Sep 14 2013
The Daily Mail
It is truly alarming the way that Hollywood A-listers have come out in support of the vile, sick and totally warped film director Roman Polanski.
Course, Hollywood is paedophiles paradise which you can easily imagine is filled with sleazy, short arsed, sweaty, bog eyed men in ill fitting suits, but not so easy when it comes down to the stars themselves.
Stars like Tom Cruise and Rob Lowe could have practically any woman on the planet yet rumours and allegations about their penchant for little girls are too frequent to ignore.
But when you get the female of the species coming out in support for the fuck up Polanski, you know that Hollywood is insidious from the bottom up.
Females like the vile Whoopi Goldberg should be hung drawn and quartered. How the fuck can she say that Polanski’s rape of a 13 year old girl is not rape, rape:
Whoopi Goldberg is facing a fierce backlash after saying that film director Roman Polanski didn’t commit “rape-rape” when he had unlawful sex with a 13-year-old girl. Source
Polanski was of course the husband of the actress Sharon Tate who was murdered by the Satanic Charlie Manson followers. This is what I wrote about the sick cunt Polanski in my article Celebrity Paedophiles:
Polanski, was also the husband of Sharon Tate who at 8 months pregnant was stabbed to death along with her unborn baby, in the couples Beverly Hills home by the Charles Manson ‘Family’.
No doubt that had Polanski not been away when the murder happened, he too would have been murdered. What a pity the vile creature wasn’t at home, because Polanski is a well documented prolific Paedophile.
The following is taken from an article written by the author Judith Reisman:
In gay Paree, Roman was an open pedophile, posing with bevies of little teenyboppers for photo journal essays. His “relationship” with 15-year-old Natassja Kinski was well-known. She became Tess in his 1979 film Roman got to direct, and shoot her (Tess) being raped.
Ah, the thrill of fine art.
Charlotte Lewis, a British actress, recently accused Polanski of raping her when she was 16. He “forced himself upon me in his apartment in Paris,” she said. “And I have lived with the effects of his behaviour ever since it occurred.”
The New York Daily News quoted Lewis as saying Polanski told her he slept with all of his actresses. “He just said very coldly, ‘If you’re not a big enough girl to have sex with me, you’re not big enough to do the screen test. I must sleep with every actress that I work with; that’s how I get to know them, how I mould them.’”
For any who missed why Polanski was incarcerated in Switzerland, in 1977 he drugged, brutally raped, and sodomized a 13-year-old child in the USA. He never expected to be arrested for what was apparently his common behaviour, but arrested he was. He confessed but fled to France to film happily ever after. He was arrested in Switzerland under a USA warrant as a fugitive.
There is so much more that could be said about Polanski, but I think you get the general idea. Yet once again, Tinsel town comes out in support of one of their own. Worse still, a lot of those coming out in support of Polanski are women, with the likes of Whoopi Goldberg quoted as saying that he wasn’t guilty of “rape – rape”. Madness, utter madness.
Course if I ever needed back up for my article entitled ‘Why the justice system favours paedophiles’ I need look no further than an article written in 2009 by the Observer Newspaper’s Nick Cohen. The article written about Polanski was entitled ‘Why Roman Polanski just loves the English courts’ and was in regard to the Film Directors libel victory in a British Court. Or, as Cohen so neatly put it:
“Only in Blighty could a fugitive paedophile sue a magazine for calling him a groper – and win.”
Moreover, Polanski then had the brass balls to crow about the victory, with Cohen quoting him as saying:
“If I was a murderer the press and police wouldn’t be so obsessed by me. But… fucking, you see, and the young girls. Judges want to fuck young girls. Juries want to fuck young girls – everyone wants to fuck young girls!” See More
And yet, it would seem that even the MSM are trying to excuse the horrible Hobbit.
To me, the article below conveys the message that; its okay to rape little girls, there are no long term effects and they even go on to have a bond with their abuser.
You know, a bit like the way that Harriet Harmen says that children taking part in child porn is okay as long as they aren’t hurt.
As for Jack Nicholson! Well lets just say that I have long suspected the fat cunt of being a nonce.
Hooray for Hollywood? Fuck off.
‘I’m still in touch with Polanski’, says victim who was just 13 when she was ‘raped’ by the film director in Jack Nicholson’s jacuzzi
- Polanski expressed concerns at a rumour that the title of the French version of the memior she will publish next week would mentinon the word ‘rape’
- Now she regards him as an ally because it ‘makes sense to be on the same side’
- Despite the horrific events, Ms Geimer says what followed was worse than the actual ‘rape’
PUBLISHED: 02:17, 14 September 2013 | UPDATED: 02:17, 14 September 2013
Nearly 40 years after she accused film-maker Roman Polanski of raping her in the jaccuzzi at Jack Nicholson’s house, Samantha Geimer has revealed the pair are still in touch.
Polanski, who was 44 at the time, fled the the US the day before he was due to be sentenced in 1977 and has been exiled ever since.
Over the past few years Ms Geimer, who was just 13, and Polanski have written to each other by email.
In one of the emails to Ms Geimer, Polanski expressed concerns at a rumour that the title of the French version of the memior she will publish next week would mentinon the word ‘rape’.
She replied, assuring him that it would not.
The scandal shocked highfliers in the film world and destroyed Polanski’s career in Hollywood. It turned him into one of the country’s most high profile fugitives.
Now she regards him as an ally, according to The Times newspaper in London.
She tells the paper: ‘People are still coming after both of us. We’re both still being treated unfairly. It makes sense to be on the same side.’
She adds that both of them have been abused by the media and the US justice system.
Ms Geimer talks in detail about the ‘attack’. She was picked up by Polanski in his hired Mercedes and driven to Nicholson’s house for a magazine shoot. He wanted to take pictures of her.
The story has been written many times since the day in 1977, but Ms Geimer goes on to say POlanski, now a father of two, gave her ‘four or five’ glasses of champagne and part of a sleeping pill before the shoot.
He told her to strip and she claimed he had sex with her, and sodomised her despite her protests.
Polanski, however, has said the sex was consensual.
Despite the horrific events, Ms Geimer says what followed was worse than the actual ‘rape’.
‘If I had to choose between reliving the rape or [that testimony], I would choose the rape,’ she says.
Now she considers Polanski a victim as well because of the judge’s collusion with the media. The late Judge Laurence J. Rittenband, she claims, told newspaper reporters what sentence Polanski should face.
He was not convicted of rape, but had pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor.
But it was when Rittenband reneged on his promise that Polanski should serve no more than 90 days psychological evaluation in a California prison, because he feared a backlash, that Polanski fled.
The director wrote a letter of apology to Ms Geimer in 2009.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420509/Im-touch-Polanski-says-victim-just-13-raped-film-director-Jack-Nicholsons-jacuzzi.html#ixzz2esb5gc7Z
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook