Hang-Cock & Bull

image_pdfimage_print

Spiv & The Guardian

 

Portsmouth South MP Mike Hancock has been in the news of late, and as you would expect, for all the wrong reasons obviously.

Now, my more astute readers will know that I first mentioned Hang-cock in an article that I wrote about Nick ‘the lot’ Clegg entitled To Cut A Long Story Short.

However, after I wrote that article I was contacted by one of his constituents who enlightened me further on the Sniffenpissen.

And, based on what I was told and pending further information, it would appear that Mike Hancock is indeed a proper Cock.

Now I should tell you that I have an ulterior motive for writing this article which I will reveal in due course.

However, before I do so let me tell you a bit about this cunt, who I understand is very quick to sue… Go for it Mr Cock.

You see, the Sniffenpissin MP was cleared in November 2013 of allegation relating to claims of sexual assault committed against a female constituent of his.

Or perhaps I should clarify that. 

You see, the MP wasn’t cleared of the allegations, it was more a case of the Hampshire Police Cuntstabulary deciding to take no further action:

A Hampshire Police statement said it had discussed the case with the Crown Prosecution Service and would not be taking any further action.  Source

Now personally, although I am not surprised at the decision since that appears to be the norm where MP’s are involved, I find it quite appalling given the facts of the case, the evidence and Hangcock’s track record.

The victim – who suffers from a mental health disorder and had been sexually abused as a child – had first approached Hang-cock in 2009 after having trouble with noisy neighbours.

Hancock, who was elected as a Lib Dem MP, and later resigned the party’s parliamentary whip following a meeting with Nick Clegg – two fucking years after the allegations were first made, I hasten to add – yet remains an MP & a Lib Dem councillor for Portsmouth council, was then arrested in 2010 on suspicion of sexual assault.

Predictably however, he was not charged with any offence… I should also tell you at this juncture, that I have been informed the Sniffenpissin Monster is very well protected.

Then again, aren’t they all?

Never the less, after Mick the Dick was cleared in 2010, his victim bravely, and quite rightly refused to let her claim just be dropped thus allowing yet another Politician – in a long fucking line of Politicians – get away with wrong doing scot free.

The term ‘Scot Free’ should in fact have been coined specifically for the Lib Dems after the former Liberal Party leader Jeremy Thorpe was sensationally cleared – despite the evidence pointing to his guilt –  of conspiring to murder his ex-boyfriend, the Male Model Norman Scott in 1979.

The following is from Wikipedia:

His political career was severely damaged when an acquaintance, Norman Scott, claimed to have had a love affair with Thorpe in the early 1960s, at a time when homosexual acts were illegal in Britain. The scandal forced Thorpe to resign as Liberal Party leader in 1976. He denied the claims of a homosexual affair and was charged with conspiring to murder Scott, though he was acquitted of these charges in 1979, shortly after losing his seat in the general election.

Former Liberal leader Jeremy Thorpe leaves a Service of Thanksgiving for former Labour Chancellor Lord Jenkins  at Westminster Abbey in central London, Thursday March 27, 2003. Lord Jenkins, who died at his Oxfordshire home in January, aged 82, was also Chancellor of Oxford University and a founding member of the SDP. He had been dubbed 'the grandfather of New Labour' and was a friend and mentor to Prime Minister Tony Blair. See PA story MEMORIAL Jenkins. PA Photo : Johnny Green.

Pictured: Jeremy Thorpe

I do in fact remember the case very well being as a young teenager I was horrified to learn that Scott had told in evidence about how he used to “bite the pillow” whilst Thorpe fucked him.

After all, 1979 was a far different age to what we live in now and information like that was enough to scar an innocent teenager like myself for fucking life don’t cha know.

But I digress.

So, after having no success with Hampshire plod, Mike Floppycock’s alleged victim contacted John Lyon in 2011.

Unbelievably as it may seem, John Lyon who was the parliamentary commissioner for standards at the time informed her that he did not have a remit to examine Hancock’s behaviour.

Course he would do wouldn’t he, which in turn begs the question: Exactly what the fuck does the tax payer funded Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards do then if they don’t investigate complaints made against our tax payer salaried MP’s?

“They investigate MP’s suspected of financial irregularities Spiv”.

Fuck off Voice of Reason.

Cunts!

Never the less, not content to be fobbed off with old fanny, Mike Clapcock’s victim next approached the Liberal Democrat Party with her allegations… Unfortunately, once again, all to no avail.

Course, I can appreciate that by now some of you may be thinking that the woman’s claims simply had no credibility, hence no cunt was interested.

However, you would be very, very wrong as you will find out in due course.

Therefore, the fact that the Old Bill, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards & Old Mike Cripplecocks Political Party refused to take any fucking action, is a national fucking disgrace.

Moreover, Nick ‘the lot’ Clegg was already installed as the Leader of the Lib Dems at this stage yet claims to have known fuck all about the allegations until 2012 when he finally took action… Which was when Mike Microcock resigned the Whip.

However, for the Clot Clegg  not to to have been told about these serious allegations against one of his senior ministers when they were first made to the Lib Dem Party in 2011 is just total bollocks.

Which is why I wrote the following passage taken from my article, To Cut a Long Story Short, with my tongue poked firmly in my cheek:

And just because The Lib Dems were asked to investigate the woman’s claims in 2011, doesn’t mean that Clegg would have been informed… After all, to the Lib Dems, Clepto Clegg is just that fella who walks around the Houses of Parliament stealing things and as far as they are concerned, Vince ‘the lying cunt’ Cable is in charge.

In any event, the Lib Dems took no action on the grounds that the police inquiry and parliamentary authorities had found no case to answer… Well they wouldn’t would they.

So, its fair to say that Nepotist Nick probably took action as soon as he found out about Mike Floppycock’s inability to control his sexual urges… He’s probably a psychopath… And Quare to boot… I’m referring to Mick the Dick there of course, not Norman Nick… Who’s also a psychopath… Probably.

Now, below my contribution to this disgusting tale is The Guardian Newspapers, which comes in the form of an article that they published just two days before Christmas, which was in fact just prior to my phone call in which I was informed about Hancock’s unsavoury, and extremely sinister character.

The contents of The Guardians article deals with a report compiled by a QC named as being Nigel Pascoe.

The article in question states as fact that:

[A] previously unpublished independent report has found evidence that veteran Portsmouth MP Mike Hancock sexually assaulted and harassed a constituent and made “unwelcome sexual approaches”, the Guardian can reveal.

Nigel Pascoe QC, a leading barrister in sexual crime cases, interviewed Hancock’s accuser at length at the request of Portsmouth city council and concluded in August that there was evidence of sexual advances made by Hancock and that the MP was fully aware of his alleged victim’s mental health problems.

Pascoe also examined dozens of texts sent by Hancock to his accuser over a nine-month period from October 2009. Some messages said: “Please give me a chance you never know my princess xxx”, “… you are special and sexy to me xxx” and “just got here and in bed alone my love xxx”.

In the key passage in the 49-page report, Pascoe, a former president of the mental health review tribunals, said: “I consider that the prima facie evidence of his unwelcome sexual approaches remains unquestionably a very serious matter in the light of the position which he holds and his knowledge from the beginning of the vulnerability of [the alleged victim].”

The lawyer concludes: “No one in public life should allow themselves to act in such an irresponsible and damaging way.”

The report has remained hidden from public view until now, despite calls for the Liberal Democrat-controlled council to release it.

Hancock, elected as a Lib Dem, resigned the party’s parliamentary whip in the summer but remains a Lib Dem councillor in Portsmouth.

The report was sent to the alleged victim last week following a request under the Data Protection Act. Parts of the report have been redacted – particularly sections which appear to be about Hancock’s responses to the allegations.

The MP for Portsmouth South has been accused of making repeated physical sexual advances towards the woman – a young mother who had asked for help with noisy neighbours – despite being made aware that she suffered a mental health disorder and had been sexually abused as a child.

Pascoe wrote that she was a convincing and truthful witness, despite her health problems.

“Making full allowances for the disclosed mental history of [the alleged victim], I have no doubt that she has provided before me compelling prima facie evidence of serious and unwelcome sexual behaviour carried out towards her by Mr Hancock.

“I am of the clear view that her account is credible and merits both compassion and respect,” he wrote.

“I found [the alleged victim] to be a straightforward and vulnerable person, angry and hurt by what she said had happened to her… Indeed, at no point did I form the view that she lied to me,” he said.

Now, the person who rang me in regard to Hancock knows Nigel Pascoe very well and told me that Hancock categorically refused to have anything to do with the report when Pascoe was compiling it.

So it is interesting that the Guardian later states in the article:

Sources close to the council claimed Hancock declined to meet Pascoe. But Hancock told the Guardian Pascoe declined to meet him when he wished to explain that he wanted the case to be heard at the high court, not a council inquiry.

A spokesman for Hancock said Pascoe’s report was one-sided: “Mike Hancock asked to meet with the council’s independent investigator [Pascoe] to explain this and this was denied him.”

Unsurprisingly, that is careful wording on the MSM newspapers behalf, specifically designed to make the report appear biased.

You see, the Newspapers claim may well be true but any representations made by Hancock came about after the report was compiled – which as I say, I was reliably informed that the MP point blank refused to co-operate with, despite being invited to do so.

Furthermore, I am informed that Portsmouth Council were also very uncooperative – at least prior to the report being commissioned – and refused to condemn Hancock’s behaviour.

Tellingly, The Guardian states:

The report has remained hidden from public view until now, despite calls for the Liberal Democrat-controlled council to release it.

Well it would have done wouldn’t it, since the Liberal Democrat controlled Council wouldn’t want the reports extremely damaging findings against the Liberal Democrat Councillor, Mike Hancock made public would they.

Dog give me fucking strength.

Moreover, the newspaper also claims that:

Pascoe was instructed to prepare the report in May following representations that Hancock had broken the council’s code of conduct.

 After the report concluded in August, police re-examined the claims but dropped their inquiries in November, telling the alleged victim that they required more evidence.

The Police decision to again drop their inquiries for the 2nd time is what the  BBC report sourced earlier in this article relates to, but yet remains a disgusting decision given the contents of the report.

Hands up who doesn’t think that there is a fucking Whitewash taking place here?

That will just be Zing Zing a Zong, wotapackoflies and Doviel then… None of whose opinions count for fuck all.

Still, I have to say that I will be very surprised if Wobblycock’s victim is successful in the Civil Courts… I would imagine that Portsmouth City Council who are refusing to comment on the reports findings until after the case, are thinking the same.

Cunts!

In my opinion Karen Ingala Smith, Chief Executive of Nia, a charity which supports women who have experienced sexual violence, sums things up perfectly by stating:

The case is a prime example of how a woman’s claims against a powerful man can be overlooked.

The Liberal Democrat Party, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and the Lib Dem-led Portsmouth City Council have all chosen to ‘turn a blind-eye’ to the allegations against Mike Hancock.

He still holds a position of power that brings him into contact with members of the public. This should be unacceptable while there remains a case for him to answer

I will second that Karen.

Especially in view of Wibble Wobblecocks past indiscretions.

Course, it is also fair to say that Old Mickey Louse isn’t the only Lib Dem Councillor in trouble of late.

You see, fifty nine year old Derek Osbourne was up before the Beak in October of last year for his role in the distribution of child porn:

A former Liberal Democrat council leader has admitted making, possessing and distributing indecent images of children.

Derek Osbourne stepped down as leader of Kingston upon Thames, south west London, in June after 10 years in the job.

The Metropolitan Police said the 59-year-old was arrested on June 11 and analysis of his laptop uncovered images of children suffering ‘the most serious level of abuse’.

Osbourne pleaded guilty at Southwark Crown Court to seven counts of making indecent images of children, four counts of possession of indecent images of children and six counts of distributing indecent images of children. Source

Dirty vile cunts, the lot of them.

Moreover, it would appear that Mick the red is a communist which is okay I suppose if you buy into the principle but not the reality.

However, it does in fact have to be said that Hancock’s support for Russia and Eastern Block Countries is quite alarming and extreme to say the least.

The following is taken from Wikipedia:

Matyas Eorsi, a Hungarian member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, said of his colleague Hancock in August 2010: “He is the most pro-Russian MP from among all of the countries of western Europe. You just have to read his speeches. When it came to debates on Putin, freedom of the media or the war with Georgia, Michael always defended Russia. Among the Liberal bloc in Strasbourg we were all stunned by his position. According to him, Russia really is a fully-fledged democracy.”

Hancock has said that he will act to defend the government of Azerbaijan in the British Parliament. He says that he disapproves of criticism of President Ilham Aliyev‘s regime, and has stated that, in particular, he disapproves of the democratic opposition movement within Azerbaijan.

He was member of both the defence select committee from 1999 to 2011 and has been on the Speaker’s panel of chairmen since 1999. He is the vice-chairman of the all party groups onCroatia, and Russia.

He was previously chair of the Russia group, until being succeeded by Labour’s Chris Bryant, because he was felt to be too lenient towards Moscow: “We were concerned by Mike Hancock’s pro-Putin and pro-Medvedev position. That is why I stood against him and ousted him. His research assistant, who provided secretarial support to the group, was incensed and walked out.”

Hancock holds various positions on the Council of Europe, including a committee position on the Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee).

On 18 October 2011, amidst espionage allegations relating to his aide and mistress Katia Zatuliveter, Hancock resigned from his post on the defence select committee.

Kind of makes you wonder why the cunt didn’t fuck off to Russia doesn’t it. I mean, we all know how Communism came about and the part it plays in the Elites quest for world domination, least I hope we do, but regardless of that surely such a man is a threat to our National Security.

That would certainly appear to have been the case when he employed the Russian Katia Zatuliveter as one of his Aides.

Course, just like the rest of our Politicians whose lack of morality and hypocrisy goes beyond words, the slimeball couldn’t stop himself embarking on a 4 year love affair with the woman, despite him being married with two children.

Moreover, he embarked on the affair knowing full well that all the signs pointed to Zatuliveter being a Russian spy:

On 8 August 2010, one of Hancock’s parliamentary aides, Russian national Ekaterina “Katia” Zatuliveter and her friend were questioned at Gatwick Airport on returning from celebrating her 25th birthday in Croatia

Hancock had met Zatuliveter in Strasbourg where she worked for the Council of Europe

She started working as an aide to Hancock in 2008, after having been an intern at the House of Commons for a while and undergoing security vetting

Until Hancock was ousted as chairman of the All-Party Group on Russia in June 2010, Zatuliveter had been the group’s secretary, giving her direct access to all MPs with the greatest interest in Russia and legitimate reason to liaise with the Russian authorities; according to sources at Westminster, Zatuliveter had access to Hancock’s private emails, and virtually ran the UK-Russia group.

Reportedly, Zatuliveter had been identified by MI5 (UK Security Service) when surveillance linked her to another person with close links to the Russian embassy in London; the latter was suspected of working for the SVR, Russia’s foreign intelligence service.

On 4 December 2010, it was reported that Zatuliveter was facing deportation in Yarl’s Wood Immigration Removal Centre, after she was arrested by the Metropolitan Police Service on behalf of MI5 and the Border and Immigration Agency on 2 December 2010, on suspicion of espionage, the police action having been approved by Home Secretary Theresa May

The incident happened in the wake of the uncovering and expulsion of ten Russian sleeper agents in the US in June 2010, including a young woman who had British citizenshipAnna Chapman.

On 5 December 2010, Hancock confirmed the detention of Zatuliveter and advised the media that she was appealing deportation.In subsequent interviews on the same day, he called the espionage accusations “absolutely ludicrous” commenting further: “I have no reason to believe she did anything but act honourably during the time she was working for me. She is determined to fight her corner and she genuinely believes, and I back her 100%, that she has nothing to hide and has done nothing wrong. If she has, the (security) services are right. But they need to prove their point now. Source

Photo: Katia Zatuliveter

Okay, before I continue I should just point out a couple of things about the Russian Spy, Anna Chapman who was also mentioned in the above passage.

Chapman, described as being a femme fatale is the daughter of Vasily Kushchenko, a senior Russian diplomat in Zimbabwe and is believed to be a former KGB intelligence officer.

She was also married to Former Public Schoolboy Alex Chapman – now there’s a surprise – whom a former boyfriend of Anna’s claims that she only married to gain British citizenship:

Damning new evidence that an alleged Russian spy may have married a young Briton to obtain a British passport and ease entry to the West can now be revealed.

An email sent by 28-year-old ‘femme fatale’ Anna Chapman to a former boyfriend in Russia raises new questions over her four-year marriage to public schoolboy Alex Chapman.

In it she boasts: ‘We lived together for the first year, then after we got married, we moved to London. Source

Now, after Anna was arrested in New York, Alex engaged media publicist Max Clifford, and sold his story to The Daily Telegraph.. Same old same old crop up time and again in these sordid story’s… Have you noticed?

And, it has to be said that all this is starting to make the Profumo Affair seem rather tame – albeit quite to my disgust, sensitive information relating to the 1960’s scandal which involved the Cunt Camerons in-laws has just been locked away for another 50 years… I don’t suppose that info has anything to do with the part Phil the Duck played in the scandal has it?

Nah, couldn’t have.

Never the less, in 2012 it was reported that Chapman had almost caught a senior member of U.S. President Barry Obama’s cabinet in a honeytrap operation.

This was supposedly the primary motive behind the move to round up the ten-person spy ring in which she was a member.

The alleged  plan would have involved Chapman seducing her target before extracting information from him:

Sexpot spy Anna Chapman came close to snaring a member of President Obama’s inner circle in a honey trap, a top U.S. intelligence official has claimed.

In a documentary broadcast last night, FBI counter-intelligence chief Frank Figliuzzi claimed the glamorous Russian agent got close enough to ‘disturb’ U.S. spy catchers.  Source

And finally, to round things up on Anna, I should just mention that on the 3rd of July 2013 Chapman garnered media attention when, via Twitter, she asked Edward Snowden to marry her.

Whether her proposal was serious or not remains ambiguous. Source

 

Photo: Anna Chapman

Okay, lets get back to Hankypankycock and his bit on the side.

Now, as it happens, the charges levelled against Katia led to humiliation for MI5 after the so called ‘honey trap’ spy was allowed to stay in the country:

Not surprisingly, it is the Mike Hancock connection which has got the headlines in the deportation case of Katia Zatuliveter. However, yesterday’s decision by an immigration tribunal to let her stay in the country is a humiliation for MI5.

It had confidently asserted that she was a spy and should be deported. It is not only that the Immigration Appeals Tribunal rejected MI5′s claims, but one of its three members hearing the case was Stephen Lander, himself the former boss of MI5. He and his colleagues concluded that she was not employed by the Russian secret service and that all her behaviour was fully compatible with not being a spy. Source

This was despite Oleg Gordievsky, a high-flying Soviet agent who defected to the UK in 1985 claiming that Katia was the most successful Russian spy they had had in the last 30 years:

Ms Zatuliveter had used her four-year relationship with Liberal Democrat MP Mike Hancock to pass on British military secrets to the Kremlin.

Mr Gordievsky said the 26-year-old should be saluted as a “heroine” by Russia for her achievements as she had “disarmed” Britain and left no trail of her spying activities.

Asked by a Russian radio station about the damage she has caused, he claimed: “It is big. For four years she has been making the copies of military documents and bringing them to the embassy. Basically, she made Great Britain disarmed against Russia. It is a big crime, which is impossible to prove legally. I believe she will be sent out of Britain.”

Mr Gordievsky, 73, who defected to Britain in what was seen as one of MI6’s greatest coups, alleged Ms Zatuliveter had caused far more damage to the UK than femme fatale Anna Chapman managed against America.

If proven, his claims would seemingly contradict Mr Hancock’s insistence that, despite serving on the Defence Select Committee, he never let his lover and parliamentary aide see any classified or sensitive papers.

Mr Gordievsky claimed: “Katia Zatuliveter worked flat out, and was getting results. Imagine that for four years she has been gathering information and delivering it to the embassy. She is a heroine, unlike Chapman who is just some spoilt girl, of no interest at all. Zatuliveter is guilty, there is no doubt about that.”

Asked why Britain was not charging her with spying but merely seeking to deport her, Mr Gordivesky told Radio Svoboda she had left no trail. It’s very easy to answer – there is no proof. This is why they want to punish her in this way, and punish very softly.” Source

I gotta tell ya, the fact that we have cunts like Hancock in government beggars belief… It really does.

And, the fact that there are another 649 cunts like him blows my fucking mind.

Quite how the British population sunk so low as to allow these nonce ponce cunts such powerful lavish lifestyles without so much as a bleat, scares me to fucking death.

Course, Hang-cock is well know for his indiscretions. I mean, Fuck me! he was even described as being a “renowned womaniser” by the posh Times Newspaper.

However, whilst having affairs with other consenting adults isn’t illegal, it does show how shallow, dishonest, and untrustworthy Hang-cock is.

Moreover it also tells us that he has no sense of loyalty or strength of character, all of which an MP should have in abundance as far as I am concerned.

Now I have to say that disturbing as all the above is, it is the allegations of paedophilia that disturb me the most.

You see, at one time Hang-cock had been district officer for Mencap, and in 2010, opposition candidate Les Cummings had a batch of leaflets printed up for distribution alleging amongst other things that Hancock was a friend to known criminals and  that he had been seen in bed with children while on charity work in Romania with Mencap in the 1990s.

Now, it has to be said that whilst Hancock took out an injunction preventing Cummings distributing the leaflets, it was in fact his old friends the Hampshire Cuntstablary who took Cummings to court.

It should also be noted that as well as the injunction, Hancock published a document to be circulated refuting the allegations, yet he didn’t sue Cummings for deformation… Very strange.

Moreover, Cummings was similarly granted a counter injunction prohibiting Hancock from distributing his leaflets responding to the allegations… You couldn’t make this shit up.

Furthermore, the court proceedings relate to a criminal offence which isn’t so much to do with the contents of the leaflets, but more to do with the reason for the leaflets distribution:

Mr. Cummings is charged with a single offence contrary to s. 106(1) of the Representation of the People Act 1983, and which alleges that he on the 22nd April 2010 at Portsmouth in Hampshire, before an election and for the purpose of affecting the return of Mike Hancock, a candidate in the election, made and published a false statement in relation to Mike Hancock’s personal character which he knew or believed to be false.

The sub section reads as follows: –
‘A person who, or any director of any body or association corporate which –
(a) before or during an election.
(b) for the purpose of affecting the return of any candidate at the election,

makes or publishes any false statement of fact in relation to the candidate’s  personal character or conduct shall be guilty of an illegal practice, unless he can show that he had reasonable grounds for believing, and did believe, the statement to be true.

Never the less, Hancock was Predictably cleared of the allegations but during the course of the court case had been made to admit under cross-examination that  he had had ‘a few’ extra-marital affairs which he had told his wife about and that had been reported in the newspapers.

Which is presumably, the only reason that he told his wife.

Now, as I say, the scumbag was cleared of the paedophile allegations – sort of, albeit not conclusively – but taking into consideration what I have told you about the power Hancock wields, his apparent police protection and his association with Portsmouth Council – Then consider what we all know about our Nonce Ponce Sniffenpissins; and when adding them all together, I have to say that Les Cummings defence of the paedophile allegations levelled at Hancock certainly sound to me to have a certain credibility and more than a ring of truth about them.

See what you reckon:

Cummings told the court he had been abused as a child at a Portsmouth children’s home along with other family members and he had sought an apology from Portsmouth City Council, where Mr Hancock is also a councillor, but he had not received one.

He told the court from the witness box it was his ‘100 percent  belief’ that Mr Hancock is a paedophile.

He said the information about the allegations he printed in the leaflet came from several sources.

This included his electoral agent, Leo Ciccarone, who heard it from another man and a woman described in court as Maria Smythe who said she had overheard her mother talking about the Romanian allegations over family dinners.

‘Each piece of information led to another that led to another and that gave more credence to my beliefs,’ Cummings said.

He said he ‘was alarmed and astounded’ that the city he held responsible for exposing him to abuse had a representative ‘behaving in exactly the same way as the people who were abusing me all those years ago’.

He explained the leaflet had been written at night ‘when the ghosts from the past had come’ to him.

‘I was so disgusted by the situation. I wanted to shock people. On reflection I kind of wish I had not done that. I was acting like a victim at that time. I did not want anybody else to be exposed to what I believe was a sexual predator and paedophile.

Not convinced?

Okay, I should tell you that I purposely left out the most serious allegation of paedophilia levelled against the Monster.

You see, Les cummings also accused Psycho Mikeho of having sex with a 14 year old girl.

Course, allegations are easy to make, but when the accused admits under oath to kissing and cuddling with the girl, you cannot help but think – given the Sniffenpissins track record – that in all probability, a miscarriage of justice took place:

A leading Lib Dem MP who was accused by an election rival of ‘having sex with a 14-year-old girl’ yesterday admitted he ‘kissed and cuddled’ her.

Mike Hancock, 64, was branded ‘a paedophile’ in a leaflet by opposition candidate Les Cummings, 66, last year.

Cummings is on trial charged with making a false statement about the character of Mr Hancock with the purpose of affecting the return of the election.

But Hancock yesterday admitted that he had a ‘close and affectionate relationship’ with the girl in question. He also admitted to ‘a few’ extra marital affairs.

He said he first met the girl, who cannot be named for legal reasons, in her late teens in 1985 and the relationship gradually developed until she married in about 1993.

Mr Hancock said the girl was 17-years-old and not 14 as had been alleged in the leaflet. He said that the girl had driven to his office with her mother to enquire about work experience.

‘We were close and developed a personal friendship’, he told the court. ‘It was a very affectionate relationship – it was strong but not sexual.

‘There was physical contact between us – a kiss and a cuddle – but no more than that. Source

Convinced?

No?

Then I shall continue.

Now, Hancock the Toad can claim that the girl was 17 yrs old all he fucking likes, but what is missing from that Daily Chimpanzee report is that Cummings alleged that Mick the Dick was a governor at the girls school.

With that in mind, ask yourself how many girls were still at school aged 17 back in the 1980’s?

However, to be fair, that claim was later withdrawn by Cummings, although that fact could also allude to Hancocks guilt since that is the only allegation Cummings withdrew.

Moreover, there is another damming allegation about the girl left out of the Chimp article which is clearly stated in the official court documentation:

The evidence also developed this point to further assert that the same girl became pregnant by Mr. Hancock as a consequence of which the child underwent an abortion.

Other comments are made to the effect that Mr. Hancock had undertaken numerous trips to Romania, described as a ‘Child Sex Tourist’ destination and had been seen in bed with children in Romania.

Reference is additionally made in the following terms: ‘…Hancock is corrupt, a friend of known criminals, has had numerous extra-marital affairs

Neither does it end there.

You see, in summing up the Judge made mention of another story in regards to Hancocks paedophilia:

when told about this impending publication, Mr. Ciccarone was urging  caution and delay because a much better, amplified and apparently more salacious story could be obtained about Mr. Hancock concerning yet another girl, this time of  Chinese origin, who had apparently visited parliament and had been given a box of  chocolates and a cuddly toy.

Now, on reading this, I was immediately reminded of  a story I read about the fat cunt, nonce ponce Liberal Democrat MP Cyril Smith, who took one of his young conquests to dinner at the Houses of Parliament:

Now imagine your child being taken into care and raped by that fat cunt!

Similarly, the former child actor Ben Fellowes alleges that he too was taken to the Houses of Parliament by the predatory Paedophile Ian Greer, good friend and associate of the vile cunt Derek Laud… Who in turn was/is good friends with the Cunt Cameron… See, its like dot to fucking dot.

And whilst we are joining the dots, its worth mentioning that Cyril ‘fat nonce’ Smith received an MBE from Sweaty Betty as did Hancock receive a CBE… Just sayin’.

Also not mentioned in the MSM is that the prosecution did not base their case on all of the details listed on the leaflet.

Neither, was the court case specifically about proving the allegations to be false:

The prosecution base their case on a particular part of the leaflet, although admit the entirety of the document for the purpose of setting the averments in context.

The relevant part reads thus:

‘Les Cummings is naming Mike Hancock as a PAEDOPHILE!  He is a PAEDOPHILE who had an affair with a 14 year old schoolgirl, whilst
married to his wife Jacqui.

He was a Portsmouth Councillor and a Governor of this girl’s school.

We have a witness who saw Hancock in a Southsea casino and he was kissing her.

He has also made numerous trips to Romania and other ‘Child Sex Tourist’ destinations.

Witnesses tell of seeing Hancock in bed with children in Romania.

He has been exposed in newspapers over his numerous affairs and even took some of them on holiday. Which means, he
used YOUR MONEY to cheat on his wife and to take his mistresses on holiday.

If it’s not true, why won’t he sue?’

Certainly, at least as far as I’m concerned, Cummings appears to have come across as genuine when questioned by the plod.

However, the trial judge appears to imply that Cummings refusal to answer some of the Plod’s questions was tantamount to the allegations not being true:

Page 3 of 33:

Officer: ‘What was the purpose of sending these leaflets or posting them?’

Cummings: ‘I wanted the public to be aware that Mike Hancock had sexual relations with a 14 year old girl.’

Officer: ‘What do you know about that? What proof do you have?’

Cummings: ‘All I am going to say on that is, I do have statements and I believe it to be 100% true, otherwise I would never have done that. Other than that I am not going to comment further.

Page 4 of 33:

Officer: ‘Where did you gather those facts from?’

Cummings: ‘A variety of places.’

Officer: ‘For example?’

Cummings: ‘No comment’.

Officer: ‘Could you name the people that gave you this information.’

Cummings: ‘I am not prepared to do that.’

Officer: ‘What finally convinced you, that it was true?’

Cummings: ‘I am not going to make a comment.

It also has to be said that the alleged 14 year old girl, who later went on to marry “a much older man” was not called by the Crown to give evidence.

There is also the question of Eric Butlers evidence, which rings true with what I was told about Hancock.

Apparently, Butler went to see Hancock when his young Russian wife was having visa problems:

Mr. Butler also knew of Mike Hancock since about 1999. He married a girl by the name of Katerina, a Russian national who was 32 years his junior.

Nothing is ostensibly wrong with that but this young woman apparently had a visa problem and was in the UK upon a false basis.

Again Mike Hancock came to be consulted with a view to assisting this problem. During the surgery, what can only be described as
inappropriate conversation took place about Katerina and generally according to Mr. Butler.

It involved how attractive she was and how he, Mike Hancock, liked young women.

Mr. Butler then related how the conversation moved towards Mike Hancock informing his constituent that the age of consent in Russia was apparently 14 years.

Close: Mr Hancock advised Ekaterina Paderina, then 25, that she had every right to remain in Britain after she fell out with her middle-aged husband

Photo: katerina Paderina

Neither can the evidence of a former Councillor by the name of Baker be just written off.

Mind you, it has to be said that Baker was convicted of corruption, which although making him a poor calibre of witness, never the less once again highlights the dishonesty and lack of integrity prevalent in those employed in both local and national government:

 Mr. Baker was another witness and who was an ex-councillor in the Conservative cause.

Mr. Hancock however, was a witness at Mr. Baker’s trial for corruption. Mr. Baker was also a bank clerk working for Nat West. Since he was 21 (in 1982) he had visited casinos and in particular “Soames”, Osbourne Road, Southsea.

At the casino he apparently met Mike Hancock With whom he was later to share a political interest in the council although for different parties.

Mr. Baker relates that he saw a girl he believed to be 14 at the time, the Miss A referred to in the evidence.

He knew her to be a member of the Jewish community and she was with Mike Hancock in 1983 in the casino. He remembers this well because Mr. Baker also explained that he was pushed out of the way in a high handed fashion at the cash desk by Mr. Hancock.

Miss A was “made up” and Mr. Hancock appeared to have his arms placed around her. Source

So there you have it… Almost anyway.

There are a couple of other small points that add to the credibility of Lee Cummings allegations.

The first is that Hang-cock worked as a Director of the Daytime Club at the BBC. Course, that fact proves fuck all, but knowing what we do about the BBC, it certainly warrants a mention.

Likewise, his Russian bird also worked there:

The blonde Russian accused of being a spy also worked for the BBC, it was revealed last night.

Katia Zatuliveter was employed as a researcher on a major documentary in Moscow just four months before she was arrested on suspicion of espionage.

It is understood she arranged interviews with people in Vladimir Putin’s government for the documentary which focussed on Russia’s relationship with the West.

She worked on the project with Angus Roxburgh, a former BBC foreign correspondent, during parliamentary recess. 

Zatuliveter, known to wear short skirts around Westminster, is accused of obtaining confidential information by working as an aide to Liberal Democrat MP Mike Hancock. 

BBC colleagues later said the 25-year-old, who was employed by production company Brook Lapping, seemed oddly distracted at work. 

‘She failed to make much of an impression,’ said Mark Franchetti, Moscow correspondent of the Sunday Times.

Source

Hmmm. I think that its high time that the Zionist run TV station was also dismantled.

I seriously doubt that the paedophiles paradise would be missed… Except by paedophiles of course.

And this brings me to my ulterior motive for writing this lengthy article.

You see, the Vile, Sniffenpissin Monster Smallcock has been the chairman of the southern region of the NSPCC since 1989.

You do know the about the NSPCC don’t you?

The Children’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, that has been involved in investigating child abuse claims in regard to nearly every high profile child murder that has taken place in Britain over the past 40 years before the deed was done.

Yet In each case they failed to prevent the murder happening…  Included amongst those high profile cases are that of Fred & Rose West and Victoria  Climbe.

Tellingly, the NSPCC were accused of being at fault in all of them.

But that is just the start of my gripes with the ‘charity.

You see, the NSPCC is:

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, whose Social Workers were taking part in Satanic Child Abuse.

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, whose Social workers whilst in their employ were taking part in child sex abuse along with the notorious care home boss Frank Beck.

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, whose employee was exposed after giving the Paedophile Stuart Hall a character reference for his recent trial for child rape.

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, whose organisation is nothing more than a cash cow for perverted rich cunts who also take their pick of the children for their sick and twisted pleasure.

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, That receives huge government funding to investigate cases of child sex abuse, yet merely passes on any information they receive to the Social Services.

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, who spend the donations that you so generously give over on huge wages for greedy nonce fat cats, expensive company cars and air flights to conferences and such like. In fact, a quarter of all donations that the NSPCC receive is officially syphoned off to keep these perverts in luxury – although the real amount is probably far more:

In the last financial year 75.3% of our expenditure was spent on activities to end cruelty to children. You can find more detail of this in our financial report (page 5).  Duty Enquiries Officer NSPCC Safeguarding Information & Library Service Source

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, that employs perverted paedophile cunts such as Princess Andrew, Peter Mandelson, Jimmy Savile and Slaggy Maggie Thatcher.

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, who employed, and promoted to senior management, South Africa’s former most wanted MK Terrorist suspected of being involved in at least 3 carbomb attacks which left at least 7 dead, and hundreds more severely wounded.

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, whose Senior Management and former Chairman, threatened, bullied and intimidated at least 4 professional staff members out of their jobs for the crime of trying to make public the corruption that runs prevalent throughout the organisation.

And,

The Chidren’s Charity, and I use the term very loosely, that employs low life scum with questionable sexual preferences such as Mike Hancock… Just sayin’.


 

 

 

MP Mike Hancock ‘made unwelcome sexual approaches’, lawyer concludes

Nigel Pascoe QC’s report into allegations against Portsmouth South MP was hidden from public view until now.
MIke Hancock

Portsmouth South MP MIke Hancock resigned the Lib Dem parliamentary whip earlier this year. Photograph: Chris Ison/PA

A previously unpublished independent report has found evidence that veteran Portsmouth MP Mike Hancock sexually assaulted and harassed a constituent and made “unwelcome sexual approaches”, the Guardian can reveal.

Nigel Pascoe QC, a leading barrister in sexual crime cases, interviewed Hancock’s accuser at length at the request of Portsmouth city council and concluded in August that there was evidence of sexual advances made by Hancock and that the MP was fully aware of his alleged victim’s mental health problems.

Pascoe also examined dozens of texts sent by Hancock to his accuser over a nine-month period from October 2009. Some messages said: “Please give me a chance you never know my princess xxx”, “… you are special and sexy to me xxx” and “just got here and in bed alone my love xxx”.

In the key passage in the 49-page report, Pascoe, a former president of the mental health review tribunals, said: “I consider that the prima facie evidence of his unwelcome sexual approaches remains unquestionably a very serious matter in the light of the position which he holds and his knowledge from the beginning of the vulnerability of [the alleged victim].”

The lawyer concludes: “No one in public life should allow themselves to act in such an irresponsible and damaging way.”

The report has remained hidden from public view until now, despite calls for the Liberal Democrat-controlled council to release it.

Hancock, elected as a Lib Dem, resigned the party’s parliamentary whip in the summer but remains a Lib Dem councillor in Portsmouth.

The report was sent to the alleged victim last week following a request under the Data Protection Act. Parts of the report have been redacted – particularly sections which appear to be about Hancock’s responses to the allegations.

The MP for Portsmouth South has been accused of making repeated physical sexual advances towards the woman – a young mother who had asked for help with noisy neighbours – despite being made aware that she suffered a mental health disorder and had been sexually abused as a child.

Hancock, 67, resigned the parliamentary whip earlier this year over the claims and is being sued by his alleged victim. He has denied the allegations and insists he will vigorously defend himself in court.The disclosure increases pressure on Nick Clegg, whose party has been mired in recent claims that it has failed to examine sexual harassment claims seriously and Portsmouth city council which has refused to take disciplinary action against Hancock.

It also brings into focus the restricted remit of the parliamentary commissioner for standards office which has the means to examine allegations of financial wrongdoing, but cannot investigate claims that an MP has abused their position in other ways.

Pascoe was instructed in May following representations that Hancock had broken the council’s code of conduct.

Hampshire police had previously been asked to investigate the alleged sexual abuse but found no case to answer.

Pascoe’s investigation concerned a seven-month period from November 2009 after the alleged victim approached Hancock for help. The woman, who was then 35 and had a 12-year-old son, claimed the MP placed his hand on her breast, exposed himself and kissed her on many occasions without consent.

Hancock also took her and her son to parliament for dinner, she said, bought her a teddy bear that he named Mike and sent her dozens of texts.

Pascoe interviewed the alleged victim twice and examined her mental health history at length, according to the report.

He concluded she was “convincing and truthful” and “angry and hurt” by what she said had happened to her.

He also approached Hancock. Sources close to the council claimed Hancock declined to meet Pascoe. But Hancock told the Guardian Pascoe declined to meet him when he wished to explain that he wanted the case to be heard at the high court, not a council inquiry.

A spokesman for Hancock said Pascoe’s report was one-sided: “Mike Hancock asked to meet with the council’s independent investigator [Pascoe] to explain this and this was denied him.”

After the report concluded in August, police re-examined the claims but dropped their inquiries in November, telling the alleged victim that they required more evidence.

Pascoe, however, says in his report it is normal for a sex charge to progress and secure convictions without corroboration.

A spokesman for Portsmouth council said its inquiry into the sexual allegations against Hancock had been suspended until after the civil action is over.

The 49 page report said that Hancock was fully aware of the mental health background of the alleged victim. “His knowledge cannot be in dispute in the light of the letters written by him on behalf of [the alleged victim] and the letters received by him about her,” Pascoe wrote.

Pascoe wrote that she was a convincing and truthful witness, despite her health problems.

“Making full allowances for the disclosed mental history of [the alleged victim], I have no doubt that she has provided before me compelling prima facie evidence of serious and unwelcome sexual behaviour carried out towards her by Mr Hancock.

“I am of the clear view that her account is credible and merits both compassion and respect,” he wrote.

“I found [the alleged victim] to be a straightforward and vulnerable person, angry and hurt by what she said had happened to her… Indeed, at no point did I form the view that she lied to me,” he said.

Pascoe added that the actions of Hancock were not motivated “solely by sexual desire” and that the MP had shown some kindness towards her which has not been reflected in press reports. “There is clear evidence that he sought to help her wholly properly as her local councillor in a detailed way which was commendable,” he added.

Although it is not within Pascoe’s remit to say whether criminal charges should be brought against the MP, he says that “the time for equivocation has ended. These matters should have been addressed definitively a long time ago.”

Pascoe ended the report by saying that he consented to the full report being published.

Hancock, who is married, has a history of involving himself with other women.

He has been accused of affairs with Liberal Democrat colleagues and had an affair with his former parliamentary assistant, Ekaterina Zatuliveter, who was cleared of spying charges.

Clegg has been criticised for failing to ensure that his party takes previous sexual harassment seriously. Lord Rennard, the party’s former campaign chief, was the subject of a now dropped police investigation into harassment.

Karen Ingala Smith, Chief Executive of Nia, a charity which supports women who have experienced sexual violence, said that the case is a prime example of how a woman’s claims against a powerful man can be overlooked.

“The Liberal Democrat Party, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and the Lib Dem-led Portsmouth City Council have all chosen to ‘turn a blind-eye’ to the allegations against Mike Hancock.

“He still holds a position of power that brings him into contact with members of the public. This should be unacceptable while there remains a case for him to answer,’ she said.

A spokesman for the Lib Dems said the party takes the allegations against Hancock seriously.