives of the victims so rich that they were ineligible to receive compensation? No, that cannot be correct. The minimum award was $250,000 regardless, and the average pay-out was about $1.8 million. (The recipients only had to agree that they could not sue the airlines or talk publicly about 9/11.)

Most lawyers told their clients to take the money and run (which is what most lawyers would do – take the guaranteed money). Ellen Mariani clearly elaborated on this point during her appearance on the radio show mentioned above.

Oddly, but consistent with many other anomalies of 9/11, the complete list of the people who benefitted has been omitted from the actual 9/11 compensation fund report. Despite this, it does contain an interesting statement… According to the report, 98% of all the people who suffered a loss on 9/11 took the fund money. The average payment was $1.8 million.

Then there is the case of Beverley Eckert who many believe was murdered by Zionist operatives who were threatened by her relentless pursuit for justice regarding the death of her husband, Sean Rooney, whom she had loved dearly.


PHOTO: Beverly Eckert (white coat)

Rooney had died a terrible, heart-rending death as WTC-2 collapsed around him and it was a truly horrendous event. Beverly was actually speaking on the phone with Sean, who was trapped in the building, and while she was speaking to him, saying a tearful goodbye, he died in the collapse. In her own words, she said:

“I guess I wish I wasn’t here, because it was such a different life before September 11th. I never envisioned myself speaking to the public having to say anything other than about my own little life. I was just like everyone else, very complacent, very content. World events didn’t seem to affect me, that’s what I believed at the time.

“All that changed on September 11th, and I guess I just found that I couldn’t just sit back and be a victim. I hate that word. I guess we’re always called victims’ families and things like that. I hate that term, what it conveys is helplessness and no control. I think it’s just been part of my healing process to see if I can make something good happen out of all this.

“My husband Sean worked in the South Tower, his office was on the 98th floor with a couple of hundred other people and he didn’t really have a good understanding of evacuation and escape options and so they went up, only to find that the doors were locked. They had a window of opportunity to escape down Staircase A, there were three staircases in the South Tower. I think they thought that the rooftop was an option, and so they went up and they were trapped because the roof doors were locked.

“And I heard from him, he called me and was able to get through to me so I was one of the very lucky family members, I was able to say goodbye. I know what happened to him, I know what his last moments were like. He was very brave. He was a hero. So I have a legacy that I have, that I thought just to take his strength and try to do something positive with it. He was a really strong individual his whole life and I’m kind of feeling infused with that now. I’m trying to make a difference. I’m trying to find the truth in all this chaos.”

“My Silence Cannot Be Bought” Beverly Eckert, Friday, 19th December 2003

Beverly had also issued this statement:

“I’ve chosen to go to court rather than accept a payoff from the 9/11 victims compensation fund. Instead, I want to know what went so wrong with our intelligence and security systems that a band of religious fanatics was able to turn four US passenger jets into an enemy force, attack our cities and kill 3,000 civilians with terrifying ease.

“I want to know why two 110-story skyscrapers collapsed in less than two hours and why escape and rescue options were so limited. I am suing because unlike other investigative avenues, including congressional hearings and the 9/11 commission, my lawsuit requires all testimony be given under oath and fully uses powers to compel evidence.

“The victims fund was not created in a spirit of compassion. Rather, it was a tacit acknowledgement by Congress that it tampered with our civil justice system in an unprecedented way.

“Lawmakers capped the liability of the airlines at the behest of lobbyists who descended on Washington while the September 11 fires still smouldered. And this liability cap protects not just the airlines, but also World Trade Center builders, safety engineers and other defendants.

“The caps on liability have consequences for those who want to sue to shed light on the mistakes of 9/11. It means the playing field is tilted steeply in favour of those who need to be held accountable. With the financial consequences other than insurance proceeds removed, there is no incentive for those whose negligence contributed to the death toll to acknowledge their failings or implement reforms.

“They can afford to deny culpability and play a waiting game. By suing, I’ve forfeited the ‘$1.8 million average award’ for a death claim I could have collected under the fund.

“Nor do I have any illusions about winning money in my suit. What I do know is I owe it to my husband, whose death I believe could have been avoided, to see that all of those responsible are held accountable. If we don’t get answers to what went wrong, there will be a next time. And instead of 3,000 dead, it will be 10,000. What will Congress do then?

Eckert was one of the few surviving relatives who refused to accept the ‘hush money’ offered by Kenneth Feinberg and took her own action, ultimately leading to the White House and beyond.

She sought only justice for her husband and in so-doing publicly referred to the Zionist-orchestrated Project for the New American Century, as the “most sinister” of all documents she had ever seen.

PHOTO: Ken Feinberg

Eckert had gathered evidence that former President Bush knew all about the attacks in advance and had even contributed to the planning of them. Because of her relentless activism she was ‘allowed’ to meet with Barack Obama, informing him that she would not rest until justice was served, and also demanded that George Bush be investigated for conspiracy and complicity in mass-murder.

Less than a week later, Beverly Eckert was dead.

She had met with Obama in 2009 at the White House asking him to open a new 9/11 investigation. Obama shook her hand on TV, making huge political capital out of the meeting and then gave her ‘complimentary’ flight tickets to Buffalo to celebrate her late husband’s 58th birthday anniversary.

Just 6 days later, the plane crashed in suspicious circumstances and Beverly Eckert was silenced forever.

The crash of Continental Express flight 3407 brought tragedy to the friends and family of all 50 victims, but for one family, grief struck for a second time. The plane was flying without cause for concern, but then it suddenly began pitching wildly and crashed. The slick media ‘experts’ claimed it was due to ice, yet the plane had powerful de-icing systems.

PHOTO: Eckert meets Obama

Also suspiciously, there was a strong FBI presence at the crash scene. The FBI only investigates cases where the NTSB has determined that ‘foul play’ is involved. They stated that criminal action was ruled out, yet their presence proved otherwise. This suggests that they knew there was foul play and that their only purpose at the scene was to enact a cover-up operation.

The forensics team was led by the same man who led the forensics recovery efforts for Flight 93 in Shanksville. This man was a FEMA operative who had also worked with the UN on the crash of Egyptian Airlines 990 (another black-op.) Was he considered a ‘safe pair of hands,’ for dealing with these incidents?

Of course all the many, many inconsistencies in the official story would need a book to do them justice and not just a brief article on individual aspects of it all.