Jun 29 2012
It has been revealed by the prince’s annual account that Charles received almost 2.2 million pounds ($3.4million) from grants and government departments in the year to March 31, which is a rise of 11 percent comparing to the year before.
While the cost of his son, William’s royal wedding remains confidential, figures show that Charles, the heir to the throne’s income and expenditures both rose at the cost of the taxpayers in the UK.
The British Prince receives a large income from properties and investments of the Duchy of Cornwall. A land the size of 136,000 acres was established in the 14th century to provide income for the heir to the throne.
Due to the British Prince frequently using air travel, was a result in carbon costs being relatively high, with a 38 percent rise in carbon dioxide emissions brought about by overseas travel.
The accounts relate to 11 months after Prince William’s wedding with Kate Middleton, currently known as the Duchess of Cambridge, a new member of the British royal family.
Moreover, the cost of the Westminster Abbey wedding that took place on 29 April 2011 remains discreet. This could be due to extremely high figures feared to trigger anger and frustration to many Britons who disapprove of the royal family’s presence.
In a move sure to infuriate people of common sense, the Prince of Wales has just sold humanity (and the earth) down the river with his recent remarks about Islam leading the way in the Green Movement, as reported in the Daily Mail UK:
Prince Charles yesterday urged the world to follow Islamic ‘spiritual principles’ in order to protect the environment.
In an hour-long speech, the heir to the throne argued that man’s destruction of the world was contrary to the scriptures of all religions – but particularly those of Islam.
He said the current ‘division’ between man and nature had been caused not just by industrialisation, but also by our attitude to the environment – which goes against the grain of ‘sacred traditions’….
He added: ‘The inconvenient truth is that we share this planet with the rest of creation for a very good reason – and that is, we cannot exist on our own without the intricately balanced web of life around us.
‘Islam has always taught this and to ignore that lesson is to default on our contract with creation.’
The bonehead Prince Charlie made his pro-Islam comments during a speech at Oxford’s Centre for Islamic Studies, in which he so blatantly sucked up to his hosts/sponsors that the audience appeared to be completely disgruntled to the point of revulsion.
What Islamic “spiritual principles,” Charles? The ones embodied in the Koran and other Islamic texts that say Jews are “apes and pigs” who should be hunted down and slaughtered? Or the Koranic verses that dictate all non-Muslims must be murdered or that otherwise incite Muslim followers to violence? Or how about the Koranic scriptures and commentaries that say women are worth one-half or less then men, that men are their superiors and essentially own them as property?
How does any of this hateful rubbish constitute Islamic respect for the “intricately balanced web of life around us?” Have you ever seen the practices of Islamic animal slaughter or read the derogatory Islamist remarks about dogs and other animals? While the West can barely get a handle on animal abuse, at least it tries, but you can bet animal abuse is far more rampant in many if not most Muslim countries.
And associating environmentalism with Islam is another disgrace that will completely turn off millions of people from joining the Green Movement. From the looks of things – such as the proposed London mega-mosque, which was planned to have sand all around it – if Muslim fanatics were left to their own, they would turn the entire planet into one big desert. Yep, that’s a fine environmental principle.
Where is the great environmental record of rabid Islamists, Charles, who are busy blowing things up, cranking polluting oil out of the ground and reproducing at world-destroying rates? (Yes, yes, there is room for vast improvement in all these areas in the non-Muslim world as well, but at least we are not making any absurd pretenses here about great “spiritual values” where there are none – and at least we acknowledge the problem and try to work on it, rather than lying about the situation, as Charles is doing here.)
Thanks, Charles, for selling one-half of humanity down the road to slavery. (And the other half as well, as you men will all need to get down on your knees and stick your arses in the air five times a day in a nonsensical and time-consuming ritual that will surely spell the end to productivity in the civilized world.)
Charles, if free women (and men) become enslaved under Islamic domination, you and your other politico-buddy sellouts anddhimwits will be largely to blame. Shame on you for now and forever!