More Meghan Markle

Christopher Spivey

Quite obviously it is a great disappointment to me that the vast majority of the world are unable to see through the charade of the latest ‘royal’ wedding.

But then again, I long ago gave up any hope for the human race.

Course, my frustration is made all the worse by the fact that the half-witted copy-writers in the press continually rub the fact that a fraud has taken place in our faces.

For instance, Prick Henry and Renault Meghan have now become the Duck & Duckess of Sussex… The first couple awarded that tit-le since 1843.

Yet have a read of what The Chimp says about that Duck & Duckess prior to the ‘newly weds’:

Now you really couldn’t make it up! A ginger haired twat marrying a totally unsuitable older woman… Dog give me strength.

Yet people fall for the apparent coincidence hook line and sinker.

And then there was this story:

A British-based designer who claimed Meghan Markle’s wedding gown was ‘identical’ to one of her own creations has had her Twitter account mysteriously suspended. 

New Zealander Emilia Wickstead, a favourite of the Duchess of Cambridge, last week commented that the new Duchess of Sussex‘s stunning wedding dress was very similar to a £7,000 gown in her own collection – and sparked a backlash on social media.  

Meghan’s dress was actually created by Givenchy’s Clare Wright Keller, costing £200,000, and kept firmly under wraps until the big day. 

New Zealand designer Emilia Wickstead, a favourite with the Duchess of Cambridge, caused a media stir last week when she said Meghan Markle’s bridal gown had been ‘identical’ to one she had designed

The Twitter social media account of the designer @emiliawickstead has been suspended

Comparison: Meghan Markle in her £200,000 Givenchy dress (left) and designer Emilia Wickstead’s £7,000 gown (right)

Ms Wickstead triggered the storm after she reportedly said: ‘Her dress is identical to one of our dresses. Apparently a lot of commentators were saying, ‘It’s an Emilia Wickstead dress.”

She continued: ‘Her dress is identical to one of our dresses. Apparently a lot of commentators were saying, “It’s an Emilia Wickstead dress.'”

The designer then went on to have a bit of a dig at Meghan’s look. She said: ‘If you choose a simple design the fit should be perfect. Her wedding dress was quite loose.’

And she didn’t approve of the bride’s relaxed hair style: ‘I was like, ‘Hold the wisps [of her hair] back — it’s a Royal Wedding for God’s sake.’

Emilia Wickstead, who claims Meghan’s wedding dress is identical to one of her dresses

The comments have seen Wickstead, who has seen her designs worn frequently by the Duchess of Cambridge, chastised by social media users.

@megananomous wrote: ‘#EmiliaWickstead has a lot of nerve talking rudely about the #DuchessOfSussex’s wedding dress! Emilia actually works as a designer for the royal family!! Highly unprofessional!’ 

@kmcghee617b added: ‘Emilia Wickstead is a very successful designer. She has dressed the Duchess of Cambridge on more than one occasion. It’s a shame that she has elected this forum to voice her complaints concerning the dress origin. Why wouldn’t she have went straight to Givenchy?’

@MeadhbhMcGrath added: ‘Deeply unprofessional comments from Emilia Wickstead on Meghan’s Givenchy gown! Will Kate Middleton sever ties with one of her favourite designers over this?’ 

@pookiesmith2424 added: ‘Emilia Wickstead May just have lost her Royal customers!’ Source

So what, you say.

Read on, says I… But do take note of how bitchy the Monkey Kuntz allege Wickstead to have been.

Now, the next day, the Chimp followed that article up with this next one:

Designer Emilia Wickstead has backtracked on her claim that Meghan’s £200,000 Givenchy gown looked ‘identical’ to one of her own designs.

In a statement, the New Zealand-born designer said she does ‘not think that her wedding dress was a copy of any of our designs’, adding that she has the ‘greatest respect for Clare Waight Keller’. 

Emilia, 34, described the Duchess of Sussex as looking ‘absolutely beautiful’ on her wedding day and said she has the ‘utmost admiration and respect for her’.

It comes after she the designer previously suggested to the Mail that Meghan’s wedding gown was ‘identical to one of our dresses’.

Designer Emilia Wickstead has backtracked on her claim that Meghan’s £200,000 Givenchy gown looked ‘identical’ to one of her own designs 

In the statement shared on Instagram, Emilia said: ‘I am extremely saddened by commentary that has appeared in the press and on-line over the past few days.

‘Her Royal Highness, the Duchess of Sussex looked absolutely beautiful on her wedding day and I have the utmost admiration and respect for her.

Changed her fucking tune a bit but carry on:

‘I do not think that her wedding dress was a copy of any of our designs. I have the greatest respect for Clare Waight Keller and the House of Givenchy — a huge source of inspiration to me.’

She added: ‘ I wish Their Royal Highnesses, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex a wonderful, happy and love filled life together.’ 

Emilia is one of the Duchess of Cambridge’s favourite designers, and was worn by Meghan on Anzac Day in April. 

HUH??? What the fuck does that mean?

But following the wedding, she remarked on the similarity between Meghan’s stunning Givenchy gown and one of her own off-shoulder designs.

She told the Mail: ‘Her dress is identical to one of our dresses. Apparently a lot of commentators were saying, “It’s an Emilia Wickstead dress.”’

Emilia added: ‘If you choose a simple design the fit should be perfect. Her wedding dress was quite loose.’  Source

Now, apart from the blatant covert advertising used in the two articles, that was their content in its entirety. And apart from that strangely worded sentence in the latter stages of the second article, there appears to be no connection between Meghan and Wickstead, despite the much repeated claims that the ‘dress designer’ is a favourite of Kate Gold-Digger-Smiff… Another created persona.

Yet if you have read my brilliant, ground-breaking, gob-smacking exposé “Who Is Meghan Markle” you will know that there is a strong connection between the two created personas – Markle & Wickstead… You see, Wickstead has been used in the past to legitimize Markle’s [fake] life.

Here, let me show you. Markle is friends with the pint-sized actor, Tom Hollander… Have you noticed how tiny most of these celebrities are?

PHOTO: Markle & Hollander.

Thomas Hollander is friends with Mental Meghan’s step Mother-In-Law, Gorilla Parker Horseface:

PHOTO: Tom ‘thumb’ Hollander with Gorilla Parker-Horseface 

Gorilla also plays the part of Mary Berry:

tumblr_nbcevibt0h1rkeh8to8_500

PHOTO: Mary Berry

But why would Gorilla play Mary I hear you ask, to which I would answer that question with a question: Have you seen how much Mary Berry earns and the Millions of Pounds generated by the shite cooking show… They are actors and acting is what they do.

Here look at these comparisons of Berry and Parker Horseface:

PHOTO: Gorilla & Berry comparison

Gorilla has a son called Thomas… Who is A FOOD critic and obviously knows Mary Berry:

PHOTO: Friends… Or family?

Mary Berry also has a son:

PHOTO: Mary Berry wearing a crown, pictured with her family.

I rather suspect that the crown was added by the press as a clue.

Moreover, Berry’s husband looks very much like William Legge-Bourke… A friend of Prick Charles who is married to Gorilla Parker Horseface:

William Legge-Bourke is the father of Tiggy – Nanny to Prick Henry… See how it all connects?

Moreover, Berry’s boy is the double of Markle’s friend Tom Hollander:

PHOTO: Hollander/Berry Comparison

Tom Hollander is also the name of a fella who looks suspiciously like Mental Meghan’s brother TOM Markle:

PHOTO: Tom Hollander, Linkedin profile picture

Now what would the odds of that be?

Shall we go compare? Of course we fucking shall.

Fuck me, I should be a millionaire instead of living hand to mouth like I do.

The actor Tom Hollander is a clone of the actor Gregory Harrison:

PHOTO: Hollander-Harrison comparison

Harrison was the actor who played the part of the [fake] psycho killer, Ted Bundy:

PHOTO: Dead Ted

Shall we go compare?

Of course we fucking shall:

And I’m not even going to bother touching the two halves in, they match up that well.

Shall we have another bash to make sure that wasn’t just a fluke?

Of course we fucking shall.

And that should mean that the clone-actor Hollander should also look exactly like Ted Bundy, shouldn’t it?

Of course it fucking should:

PHOTO: Ted-Tom comparison

And here is the thing, Tom Thumb is a friend of the [pretend] dress designer Emelia Wickstead:

PHOTO: Wickstead & Dickhead

I keep telling you that everything has to connect to everything for these Satanic Monsters and fuck me, you will believe me one day I can promise you that… Whether I will still be around by then remains to be seen.

Nevertheless, because Wickstead is as fake as the rest, ALL, I say ALL of her photos are fake. Take the photo that is in the dress-rip-off-article for instance:

I mean the photo looks okay at first glance, but look what happens when you blow it up:

Have you ever met anyone with teeth like that?

No, me neither. Yet blow it up even more and you find that the pixels are at total odds with each other.

And like I say, it is all of Wickstead’s photos which are photoshopped, not just the odd one or two.

Moreover, to me she looks very much like Tom Markle’s bird, Darlene Blout – once you get past the photoshopped gob:

PHOTO: Wickstead & Blout photo comparison.

Again, many of you will ask why… And the answer is just the same as before. The money generated is in the millions and made up people need made up people to give them credibility.

Yet the more credibility that the press try to give to the likes of Markle – nearly 37 yrs old, no kids yet – the more fake she becomes to those capable of thinking for themselves.

That’s it. Don’t forget to contribute to this months site fees due on the 9th of June… Byyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.